1/2 "QAwerk team has been of enormous help in improving the quality of our releases at Kazidomi. They are communicative and highly professional, with a proactive attitude.

1/9 Every few months a new article drops declaring AI has finally "solved" software testing. 2024, 2025, now 2026. At QAwerk, we've spent the last year actually running these tools on real client projects. Not benchmarks. Real codebases, real deadlines, real bugs.

1/9 Every few months, a new wave of "how to become a QA automation tester" guides floods the internet. Coursera, Udemy, YouTube. take your pick. The roadmaps are always the same: learn Python, learn Selenium, learn some CI/CD basics, profit.

"I feel like our QA was so bad, but we definitely improved it with QAwerk, and looking forward to some new improvement with you." -- Sinéad Ryan,, Head of Global Services at Evolv Technologies More client stories: qawerk.com/testimonials/

1/2 "The QA team has been a great help for the release of our new offering, Unfold for Brands. The team has really put themselves in the place of the user to find any bugs or user experience issues, mitigating any potential issues at launch."

1/3 "QAwerk is proactive and helpful. QAwerk has conducted comprehensive manual and automated testing, including functional, regression, and usability testing, alongside automated tests covering a wide range of scenarios.

"AI-powered security" is often just a better-labeled false alarm. known patterns caught. new attacks: ignored. auto-remediation: can cascade failures. predictions: blind to novel AI attacks. your leadership thinks u're covered. u're not.

"AI will replace QA engineers" nope AI writes 200 test cases in 2 minutes finds patterns in bug history automates regression but it tests what you ask it to test a good QA engineer tests what nobody thought of that gap is still very human.

test automation fails not because of tools because of expectations ppl think: write once, run forever reality: maintain forever or watch it rot unstable env, no ownership, devs shipping without telling QA then everyone blames selenium wrong patient.

everyone's "scaling automated testing" now but most ship flaky tests, not fast releases automation ≠ speed automation = stability first, speed second wrong foundation, wrong results.