The 1 True VCUNT ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ A.I. Mister Metokur, The Metokur A.I. DJ, The AI Pippa Guy, A Cherokee Native #vtuber, #pippai #elitedangerous
Floating In The Black
Joined July 2017
- Tweets50.9K
- Following3.5K
- Followers2.5K
- Likes46.1K
Like clock work
To quote Tectone in all his retardedness. Again.
“Here's what we're going to do. We're going to ratio the fuck out of them. We're going to ratio the fuck out of them, bro. I got you. We only need a hundred likes and we ratio this entire person's existence. Hell nah, bro. Hell nah. VTuber space don't realize is, they've unlocked the guard, the guard dog of the VTubers, bro. Do shit talking to Naners, Athel, Lily, Silver, just to name a few, I will fucking eat you alive, brother. I will eat you alive. I will eat you alive. Straight up, I don't, better yet, better yet. Let's quadra ratio this shit, boys. We're going to sit here until this tweet has 500 likes. We're going to sit here. We're going to, we're going to fucking Exodia this bitch until they delete their post. Yep. Hell nah, fuck 'em. You're going to get banned again? Okay. Alright. Who cares? Who cares? I'm predicting they delete their tweet? Good, bro. Fuck 'em. I don't even know who the fuck this is. Anybody who shit talks Lily is an enemy, and I mean that genuinely. They're a fucking enemy, man. They are. They are. Alright, cool.”
This is way too predictable man.
⚙️Sparky's Tech Corner⚙️ retweeted
Other men being in the group chat put aside, it’s still so interesting to me that a group of Christian women who heavily believe in their faith, and now revealed that some of them were married, were being somewhat lewd with one another in private.
Even if it was all jokes, it’s still in a sense vulgar levity. Which, I would like to think, goes against their faith, at least in a traditional sense?
I don’t know. Makes me wonder how true this faith actually is in the public eye if this is what’s happening in private.
The other men who were our husbands and one other male vtuber who was added later for a collab weeks later by you. the original members were me, Celeste and Ember assuming all of us were female considering the group chat you were in was named "vfoid/glizzy gals". The train comment was also made in a chat that only had me, Celeste, Ember, and my husband in it.
Were those strictly female only spaces? technically no and I don't think I ever personally claimed they were.
It still doesn't change the fact that I would not have interacted with Ember in the way that I did or would have been okay with the way he interacted with me if I had known he was a man.
Why would anyone waste their time? You’ve acted in bad faith far too many times to expect anyone to trust you to have an honest conversation. You’ve lied too many times to count.
And whatever happened to that 1,000 CCV requirement? Did that idea fall flat on its face? LMAO. 😂
⚙️Sparky's Tech Corner⚙️ retweeted
Remember how everyone, including @darlingstrawbie @Rev_says_desu and @Tectone all jumped on Mujin for using the word "predator" to describe Sykkuno for lying about being single and sleeping with fans, because while it's technically not wrong, it was the loosest use of the term?
So, hopefully, this will be my last post on this whole mess. I said last night that if evidence came out, I’d give no quarter. Well, now that more information has surfaced, here’s where I stand.
Apparently, a group chat involving Ember was uncovered, containing some questionable memes. However, what conveniently got left out of the initial narrative was that the chat’s owner had figured out Ember was a guy and had no issue with it. It was also a mixed group, including other men who were husbands or streaming collaborators. We know this because the owner came forward and called out the bullshit surrounding how the chat was being presented.
Let’s be clear, I still believe Ember was wrong not to disclose that he was a man in private interactions where that information could affect trust and boundaries. I’ve said from the beginning that I don’t support misleading people in private DMs or voice calls. That position hasn’t changed.
But there’s a difference between acknowledging a legitimate breach of trust and deliberately presenting information in a way that makes the situation look far more malicious than the evidence supports.
When people involved allegedly had concerns but never voiced them, when the chat was presented as exclusively female despite being mixed, and when questionable memes were highlighted without establishing actual predatory behavior, what exactly are we supposed to conclude?
I can acknowledge that trust was broken without buying into every accusation or implication being thrown around.
The original issue deserves scrutiny, but so does the way this entire situation was exposed and presented. Leaving out important context and framing things to create a more damning impression isn’t accountability. It’s manipulation.
At this point, I doubt there’s much more to come out, and I’m ready to put this behind me. But if there’s one thing this entire mess has reinforced, it’s that you need to be careful about trusting people online. At best, you might get lied to. At worst, someone you thought was on your side might put a knife in your back.
And that warning applies to EVERYONE involved in this mess.
Have a good day. I’m done with this shit.
Okay, now that I’m home and new information has come out, where do I stand?
Well, pretty much in the same fucking spot.
I still think Strawb is 100% a snake, and apparently, she’s been a pretty shitty friend to others as well, putting some of them in very difficult positions for no reason.
I said yesterday that even if it turned out Ember was a guy, IT WOULDN’T CHANGE A DAMN THING FOR ME.
Why? Because I’m not a parasocial retard. That’s why.
I mainly know of Ember through Elite Dangerous as a Fuel Rat, and I’d still have no problem flying with them in game sometime. A lot of Ember’s points, opinions, and stances don’t suddenly become invalid based on what’s swinging between their legs.
The needle doesn’t budge for me.
If anything, kudos to Ember for handling this situation as well as they have so far. And if Ember wants to be a babiniku, cool. That’s their business.
Oh, and I also looked over the synopsis of that old fictional story everyone keeps losing their minds over.
Fifty Shades is Worse in my mind.
And guess what? I STILL DON’T FUCKING CARE. IT’S FICTION.
Now, with all that said, I do have one issue with how Ember apparently handled things, and I want to make a very clear distinction here.
I’m NOT talking about streaming.
From what I’ve seen, Ember’s streams were pretty straightforward. I haven’t personally seen evidence of catfishing within that context, and simply presenting as a female character online isn’t inherently wrong.
Where I draw the line is potentially misleading people in private interactions.
Collaborating with other creators, particularly women but also men, having private voice calls, and exchanging DMs introduces a different dynamic if those people are operating under an assumption about your identity that you’ve knowingly encouraged but haven’t been honest about.
And before someone twists my words, I AM NOT ACCUSING EMBER OF SEXUAL MISCONDUCT OR CLAIMING ANYTHING INAPPROPRIATE HAPPENED.
I’m saying that if someone knowingly misrepresents themselves to gain access to private conversations, personal trust, romantic attention, or situations that another person would not have consented to had they known the truth, that’s a legitimate issue.
There’s a difference between playing a character online and deliberately deceiving someone in a personal relationship or private conversations.
That distinction matters to me.
But I’m not going to assume that happened simply because Ember presented as female. Someone’s gender presentation alone is not evidence of manipulation.
If documented evidence comes out showing that Ember deliberately exploited someone’s trust or boundaries, then I will absolutely call that out, and I will give no quarter.
I have standards, and I apply those standards regardless of who the person is.
But I want actual evidence. Not rumors, not assumptions, not selectively cropped screenshots, and not another internet game of telephone.
I hope Ember was completely straightforward during today’s stream and that nothing comes out later showing deliberate deception or misconduct.
Until then, I’m not moving based on speculation.
And none of this suddenly excuses how Strawb handled the situation, either. Two things can be true at once. Ember can deserve legitimate criticism for their own actions, if supported by evidence, while Strawb can still deserve criticism for the timing, methods, and treatment of someone who supported her for a long time. Because end of the day, she made a lucky guess, still nothing backed it up besides Ember on stream saying its true.
One doesn’t magically cancel out the other.
Honestly, this entire situation has been a massive pile of internet bullshit, and it’s another reminder of why I keep people online at arm’s length.
people wonder why I’m such a hard ass about trust and why I demand receipts before buying into someone’s accusations.
The 2 people above
This is exactly fucking why
Unless something substantial and verifiable comes out, Im done
⚙️Sparky's Tech Corner⚙️ retweeted
why are the religiously inclined trying to be around people who do excessive lewding in general?
male or female, that actually shouldn't be the kind of company you seek. and your husband was rather shocked you were egging on lewd commentary given his public remarks to me when i did not know it was your husband.
my advice: say you overreacted on presentation, but its because you were lied to and feel betrayed.
every single thing you add actually looks worse for you because people have to take YOU into context now.
you were lied to, this should have been open and shut.
now we have to play 20 questions because you choose to misrepresent things. now banana, who made this chat? this group? and all of you, are arguing publicly as a spectacle for everyone else.
this could have been taken care of privately, the group could have kicked him, then come out with a statement like
we confirmed ember was a man after confronting him in dms. he lied to us for months/years and has been presenting himself as a woman this entire time. here are posts where he claims to be a woman, here are dms where he continues these claims even in private. while he never asked us for nudes, personal effects, or got disgustingly predatory with us, we still feel our trust was violated and for that want to share that with others so they may have the truth
you could have even done a FUUUCCCKKKTROONNNSSSS in there if you wanted to be edgy.
all in all, i rate this a 6/10 experience. very strange all the way around.
sorry you got lied to, hope yall sort things.
“I want to verify facts” BITCH you been twisting the truth and hiding shit from view since you opened your mouth, your digging a fucking hole, take my advice and stop because you all ready look like a fucking snake.
Old song i made,…. Fuel Rats And Frag Cannons youtu.be/qhunxh9capk?is=-NQq… via @YouTube
⚙️Sparky's Tech Corner⚙️ retweeted
I avoided commenting on this because I wanted to wait for more information and examples. But there's something that's come up that has me really annoyed now.
First, my opinion on what's shown in the screenshots. Which probably won't surprise any of you:
This is it? These are just casual conversations between friends. Yes, even in mixed sex friend groups. I would know. I HAVE touched grass before and have been around a variety of crowds.
Even more, they seem like conversations between women and specifically a gay man. I didn't know much about Ember before all this drama outside of being a decent person. And yesterday was the first time I ever attended one of his streams. So I don't actually know if he's gay, but in these screenshots he really comes across as one.
Maybe Ember really brings out his feminine side, idk.
Either way, these screenshots are a very terrible attempt at painting Ember in a bad light.
Now, what was it that has me annoyed enough to speak preemptively before more examples have been shown?
BananaJuJu and Leaflit have both confirmed that there were OTHER MEN included in the chat.
This revaluation has me losing my mind, dude. What are doing? Seriously?
Was Ember wrong for lying? Yes. Was trust broken? Yes. Does that excuse how Strawb went about it? In my opinion, no. Especially not after all this.
I'm so tired, man. This really does come across as a witch hunt at some point.
I'm practically begging for there to be something incredibly condemning against Ember past the gender thing so we can get everyone back on board again.
This drama is so retarded.
My question, why is strawb in this chat with everyone being lewd not screaming thats not very christian of you, because she been doing that ALL THE FUCKING TIME in public.
ALRIGHT. IT LOOKS LIKE I WAS WRONG.
This topic appears to have some staying power.
Thanks to Maria, people are now feeling obligated to defend a very nice person. Yes, its true, this man who lied about being a waman was very kind, and autistically asked for permission to even be "lewd". He is a liar though. And liars must be shunned imo.
It has since come out:
This all girls chat is not an all girls chat at all, there were known other men according to Banana.
Maria's magnum opus shows herself egging on behavior- according to her husband, this is a deviation of expected behavior. Now i am not interested in causing issues for him but she brought it into the light, and he admitted he does not know whats in that chat.
However, the entire context of the situation has changed thanks to Maria. Thank you Maria, for wasting everyone's time.
Maria was the one who made Ember sound like a massive sex pest then shows ember being nice. this is probably why people have a need to defend him.
He lied. trust broken. life is too short to continue to trust a liar online who ultimately you will never meet. That was not a "character" because you dont "character" in private chat like that. stop it. this is all very silly. its okay that information as it comes out changes the opinion on the situation. This was not a man innocently using a waman wow avatar. this was someone who said i am waman to other waman and that is indeed violation of trust.
but MORE CURIOUSLY. is the hypocrisy and exaggerations around it all.
ON TOP OF THAT are my questions below.
the second image is a response from the husband who i did not know was the husband of Maria. The general context is about her screenshot she shared and i showed him where she egged on behavior. that was a deviation from expected behavior on his part- the husband. the rest of that tweet is explaining how someone might end up following me and irrelevant to showing evidence of deviation of expected behavior.
Maria made a vague tweet before posting "evidence" and her "evidence" is HER egging it on. What would an uncurated screenshot look like? how do we know they did not all egg on ember? how do we know there are not more men (thanks to banana we have an answer to that). how do we know they were not all engaging in the expected female degeneracy?
IMO: many things are true at once. also why is the person who insinuated Ember is a predator with vague posting wishing ember well? not so violated now?? i dont wish "violators" well.
and again, lastly. WHY IN THE FUCK ARE THE RELIGIOUSLY INCLINED TRYING TO BE IN THE DMS OF THE NATURALLY LEWD THEN GETTING UPSET WHEN THE NATURALLY LEWD ARE BEING LEWD? not that ember was even being fucking lewd in those "evidence shots". WHAT ARE WE DOIN.
⚙️Sparky's Tech Corner⚙️ retweeted
ALRIGHT. IT LOOKS LIKE I WAS WRONG.
This topic appears to have some staying power.
Thanks to Maria, people are now feeling obligated to defend a very nice person. Yes, its true, this man who lied about being a waman was very kind, and autistically asked for permission to even be "lewd". He is a liar though. And liars must be shunned imo.
It has since come out:
This all girls chat is not an all girls chat at all, there were known other men according to Banana.
Maria's magnum opus shows herself egging on behavior- according to her husband, this is a deviation of expected behavior. Now i am not interested in causing issues for him but she brought it into the light, and he admitted he does not know whats in that chat.
However, the entire context of the situation has changed thanks to Maria. Thank you Maria, for wasting everyone's time.
Maria was the one who made Ember sound like a massive sex pest then shows ember being nice. this is probably why people have a need to defend him.
He lied. trust broken. life is too short to continue to trust a liar online who ultimately you will never meet. That was not a "character" because you dont "character" in private chat like that. stop it. this is all very silly. its okay that information as it comes out changes the opinion on the situation. This was not a man innocently using a waman wow avatar. this was someone who said i am waman to other waman and that is indeed violation of trust.
but MORE CURIOUSLY. is the hypocrisy and exaggerations around it all.
ON TOP OF THAT are my questions below.
the second image is a response from the husband who i did not know was the husband of Maria. The general context is about her screenshot she shared and i showed him where she egged on behavior. that was a deviation from expected behavior on his part- the husband. the rest of that tweet is explaining how someone might end up following me and irrelevant to showing evidence of deviation of expected behavior.
Maria made a vague tweet before posting "evidence" and her "evidence" is HER egging it on. What would an uncurated screenshot look like? how do we know they did not all egg on ember? how do we know there are not more men (thanks to banana we have an answer to that). how do we know they were not all engaging in the expected female degeneracy?
IMO: many things are true at once. also why is the person who insinuated Ember is a predator with vague posting wishing ember well? not so violated now?? i dont wish "violators" well.
and again, lastly. WHY IN THE FUCK ARE THE RELIGIOUSLY INCLINED TRYING TO BE IN THE DMS OF THE NATURALLY LEWD THEN GETTING UPSET WHEN THE NATURALLY LEWD ARE BEING LEWD? not that ember was even being fucking lewd in those "evidence shots". WHAT ARE WE DOIN.
Hold up. Why are supposedly religious women in a group chat being lewd together. Making lewd remarks. Egging on lewdness.
Why is it suddenly ok for women to be lewd if lewdness is not ok usually?
Why are people discussing their deep sexual things with strangers online knowing anyone could be lying at any time?
Why are supposedly religious women also actively engaging with lewd people, male or female? Why arent you being the custodian of your own domain and ensuring everyone is of the approved respectful and pure mindset?
Oh no. Oh no chat i did that thing where i asked questions and i hate it.
God once i hit my hagday, i really do just treat this like a nonsenical boomerlog.
Feelsgoodman
⚙️Sparky's Tech Corner⚙️ retweeted
With this whole Ember Paradox drama going on I wanna say this.
I have people I barely know in my DMs all of a sudden, trying to dig up stuff about her, even if they are fully unrelated, just to spin a narrative.
This is absolutely disgusting behavior and I will not be part of such a campaign, just to get a few likes.
I could not give less of a shit who you are behind your avatar, because this is the point of Vtubing, it is all make belief.
if you start sharing more personal things in DMs that just women can be a part of (what we doing ladies? what are these super private messages that needs to be protected from men?) wouldn´t you make sure WHO you are talking to??? is it just me or has everyone gone mad
what are we doing? its the internet! if you like to know more just ASK
And let’s not forget, Strawb was allegedly in these group chats for MONTHS without saying anything, and Juju has confirmed there were other men involved too. So the issue isn’t simply that Ember was called out. It’s HOW this was handled. If there were genuine concerns, why sit on them for months and then bring everything out in the most damaging way possible, making it look far more malicious than necessary? For what fucking reason? I’m actually with Madam Savvy on this one: this whole situation reeks of snake-like behavior. You can have legitimate criticisms of Ember while still recognizing that the way this was handled was unnecessarily vindictive. It’s not the callout itself, it’s the timing, the presentation, and the apparent intent behind it.
⚙️Sparky's Tech Corner⚙️ retweeted
I think it’s peak irony some of you VTubers and content creators are going so hard on the “I hate liars” when you are friends with select people that have a long history of lying and using lies to try and destroy people.
And some of you downplay those people being liars and bad actors because “Oh well, they’re nice to me.” Some of you that follow me that are friends with said liars know they lied about even me and some of my friends online. You have no right to grandstand on that when you downplay it because IT’S YOUR FRIEND doing the lying!
⚙️Sparky's Tech Corner⚙️ retweeted
i kept reading over it looking for something horrific. that was "hard to look at".
this is fuck all. now if he was saying things like tell me about your panties, did it hurt when you first had sex tell me in graphic detail, or give me selfies, then by all means! expose away!!! but they egg the person on who isnt evn sure about crossing lines and then shows ember being supportive.
like, REALLY FUCKING SUPPORTIVE.
not manipulation before or after. no begging for money, private access, nothing.
shit like this honestly, im about to block OP. this some snake ass shit i dont want around me
⚙️Sparky's Tech Corner⚙️ retweeted
there's no canceling here
ember admitted they were a man and said they aren't going to stop streaming and I don't think they should stop either
when you lie to people, they are going to be rightfully upset. if ember hadn't been called out they would not have come out and admitted they were a man, they did so because they were caught publicly and not in dms where people won't bring it up
only time will tell if people decide to forgive and rebuild trust. ember broke peoples trust and now it is up to people if they want to give ember a chance to rebuild that trust
TL;DR: I don't give a shit if Ember is a guy, a girl, or a babiniku, and the fictional story is irrelevant. My concern is the possibility of knowingly letting women believe you're a woman while privately DMing, VCing, and collaborating with them without being upfront about who you are. Streaming as a female avatar is one thing, potentially misleading women in private interactions where identity can affect trust and boundaries is another. I'm NOT accusing Ember of anything beyond what's actually established, but if documented proof comes out that they deliberately exploited that trust for personal gain, I'll call it out. Until then, show me facts, not speculation.
Okay, now that I’m home and new information has come out, where do I stand?
Well, pretty much in the same fucking spot.
I still think Strawb is 100% a snake, and apparently, she’s been a pretty shitty friend to others as well, putting some of them in very difficult positions for no reason.
I said yesterday that even if it turned out Ember was a guy, IT WOULDN’T CHANGE A DAMN THING FOR ME.
Why? Because I’m not a parasocial retard. That’s why.
I mainly know of Ember through Elite Dangerous as a Fuel Rat, and I’d still have no problem flying with them in game sometime. A lot of Ember’s points, opinions, and stances don’t suddenly become invalid based on what’s swinging between their legs.
The needle doesn’t budge for me.
If anything, kudos to Ember for handling this situation as well as they have so far. And if Ember wants to be a babiniku, cool. That’s their business.
Oh, and I also looked over the synopsis of that old fictional story everyone keeps losing their minds over.
Fifty Shades is Worse in my mind.
And guess what? I STILL DON’T FUCKING CARE. IT’S FICTION.
Now, with all that said, I do have one issue with how Ember apparently handled things, and I want to make a very clear distinction here.
I’m NOT talking about streaming.
From what I’ve seen, Ember’s streams were pretty straightforward. I haven’t personally seen evidence of catfishing within that context, and simply presenting as a female character online isn’t inherently wrong.
Where I draw the line is potentially misleading people in private interactions.
Collaborating with other creators, particularly women but also men, having private voice calls, and exchanging DMs introduces a different dynamic if those people are operating under an assumption about your identity that you’ve knowingly encouraged but haven’t been honest about.
And before someone twists my words, I AM NOT ACCUSING EMBER OF SEXUAL MISCONDUCT OR CLAIMING ANYTHING INAPPROPRIATE HAPPENED.
I’m saying that if someone knowingly misrepresents themselves to gain access to private conversations, personal trust, romantic attention, or situations that another person would not have consented to had they known the truth, that’s a legitimate issue.
There’s a difference between playing a character online and deliberately deceiving someone in a personal relationship or private conversations.
That distinction matters to me.
But I’m not going to assume that happened simply because Ember presented as female. Someone’s gender presentation alone is not evidence of manipulation.
If documented evidence comes out showing that Ember deliberately exploited someone’s trust or boundaries, then I will absolutely call that out, and I will give no quarter.
I have standards, and I apply those standards regardless of who the person is.
But I want actual evidence. Not rumors, not assumptions, not selectively cropped screenshots, and not another internet game of telephone.
I hope Ember was completely straightforward during today’s stream and that nothing comes out later showing deliberate deception or misconduct.
Until then, I’m not moving based on speculation.
And none of this suddenly excuses how Strawb handled the situation, either. Two things can be true at once. Ember can deserve legitimate criticism for their own actions, if supported by evidence, while Strawb can still deserve criticism for the timing, methods, and treatment of someone who supported her for a long time. Because end of the day, she made a lucky guess, still nothing backed it up besides Ember on stream saying its true.
One doesn’t magically cancel out the other.
Honestly, this entire situation has been a massive pile of internet bullshit, and it’s another reminder of why I keep people online at arm’s length.
people wonder why I’m such a hard ass about trust and why I demand receipts before buying into someone’s accusations.
The 2 people above
This is exactly fucking why
Unless something substantial and verifiable comes out, Im done