Dex trader || Content writer || Airdrop hunter || Ambassador || Telegram: https://xitter.cf/t.co/4kLo0KFPSR
Joined June 2026
- Tweets18.3K
- Following5.1K
- Followers4.1K
- Likes16.3K
Sabit retweeted
Top 20 of the Rebate Campaign: paid.
Total USD pot $2,000.
100 USDT each is in the wallet you saved in your Starlist account, as USDG on Robinhood Chain or USDC on other chains.
Ranks 21 to 100: your share of the 1% $REBATE airdrop goes out tomorrow, when @Rebatelaunch launches.
Prepare yourselves for more to come with Starlist ๐
๐The Rebate Campaign is final:
931 creators ranked, 22,281 posts, 13M views.
Top 20: 100 USDT each.
Ranks 21 to 100: a share of the 1% $REBATE airdrop.
Winners, add your wallet in your Starlist account. USDT for the top 20 goes out soon, airdrop tomorrow when @Rebatelaunch launches.
Full board, every post and its grade: starlist.world/launches/rebaโฆ
No wallet saved yet?
Profile โ Wallets โ Paste
Both payouts go to the address saved there.
Good night creators.
Understanding Soft Staking in the Hazels Ecosystem
One important concept to understand about @0xhazels is soft staking and how it differs from traditional NFT staking.
In many staking systems, users must transfer their assets into a smart contract or lock them for a specific period. Soft staking takes a different approach. With Hazels, your NFT remains in your wallet while you activate staking through a wallet signature.
Why does this matter?
First, you retain custody of your NFT instead of sending it to a staking contract. Second, there is no traditional lockup period. Third, staking can unlock ecosystem benefits, including eligible creator campaign boosts and access to other Hazels features.
However, keeping an NFT in your wallet does not mean every benefit is automatic or guaranteed. Eligibility and campaign rules still matter, and transferring your NFT away can end its staking status.
This is an interesting model because it connects ownership with participation without requiring the usual asset lockup.
The bigger lesson is that NFT utility is not just about adding features. It is about designing those features around how people actually use and manage their assets.
Sabit retweeted
$20M is the target. Can 1win get there?
The 1win token sale is already making noise, with $6.3M in deposits reported and the $20M milestone now up for debate.
XO has turned that question into a market where traders can take a side and back their own predictions.
Current odds: 69% YES and 49% NO
My take? I lean YES. With $6.3M already in, the real question is whether momentum can bring in another $13.7M before the sale closes. Thatโs a big gap, but one worth watching.
Will 1win cross $20M, or will the hype fall short?
Check out the market on @xomarket and decide where you stand.
๐ค Paid partnership
๐จ Now live on XO, created by @KnightPredict!
Token sales are so back with @1win from the iGaming world using it for gaming activity and buyback-burn.
With $6.3M deposited already, can the 1win token sale cross $20M?
Sabit retweeted
Quantum computing could force crypto networks to rethink their security sooner than expected.
In the Market Bubble podcast, StarkWare CEO Eli Ben Sasson explained why @Starknet is researching an independent L1 instead of simply waiting for Ethereum's post quantum upgrades.
His concern is the dependency chain. Even if Starknet's own cryptography is ready, parts of its security still rely on Ethereum infrastructure that must undergo its own transition.
That creates a timing problem.
Starknet's STARK proofs already use hash based cryptography, giving it an advantage in preparing for quantum threats. The challenge is extending that protection across the wider network, including the components it doesn't fully control as an L2.
An independent L1 could give Starknet more freedom to coordinate those upgrades, with full quantum resistance by 2027 as the goal discussed.
Nothing is decided yet. The community backed research, not an actual departure from Ethereum.
What makes this worth watching is the question behind Eli's argument: if quantum safe infrastructure becomes urgent, will relying on another network limit how quickly you can respond?
Watch Eli explain the reasoning.
Sabit retweeted
Say you have $100K on-chain.
You want to transfer it, earn yield, or use it in a financial strategy.
Why should everyone watching the blockchain know exactly how much you moved?
Thatโs the problem @primus_labs is approaching with FHE.
Instead of decrypting sensitive values every time the system needs to work with them, computation can happen while the data remains encrypted.
So the asset can remain useful without making every underlying amount public.
And this is where I think privacy infrastructure gets more interesting:
privacy shouldn't mean taking your assets out of the financial system.
It should mean having more control over what the system can see.
That feels much closer to what institutional on-chain finance actually needs.
A screenshot can show you a number.
It can't prove where that number came from.
That's one of the problems @primus_labs is trying to tackle with zkTLS.
The interesting part isn't simply accessing Web2 data.
It's being able to generate a cryptographic proof that the data came from the claimed source without handing the whole underlying dataset to whoever is verifying it.
Think about the implications:
๐ Your financial information can remain private.
๐ The application can still verify the relevant claim.
๐ And the proof can potentially be used onchain.
That's a much more useful model than:
โTrust me, I checked the website.โ
For me, this is where privacy infrastructure starts becoming genuinely practical.
s.kaito.ai/EhhSL0u
Sabit retweeted
Stablecoins are increasingly a financial infrastructure question, not just a crypto-market question.
On October 21, the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency finalized a rule implementing the GENIUS Act for payment stablecoin issuers and certain related activities within its jurisdiction. The rule is scheduled to take effect on January 18, 2027.
The framework addresses reserve assets, redemption, custody, risk management, reporting, and supervision. Anti-money-laundering and sanctions-related requirements are being addressed separately.
For traditional financial institutions, this could create opportunities in custody, payments, and digital-asset infrastructure. For stablecoin businesses, clearer standards may support trust while increasing compliance obligations.
The distinction that matters: a payment stablecoin is not automatically equivalent to a bank deposit, nor does the framework itself guarantee universal government insurance.
The next phase will be measured by implementation, issuer eligibility, redemption reliability, and real demand for stablecoin-based payments.
This is a significant regulatory milestone. Whether it becomes a turning point for adoption will depend on how effectively the framework works in practice.
#BingX @BingXOfficial
Sabit retweeted
i got this message today:
6 months ago, a message like this would've stayed in my head all day.
i'd keep thinking about what i did wrong, what i could've said better or how i could've changed their mind.
now? i just reply โall good, thanksโ and move on.
building a business has taught me that not everyone will say yes.
some people don't need what you're offering. some won't see the value. others just aren't the right fit.
and that's okay.
you can't control how people respond to you. you can only control how you improve, how you show up and whether you keep going.
rejection feels different when you stop seeing every โnoโ as a sign that you're not good enough. ๐ค
i took over a client's account 3 weeks ago and the numbers went from:
Impressions: 111.9K (+41%) โ 300.7K (+83%)
Likes: 1.9K (+16%) โ 5K (+68%)
Profile visits: 1.7K (+125%) โ 4.9K (+112%)
New follows: 835 (+126%) โ 1.7K (+50%)
and no, i didnโt spam low effort replies.
just showing up in conversations that matter and giving people a reason to check out the account.
a lot of founders are sleeping on reply marketing.
you can have a good product, a solid account and valuable things to say but still struggle to get noticed.
that's where the right reply guy comes in.
if you're a founder, creator or brand looking to grow on X, i can help you do the same.
DMs are open.
The first 24 hours in @RaidLords could matter more than most new players realize.
When you enter the game, you are not simply getting a village and sending troops into battle. You are starting with limited resources, one builder, a Keep to develop, and decisions that can shape how you prepare for your first raid.
Here is what makes the early game interesting.
You begin with a Keep, one builder, 1,000 gold, 1,000 essence, and a 24 hour shield. You also get one free building upgrade finish. That gives you an opportunity to start developing your village before you face the full pressure of other raiders.
But where should you begin?
Gold is used to build and upgrade structures. Essence supports things like the Laboratory and walls. Your builder is responsible for construction and upgrades, so choosing what to work on first becomes an important part of your early strategy.
Then there is your army.
According to the game guide, troop training is free, and your first 20 troops are ready immediately. After that, different troop types have their own training times. A Barbarian takes 15 seconds, while a Giant takes 30 seconds.
That creates an interesting decision for new players.
Do you focus on developing your village and strengthening its defenses, or prepare your army so you can start attacking other lords?
Raids last three minutes, and there are three ways to earn stars: destroy 50% of the village, destroy the Keep, or destroy everything. Your results determine the stars and trophies you collect, while successful raids can bring back loot.
Building a strong village and planning an effective attack are two different challenges. A player who focuses entirely on attacking may overlook the importance of defense, while someone who only develops their village could miss opportunities to collect resources through raids.
That is why I am interested in how @RaidLords balances village development, troop selection, and battle strategy when the game opens.
There is also a progression system to consider. The Keep can reach level 12, while Shadow Essence becomes available from Keep 7 and powers shadow troops and heroes. That gives players another milestone to work toward beyond the first few upgrades.
For me, the interesting part is not just how many troops or buildings the game offers. It is how players combine their available resources, choose their upgrades, and adapt their strategies as their villages develop.
If you are planning to join, the question is simple:
what would you prioritize during your first 24 hours: resource production, stronger defenses, or preparing your army for raids?
Join the @RaidLords waitlist: ๐
raidlords.com/waitlist?ref=Sโฆ
Sabit retweeted
๐The Rebate Campaign is final:
931 creators ranked, 22,281 posts, 13M views.
Top 20: 100 USDT each.
Ranks 21 to 100: a share of the 1% $REBATE airdrop.
Winners, add your wallet in your Starlist account. USDT for the top 20 goes out soon, airdrop tomorrow when @Rebatelaunch launches.
Full board, every post and its grade: starlist.world/launches/rebaโฆ
No wallet saved yet?
Profile โ Wallets โ Paste
Both payouts go to the address saved there.
๐New campaign live:
Starlist ร @RebateLaunch
Post about Rebate launchpad, climb the board, and share 2,000 USDT + 1% airdrop.
Create. Shine. Earn.
starlist.world/launches
Sabit retweeted
Starlist launch rewards are out. ๐
Top 10, check your wallet. Paid in USDG on Robinhood Chain, or USDC on Ethereum or Solana, to the address saved in your Starlist account.
Next up: A new project will be joining us tomorrow with way bigger rewards!
Keep your notifications on, keep posting, keep inviting.
The first Starlist launch has closed and the board is final.
Congratulations to our top 10 creators. 1,155 creators ranked over five days, and you set the pace.
starlist.world/launches/starโฆ
Winners: make sure your wallet address is saved in your Starlist account before the payout.
> Sign in at starlist.world
> open Account
> add your address.
*payout will be completed within the next 12 hours.
Sabit retweeted
Gold check unlocked.
Starlist is now a verified organization on X.
1,500+ creators in one week, and we're just getting started.
Sabit retweeted
A week ago the counter was at zero.
Tonight it passed 1,000,000 STARS. 1,595 of you earned them, one post at a time.
The next million is yours too.
One thing I find important about @RebateLaunch is how it approaches transparency before a trade even happens.
On Rebate Pad, buyers are meant to see the bonus details in the swap quote before confirming a transaction. That gives users a chance to understand the terms instead of discovering the incentives after they have already bought.
I think this matters because a launchpad should do more than attract attention. It should help people make informed decisions.
The other detail worth watching is what happens after launch. Clear rates are a good starting point, but liquidity, trading activity, and actual execution will determine how the model performs in practice.
For me, transparency is most valuable when users can verify the rules and judge the results for themselves.
That is the part of RebateLaunch I will be watching as Rebate Pad develops.
Good morning creators.
One detail that can easily get overlooked when evaluating a launchpad is how much the rules encourage people to think beyond the first buy.
With @RebateLaunch, I'm interested in the relationship between entry bonuses and the incentives for holding.
A bonus can make a launch more attractive to someone entering the market, but the longer term question is whether the project can maintain enough activity to keep participants interested.
That depends on more than token rewards. People also need a reason to believe in the project, understand its direction, and follow its progress.
This is why I wouldn't judge a launch by its bonus rate alone. I'd compare the incentives, examine the liquidity, and look for evidence of genuine participation.
The most appealing numbers aren't always attached to the strongest opportunity.
For me, a well designed launch should make the terms clear while giving users enough information to make their own decisions.
The incentive gets your attention. The fundamentals deserve your research.
Always DYOR.
Good morning creators.
A token launch can look attractive on paper, but the details behind the incentives deserve just as much attention as the headline numbers.
That's one reason I'm following @RebateLaunch.
When comparing launches, I'd look beyond the bonus percentage and consider how the full setup works. What portion is allocated to buyer bonuses? How much is reserved for holder payouts? And what fees apply to each transaction?
These details help explain what the creator is prioritizing and what buyers should expect.
A higher bonus might make a launch more appealing at first glance, but it doesn't automatically mean better value. The project's demand, liquidity, and ability to sustain activity still matter.
I also like the importance of fixed terms. When the rules are clear from the beginning, users have a better chance of comparing opportunities without worrying about settings changing later.
My approach is simple: understand the mechanics first, assess the project second, and never let a reward percentage make the decision for you.
Good incentives can attract attention. Clear information helps people decide whether that attention is deserved.
Always DYOR.
Good morning creators.
One thing worth paying attention to with @RebateLaunch is how launch settings can shape the decisions people make.
A creator isn't just choosing percentages. They're deciding how to balance the incentive for buying with the reason to keep holding.
A larger bonus may catch attention early, while a stronger holder payout may appeal to people looking beyond the first transaction. Neither choice guarantees success, because the project still needs real demand and consistent activity.
What matters is whether buyers can understand those trade offs before they enter.
I believe good launch design should make the important information easy to compare, not force users to figure out complicated mechanics on their own.
Flexibility is useful when it helps creators make better decisions. It becomes a problem when extra options create confusion.
For me, the best approach is clear rules, understandable rates, and enough information for everyone to know what they're choosing.
Always DYOR.
I used to think the way to get more from a reward system was to split my money across several wallets. I tried it once on another platform, and it only cost me extra gas.
That's why one line on the Rebate Pad homepage stood out to me: splitting across wallets changes nothing, because shares are proportional.
Payouts follow how much you hold and for how long. One wallet with $500 gets the same share as five wallets with $100 each. The bonus rate is the same for every wallet too, whale or first-timer.
What that means for me:
โ No wallet games. I don't need to spread my position around to chase a better deal.
โ No special access. Nobody gets a better rate because of size or timing, and the snipe tax keeps bots from grabbing the bonus first.
โ Time is the lever. The only thing that grows my share is holding longer, from 1x to 1.5x on day 3 and 2x from day 7.
One thing to remember: holdings under $1 are left out of a payout round, so very tiny positions may earn nothing. I'd keep each position big enough to count.
The app opens tomorrow and I haven't used it yet, so I'm not promising results. I just like a system where the simple way to play is also the fair way.
When the rules reward patience and not tricks, there's less to figure out and more time to research the token itself.
@starlisting partners with @RebateLaunch so creators can post and earn.
Good morning creators.
Everyone talks about what buyers get on Rebate Pad. I keep thinking about the other side: if I were the one launching, what would I set?
The creator picks the pair token, the bonus rate for buyers and the payout rate for holders. Then it's locked. Supply is one billion, and liquidity and a locked treasury are set up in one transaction. Nobody can change it afterward, including me.
Here's how I'd think about it:
โ I'd pick the pair token first. A dollar pair like USDG means holders get paid in something simple to understand.
โ I'd think about who I'm building for. The bonus and payouts share a 9% cap, so I can't max out both. A bigger bonus rewards the entry. A bigger payout rewards the people who stay.
โ I'd lean toward holders. A big bonus gets attention for a day, but payouts come from trading, so I'd want a community that sticks around and keeps the token active.
โ I'd treat the one-way switch seriously. Sending payouts to holders instead of myself can never be switched back, so I'd only do it if I meant it.
The part that makes me careful is that I get one shot. If I set the rates wrong, there's no fixing it later. I'd rather spend a week planning than regret it forever.
I haven't launched anything on it yet, since the app opens tomorrow, so this is just how I'd approach it.
If you're thinking of launching, which would you set higher, the bonus or the payout?
@starlisting partners with @RebateLaunch so creators can post and earn.
$REBATE #RebateLaunchpad
Good day creators.
Tomorrow at 17:00 UTC, Rebate Pad opens on Robinhood Chain. The first thing I'll follow isn't the price. It's the fee.
I learned this the hard way. I used to watch the chart and ignore where the money moved. Now I ask where a platform earns, and where that money goes.
Here's what I know about $REBATE. It launches on the same rules as every other token: 3% bonus tokens on buys, 0.7% holder payouts in USDG and a 0.3% platform fee. The platform fee from every launch (0.7%) and from $REBATE itself (0.3%) is used to buy $REBATE and burn it. That happens through automated dip buys below its price, plus buys at the market price.
So the burn runs on usage. More launches and more trading mean more fees, and more fees mean more buying and burning.
Here's what I'll watch:
โ How many launches go live, and whether people keep creating them after day one
โ How active each token trades, since that's where the fees come from
โ Whether the burns are visible on chain, so I can check them myself
One honest limit. A burn is a mechanism, not a promise of price. If activity slows, the fee loop slows too, and I'd rather know that before I take a position than after.
I haven't seen the live numbers yet, so I'm not calling anything. I'm just going in knowing what to track.
Follow the fee, and the story gets easier to read.
@starlisting partners with @RebateLaunch so creators can post and earn.
$REBATE #RebateLaunchpad
Sabit retweeted
Good day creators.
Tomorrow at 17:00 UTC, Rebate Pad opens on Robinhood Chain. The first thing I'll follow isn't the price. It's the fee.
I learned this the hard way. I used to watch the chart and ignore where the money moved. Now I ask where a platform earns, and where that money goes.
Here's what I know about $REBATE. It launches on the same rules as every other token: 3% bonus tokens on buys, 0.7% holder payouts in USDG and a 0.3% platform fee. The platform fee from every launch (0.7%) and from $REBATE itself (0.3%) is used to buy $REBATE and burn it. That happens through automated dip buys below its price, plus buys at the market price.
So the burn runs on usage. More launches and more trading mean more fees, and more fees mean more buying and burning.
Here's what I'll watch:
โ How many launches go live, and whether people keep creating them after day one
โ How active each token trades, since that's where the fees come from
โ Whether the burns are visible on chain, so I can check them myself
One honest limit. A burn is a mechanism, not a promise of price. If activity slows, the fee loop slows too, and I'd rather know that before I take a position than after.
I haven't seen the live numbers yet, so I'm not calling anything. I'm just going in knowing what to track.
Follow the fee, and the story gets easier to read.
@starlisting partners with @RebateLaunch so creators can post and earn.
$REBATE #RebateLaunchpad