Random post about entertainment and politics 🇵🇭
Republic of the Philippines
Joined July 2025
- Tweets18.1K
- Following610
- Followers267
- Likes77K
Pinned Tweet
I'm disappointed with the Senate. Gunshots, power plays, and a senator hiding inside the building—this isn’t how institutions should work. While the country faces real problems, our lawmakers are busy with political drama to protect the criminal instead of serving the public.
Atom 💙❤️ retweeted
david sabatini is one of the brightest scientists in america. years after a fake rape accusation shattered his life and career, he sued his accuser and won. he discussed the details of this shocking story with @neerajadeshp for pirate wires:
Former MIT scientist David Sabatini just won $6 million in a landmark case against false allegations of r*pe and sexual assault, which destroyed his career.
Once on track to win the Nobel Prize, Sabatini’s ex-girlfriend accused him of r*pe in 2020 and began calling him the ‘Weinstein of science.’ He was later accused of perpetuating a “bro culture” in his lab. As a result, he was stripped of all his funding, lost his job, and went bankrupt.
We interviewed Sabatini (@DMSabatini) about the verdict, which he says made him “proud to be an American.”
@neerajadeshp reports 👇
Atom 💙❤️ retweeted
Former MIT professor David Sabatini won a $6 million jury verdict in a defamation and tortious interference case against a fellow MIT scientist who accused him of sexual coercion.
Sabatini’s lawsuit alleged Dr. Kristin Knouse orchestrated a deliberate campaign to have him removed from MIT and derail his career opportunities.
Knouse denied the allegations and countersued, but the jury rejected her claims.
In our interview, Sabatini said:
“…we have literally the messages where she is talking to people being interviewed and what you're going to say, then coordinating with her students, drafting emails to send to the Whitehead saying that no woman should be safe in the building with me…”
Here’s a clip from out reporting:
Atom 💙❤️ retweeted
Australia's public servants are increasingly enjoying better pay, more generous benefits and greater job flexibility than the private sector workers and small businesses that fund them.
Former Prime Minister John Howard has warned that Australia's expanding public sector, excessive government spending and lack of economic reform are undermining productivity and economic growth:
dailytelegraph.com.au/news/n…
The figures are revealing:
- Public sector employees earn 11% more than private sector workers on average: $2,263 versus $2,034 per week.
- Public sector wage growth has exceeded private sector growth for six consecutive quarters.
- Australian Public Service (APS) employees receive 15.4% superannuation, compared with the private sector statutory minimum of 12%.
- Public servants receive more generous personal and carers leave entitlements.
- Public servants generally enjoy significantly greater opportunities for working from home, flexible hours and other flexible working arrangements.
- Australia's public sector in total employs approximately 2.6 million people (state and federal), growing another 3.3% in 2025.
Small businesses, meanwhile, face rising costs, shrinking margins, regulatory burdens and difficulty competing for staff. One in three small businesses has reportedly considered closing.
Warren's excellent cartoon captures this growing divide, but it contained one very important mistake...
The modern federal public service is overwhelmingly female. There are approximately 55% more women than men in the APS, with women constituting the majority at every classification level.
The modern bureaucrat pictured on the right should therefore be a woman in her late-30s to mid-40s. So I've fixed it, to accurately capture the current circumstances...
Importantly, the federal APS is predominantly concerned with administration, policy and regulation, rather than frontline health and education services, which are largely delivered by state and territory governments.
Public servants perform important functions, and competitive remuneration is necessary. However, when government employment consistently offers better pay, benefits, security and flexibility than the businesses generating Australia's prosperity, the balance has clearly shifted too far and we're heading in the wrong direction...
A thriving Australia needs a productive private sector, not an ever-expanding bureaucracy.
Atom 💙❤️ retweeted
Dave Foley was ordered to pay his ex-wife $17,700 a month in child support. That was five times what he actually earned.
If he set foot in Canada, he would be arrested at the border.
When he asked the judge how he’d feed his daughter from his second marriage, he says the court’s answer was simple: “They can rot in hell.”
In 1997, Foley was starring on NBC’s NewsRadio and making about $1 million a year. That year, he separated from his first wife, Tabatha Southey.
An Ontario judge set his payments at $17,700 a month, or $212,400 a year after taxes, based on his sitcom salary.
Two years later, NBC canceled the show. His income dropped by nearly 80%.
He went back to court to lower the payments. The judge said no. The court ruled he had made $1 million once, so he should keep paying like he still did.
His ex-wife lived in a $2.5 million house on a park in Toronto. Foley rented a small loft in downtown LA.
By 2011, he owed more than $500,000 in back payments. Ontario threatened to pull his passport and issued a warrant for his arrest if he came home.
In the video below, Foley explains the math: “I’m paying about five times my income every month in child support, based on a show that hasn’t been on for 12 years.”
He couldn’t work in Canada again until he landed a new sitcom in 2014 and had his paychecks garnished at the source.
The case for the court: a parent shouldn’t get to slash support just because their career slows down.
The case for Dave: locking a canceled actor into 1990s sitcom money under threat of prison is extortion.
Should child support be tied to what you earn today, or the best year you ever had?
Atom 💙❤️ retweeted
🚨 BOMBSHELL COURT EVIDENCE EXPOSES EXPLOSIVE PRIVATE MESSAGES REVEALING COORDINATION BETWEEN KRISTIN KNOUSE AND MIT PROFESSOR SANGEETA BHATIA IN THE DAVID M. SABATINI ORDEAL.
🔱 NEW REVELATION — Court evidence exposes how Knouse and Bhatia privately celebrated Sabatini’s removal, discussed the potential destruction of his professional career, and anticipated the revocation of his @MIT tenure.
An 80-message exchange between Kristin Knouse and MIT Professor Sangeeta Bhatia, dated August 20–21, 2021, reveals their private reactions immediately following Whitehead Institute and HHMI's severance of ties with Professor @DMSabatini.
The communications contain statements that deserve serious public examination.
🔴 1. “YOU DID IT” — “AND HE’S OUT.”
On August 20, 2021, Bhatia congratulated Knouse:
🔴 “YOU DID IT. You crossed the finish line. It's out in the open. And you're not out in the open. And you're on the faculty. And he's out.”
Knouse responded:
🔴 “You connecting me to Nancy [Hopkins]was the turning point. I will never forget that walk in Lexington.”
🔴 2. “THIS WAS THE OUTCOME I DREAMED OF.”
The following morning, as news coverage spread, Knouse discussed the possibility of Sabatini losing his MIT tenure:
🔴 “Hard to imagine MIT will be left with any choice other than to revoke tenure.”
Bhatia responded:
🔴 “You're right about tenure”
She subsequently wrote:
🔴 “This was the outcome I dreamed of but NEVER certain I would get it.”
Knouse also described her assessment of Whitehead's handling of the matter:
🔴 “And as skeptical as I was of Whitehead's end game, in the end I think the overall process was perfectly executed.”
Bhatia expressed her approval of Whitehead Institute Director Ruth Lehmann:
🔴 “I'm proud of Ruth [Lehmann]”
These exchanges occurred months before MIT's April 2022 tenure-revocation recommendation.
🔴 3. THE PROFESSIONAL CONSEQUENCES — BEYOND WHITEHEAD.
The participants also discussed Sabatini's corporate affiliations and prospects for future employment.
Knouse wrote:
🔴 “I know of one company already speaking with lawyers to remove him on grounds of morality clause.”
She subsequently stated:
🔴 “Hard to imagine how he can be gainfully employed anywhere after the past 24 hours ...”
These were not merely discussions about an institutional investigation. They extended to the potential consequences for Sabatini's career, tenure, corporate affiliations, and future livelihood.
🔴 4. THE DIVERSITY SURVEY AND PROTECTION FROM PUBLIC IDENTIFICATION.
In another particularly consequential exchange, Bhatia wrote:
🔴 “Also the dei survey and subsequent investigation really protects you, which I love. There is not even a scent of whistleblower in all the press.”
This statement takes on particular significance alongside the previously disclosed communications in which Knouse and Nora Kory discussed using Whitehead's diversity survey to conceal an investigation already under consideration (📑 see the original court evidence in the first comment below).
🔴 5. “WE DRANK CHAMPAGNE” — CELEBRATING AS THE NEWS SPREAD.
Perhaps the most striking exchange appears on KK011419.
On August 21, 2021, Knouse declared:
🔴 “I KNOW! Young people took down a relatively young king. Progress, progress, progress.”
Knouse also wrote:
🔴 “Two other women who came forward and I drank champagne while watching the Tweets and articles roll in last night. It felt like campaign headquarters after an election victory. Really special.”
Bhatia responded:
🔴 “That's awesome.”
These exchanges reinforce the serious concerns about coordination and conflicts of interest raised by our previous disclosures. Their significance must be assessed alongside the full documentary record and the subsequent jury verdict.
The scientific community deserves full accountability for any misconduct established by the evidence, including the roles of individuals who participated in or improperly influenced the institutional processes that subjected Professor Sabatini to a devastating ordeal and profoundly damaged his career.
📑 REVIEW THE ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE BELOW.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
MORE COURT EVIDENCE. MORE REVELATIONS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
🔱 Part 5 — Joint Appendix JA004741: Court evidence reveals reported support and pressure involving senior MIT faculty
🚨 Court documents reveal that Kristin Knouse described support from influential MIT faculty members during the proceedings concerning Professor David M. Sabatini.
⚠️ In messages dated 13 October 2021, Knouse identified support attributed to senior MIT figures and described their willingness to approach MIT President Rafael Reif to influence the institutional outcome.
These communications document efforts to mobilize influential individuals within MIT during Sabatini's tenure-review proceedings.
📑 THE ORIGINAL COURT EVIDENCE IS PRESENTED BELOW.
Atom 💙❤️ retweeted
We have eight federal offices of health for women. Zero for men. How is this fair? There’s so much pushback to creating an office for men, which doesn’t make any sense to me. Don’t we want our partners, our sons, our fathers, brothers, our friends and colleagues to be healthy?
In America, men have worse health outcomes across every ethnic, racial and socioeconomic group; they are more likely to die at every age; and they lead in 13 of the top 15 causes of death.
Meanwhile, the National Institutes of Health spends about 2.5 times more on women’s health research than it does on men’s, and this has been true for nearly forty years.
Yet, despite this… there are now eight federal, tax-funded Offices of Women’s Health, and zero for men.
And so, statistically speaking, the formation of the first Office of Men’s Health seems like a no-brainer, and an urgently needed step to help stem the deluge of early male deaths.
But sadly, many still find it a controversial ask, and remain dedicated to undermining any political move to open such an office.
Instead, such people insist the opposite is true: that women’s health is where attention, and all the funding, should go.
So let’s look at the stats and ask what is so unpopular about men living long, healthy, happy lives…
What do you think?
~
My new Ask Me (Us) Anything with @LisaBritton is out now! youtube.com/watch?v=bAYEaT8W…
Men lead in 13 of the top 15 causes of death sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
NIH Gendered Funding jameslnuzzo.substack.com/p/n…
Men and boys have higher mortality at every age washingtonpost.com/wellness/…
Men have worse health in every group
congress.gov/bill/119th-cong…
Atom 💙❤️ retweeted
Women can sue their statutory rape victims for child support:
That law was created by a female rapist herself
In Zimbabwe, gangrapes by women against men rising
Acid attacks by women against men exist
Unidirectional IPV by women is more common than unidirectional IPV by men
So basically men just consistently hating women and they hate that we are acknowledging that after centuries of abuse. instagram.com/reel/DefaK-ikt…
Atom 💙❤️ retweeted
The UK gov is putting £15m into an anti-misogyny fund.
Its Men's Health Strategy gives £3.6m over three years to suicide prevention for men, about £1.2m a year.
4,599 men died by suicide in England & Wales in 2024, three-quarters of all suicides.
Priorities?
Atom 💙❤️ retweeted
It is essential to share the whole truth and context of what was truly said and meant. As a community, we must always rally to uphold the same respect and dignity that Donny embodies. After all, we stand not only with him but also for what is right and just.
#DonnyPangilinan
Atom 💙❤️ retweeted
Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh
Meet Priya Sharma
- She got married for the first time in Delhi in 2018.
- She divorced her husband because he lost his job and became unemployed.
- She then married Shashank Kantharia, a Central Government employee.
- They had a 3 year old daughter.
- She started going to Fitness Headquarter gym around 7–8 months ago.
- She started an affair with her gym trainer, Pratap Singh.
- She and Pratap planned to delete Shashank so they could get married.
- On October 26, 2026, Priya left the doors of the house open and went to the gym.
- After a few minutes, Pratap entered their home and stabbed Shashank 12 times.
- Shashank survived the attack and was hospitalised.
- Police have arrested Priya and Pratap and are investigating the matter.
She left her first husband because he was unemployed.
Her second husband had a government job and was nice.
They even had a 3-year-old daughter.
Why not simply leave him? Why plan to delete him?
Atom 💙❤️ retweeted
[261028] @NAMOOACTORS2004
: Did you forget? I mean the PLAY, SONG KANG behind-the-scenes~
#SongKang #송강
Atom 💙❤️ retweeted
Here's the clip from full interview ni Donny from TV Patrol.
Totoo talaga na you can tell who has emotional intelligence and a healthy mindset by the way they handle situations like this. He can be humble enough to admit na magiging awkward for them, especially since they're under the same network and there's a possibility na magkikita pa rin sila, without being disrespectful with his words. That's what being a gentleman looks like.
I just hope the management of Baby Dolls and GGV takes accountability for this. Yes, it was an unfiltered interview, but that doesn't give anyone the free pass to sexualize someone and share too much personal information, especially when it makes people uncomfortable.
And saying na w3t dreams are something you can't control misses the point. The issue isn't the dream itself, but the decision to openly share something sexual about another person, knowing that it could reach a wider audience. Is that really something you're proud to tell the public?
Being unfiltered doesn't mean you get to disregard someone's dignity and boundaries. There's a difference between being open and being inappropriate, and just because something can be said doesn't mean it should be said. Accountability matters, and being in the entertainment industry doesn't exempt anyone from that.
PERIODT!
Atom 💙❤️ retweeted
[FULL] Donny on GGV inappropriate incident involving Babydolls Juby’s sexual dream story on him and on people reacting and defending him:
“I honestly understand where people are coming from. It’s NICE THAT THEY’RE ABLE TO SPARK THESE TYPES OF CONVERSATIONS. These are very healthy conversations to have. It’s A QUESTION OF WHETHER CERTAIN THINGS SHOULD BE SHARED IN DIFFERENT PLATFORMS. I don’t think she meant to hurt someone baka masyadong naging kumportable siya. This is one of their first interviews and it’s a LEARNING EXPERIENCE FOR EVERYONE. Mas AWKWARD KASI ALAM KONG MAKIKITA KO SILA. We’re in the same network.”
Donny was gracious and proper enough to not escalate the situation publicly. His statement was clear, the conversations against sexualization are correct and welcomed, what happened was wrong and people should learn from that and the whole thing made him uncomfortable and will continue to because he knows he will see them too.
DO NOT TWIST Donny’s words and DO NOT make him the villain. He shouldn’t even be asked this during his business grand launch and he is not the one whom the media should be asking a statement from. Ask the REAL people involved! Where is the accountability? Spare Donny from any more of this! He does not deserve to be dragged on things he never created.
RESPECT DONNY PANGILINAN
#DonnyPangilinan
Atom 💙❤️ retweeted
At dahil iba ang nahighlight sa interview, let’s post this too. What’s next for Donny?
It’s nice to hear that there are a couple of things in the works for him. Tamang updates lang to keep us informed of what’s happening. #DonnyPangilinan
Atom 💙❤️ retweeted
Posting this in full since hindi lahat ‘to pinalabas sa TVPatrol. He clearly explained how he sees it. The fact that he understood where people were coming from and considered it a healthy thing to discuss does not invalidate people’s reactions. He did not tolerate what happened.
Being the proper guy that he always is, he was very careful with his words when he answered the question of whether he was offended. Ang ayos at ang ganda ng paliwanag nya tapos sya pa ang masasabihan ng hindi maganda. Ayusin nyo!
RESPECT DONNY PANGILINAN