An inequitable geographic distribution of students who are even trying to get into specialized high schools. Awareness of, and desire to attend these science and math-focused schools must be brought to the Bronx and central-eastern Brooklyn. @BPEricAdams @rubendiazjr
Tom Allon, many people are proud to see excellence-achieving Americans, but what do YOU see in these 4 photos? This is a kind of Rorschach test.
Why don't you "decry these shameful statistics and offer solutions"? Isn't it true that "something needs to be done" to "shake things up" and "improve this festering state of affairs" and "right this wrong"?
Where are your "proposals that can help reform this broken system" and "ensure greater equity" so "we can finally break this pattern of unintended segregation"?
"It’s time the mayor and chancellor reform the exam for specialized high schools – and add additional schools to serve more ambitious students."
Opinion | Specialized solutions cityandstateny.com/opinion/2…
Parents should have every right to choose any school available to them and to do what they feel is best for their child! Even racist choices! Even @nhannahjones's choice of a racially segregated school!
In the video below, "I want to sit next to a white student!" is a smug, racist desire to choose an "integrated" school. You can sit wherever you want, in the classroom, but you can't force a white student to sit next to you. One parent's freedom to choose can't restrict another parent's freedom to choose.
Any racial stratification in NYC schools is due to racial congregation by parents voting with their feet, not due to de facto racial segregation by administrators or policies. Integration and School Choice are in conflict.
What underlies the racism of self-described "anti-racists"?
For some it's envy and resentment, instead of taking the initiative for self-improvement.
For others it's guilt, although they're not at fault.
But maybe they're too stupid to realize that they're hurting Asian/white students when they arbitrarily reject them in order to make room for more Latino/black students. They might wrongfully think the smart kids don't need to be challenged, that they'll do just fine without inspiration in the hyper-competitive, AI-driven global economy of the future, so we don't have to worry about them, and they'll still become great innovators and problem-solvers regardless.
Such stupidity threatens human progress and even human existence.
For @nhannahjones, @AppleseedNy and @BellVoices, racial balancing is an end, rather than a means to improve education.
This conflicts with families who prioritize academic rigor and learning over demographics. A charter school serving mostly low-income black students might produce excellent academic outcomes while remaining racially homogeneous. That's not a failure!
But Appleseed et al. want to restrict school choice and eliminate academic screens in order to force families into schools with their ideal racial quotas. This is exactly Jim Crow policy euphemized as "anti-racist".
At a crowded town hall, Nikole Hannah-Jones spent more than 40 minutes pressing Chancellor Kamar Samuels for a concrete plan to integrate NYC schools. His response left attendees underwhelmed. Here are key takeaways. chalkbeat.org/newyork/2026/1…
STEM Education Excellence retweeted
The issue is not teacher quality. Schools like Stuyvesant don’t actually have extraordinary teachers and most failing schools don’t have particularly bad ones. The reason bad schools are bad is because of the kids who attend them and because of the educational philosophies they are organized around.
Students do best in a cohort of other students whose abilities and level of preparedness match their own. Classes move faster and cover more material when all the students are at the same level of preparedness.
What’s more, in a mixed ability classroom, the lowest performing students will always get the most time and attention from the teacher, because teachers may be considered accountable for the failure of low performers, but there is no teacher incentive to push students who are at or ahead of grade level forward.
In a school that deals with students with serious problems, where few students are at grade level and a third or more are chronically absent, the students who show up, behave themselves and perform within a range deemed adequate on standardized tests are given A’s and told they are doing well.
In fact, they are far behind their peers at schools that don’t have these problems and fall further behind as they languish in classrooms where teachers are trying to triage all these problems.
Progressive school districts are run by people with education degrees who have been trained to believe that all children are equally capable and can perform equally, so the goal of these schools is to take students with a range of abilities and bring them to parity.
They believe chronically absent students do not come to school because the school is failing them, so they believe that to be a good school, they must figure out how to reach and engage those students. They believe behavior problems can be rectified with the right interventions. I cannot emphasize enough that while the schools are focused on all this dumb shit, the students who actually show up and want to learn are languishing.
In school systems where everyone is white, they always do tracking by ability, and in school systems where nobody is white, they always do differentiated classrooms because they believe tracking is a fig leaf justification for segregation, even though the schools are segregated because the whites all pulled their kids out when the schools eliminated tracking.
Nikole Hannah-Jones believes that all black people have to rise together. But the kids in the neighborhood school are going to spend their whole lives in the project they grew up in unless they go to prison.
The only way a kid in that school gets to someplace better is to leave the rest of them behind, and the only way to give a kid in that school opportunity is to create a way for them to do that.
.@USSupremeCourt may finally decide to end racial discrimination by proxy!
scotusblog.com/2026/10/justi…
@ycinnewyork @SquarePegDem @PacificLegal
"Overrepresented"
"Underrepresented"
It's time to stop using terms like these for groups.
They wrongfully imply groups should have rights and quotas are justified.
But groups are an abstract construction. A group itself is just a concept, it's not human, it has no feelings, it can't be harmed. Only individual people have feelings and can be harmed, as members of a group or otherwise. The @usconstitution's Equal Protections clause correctly protects only the most marginalized, most vulnerable group of all: the Individual.
In both the Thomas Jefferson HS case (@coalitionforTJ Suparna Dutta, @AsraNomani) and the Boston exam schools case (Bentao Cui) the 4th and 1st Circuits wrongfully held there's no harm if Asians in total still have a higher admission rate than other groups or are still "overrepresented".
Now SCOTUS can invalidate the reasoning in those rulings and set the 2nd Circuit's ruling in NYC specialized high schools (@CACAGNY) as legal precedent going forward.
Yes, @NYCMayorsOffice & @NYCSchools raised the cutoff and excluded Asian students who otherwise qualified. Our constitution only protects individuals, not groups, from racial discrimination. The 2nd Circuit ruled that the lack of an aggregate disparate impact doesn't mean there was no racial discrimination: tinyurl.com/4eru9jbf
The fact that other lower-scoring Asian students were admitted via Discovery gives ZERO consolation to the rejected Asian students. Someone rejected doesn't feel better knowing that someone else of the same race is taking their place. Lower-scoring Asians in no way "represent" the rejected Asians, or "represent" Asians as a group.
But racists think all Asians are fungible. They can't see past race, blind beyond skin-deep, and fail to recognize the very broad diversity of individuals who are Asian. @NYCMayorsOffice's racist intent was to exclude Asians in the aggregate, not just Individual Asians, but in kicking many of them out they inadvertently allowed other Asians in. That's both unconstitutional and unconscionable.
STEM Education Excellence retweeted
If NYC schools were “truly integrated” by race and class, three-quarters of students would be low-income and roughly three-fifths Black or Hispanic. And then all children would be proficient in reading and math, right?
As Weber argues, “Samuels, Mamdani, and the press are all focused on the wrong thing. They could do much more for New York City’s minority students by prioritizing academic rigor.”
And I agree. What’s the point of school integration if improving academic outcomes isn’t the goal?
city-journal.org/article/new… ~@DrJenniferWeber
STEM Education Excellence retweeted
The SHSAT is important now more than ever. Read my Letter to the Editor in the Queens Chronicle about the need for a new specialized high school in Queens.
qchron.com/opinion/letters_t…
The most critical upgrade these schools need is giving students honest grades.
Brooklyn's P.S. 307, where Nikole Hannah-Jones regrettably sent her daughter, gets rave reviews from parents today, despite persistently low reading and math scores with one in four students deemed proficient.
The new principal is “a very big upgrade” over the prior one, described by Hannah-Jones as ineffective, a mom told @matt_barnum .
This is true! @nhannahjones just publicly admitted her daughter got a poor education.
WHO is "keeping out" black & Latino kids?
Nobody!
WHAT is "keeping out" black & Latino kids?
Ask @nhannahjones' daughter!
The SHSAT only discriminates against those who are not prepared, not against any race.
The test shows Black & Latino students largely aren't prepared for high school, so @CMRestler & @CMNantashaW want the racist, quick fix of lowering expectations for blacks & Latinos.
Don't listen to Restler & Williams, and don't follow Nikole Hannah-Jones: just blaming a test your child does poorly on is hurtful when the problem is poor education.
STEM Education Excellence retweeted
Replying to @JennaRMar @LincolnRestler
Progressive policies ended gifted & accelerated programs & tracking in majority black & Latino schools that prepared them to take the same SHSAT to earn a spot. Brooklyn Tech was majority black & Latino for >20 consecutive years. Progressives like Restler caused the segregation.
STEM Education Excellence retweeted
Replying to @errollouis @LincolnRestler
Why didn't question Restler to justify himself during the interview? I don't give a shit about your heavily biased columns.
You used to rake Bill DeBlasio over the coals, now you and your regular panelists swallow or platform the dogshit they promote on NY1 without even a hint of real pushback.
This is a lie. NYC does NOT practice racial segregation. That would be illegal as it would violate the Constitution.
STEM Education Excellence retweeted
The family unit is the most local form of control that exists. They aren't your kids, @UFT.
Today, Gov. Hochul announced that New York State will opt into the Trump administration's voucher program. Giving up local control of public education to the federal government through this scheme is a failure of leadership. Gov. Hochul will bear the responsibility, but our students, educators, and families will bear the price. The UFT is disappointed in this decision and we will continue to stand with parents, educators and public school supporters to do what we can to roll back this policy and protect our classrooms. Full statement: uft.org/news/press-releases/…

ALT The image features the UFT logo at the top against a blue background. Below is a quote from Michael Mulgrew, UFT President, criticizing the transfer of local education control to the federal government through the Trump administration's private school voucher scheme. The quote highlights concerns about leadership and the impact on students, educators, and families.
Yes, @NYCMayorsOffice & @NYCSchools raised the cutoff and excluded Asian students who otherwise qualified. Our constitution only protects individuals, not groups, from racial discrimination. The 2nd Circuit ruled that the lack of an aggregate disparate impact doesn't mean there was no racial discrimination: tinyurl.com/4eru9jbf
The fact that other lower-scoring Asian students were admitted via Discovery gives ZERO consolation to the rejected Asian students. Someone rejected doesn't feel better knowing that someone else of the same race is taking their place. Lower-scoring Asians in no way "represent" the rejected Asians, or "represent" Asians as a group.
But racists think all Asians are fungible. They can't see past race, blind beyond skin-deep, and fail to recognize the very broad diversity of individuals who are Asian. @NYCMayorsOffice's racist intent was to exclude Asians in the aggregate, not just Individual Asians, but in kicking many of them out they inadvertently allowed other Asians in. That's both unconstitutional and unconscionable.

























