The State of the Gaslighting is Strong!

Everywhere
Joined October 2008
TheBase-IsBack retweeted
Replying to @EmeraldRobinson
The core issue is the machines themselves - there are more that 14 software elements built in which allow data to be manipulated. Add the Chinese-made components with more potential capabilities and you begin to understand the scope of the issue. Remediation - applying a patch - is Kabuki theater to make people think the problem has been fixed when it has not. Mark Mullins finding confirms that elections conducted on these machines CAN NOT be certified. Listen to Ed Martin explain. @WhatmattersinG @Georgians4Truth @gc22gc @smalltownug @WeAreGwinnett @FultonGASpeaks @GA_Record @VoiceofRuralAm @GAballots @LisaLp23 @LMcClainCPA @lavenlarose @felterJC @Rustycanno3010 @patriot_savvy @gapatriotgirl @benefieldforga @realtimsharp @TheBaseIsBack @TheGoodFight @TheTybeeTimes @curiouscrimson1 @SmithsCoffeepot @CarolynRyanTV @DogeGeorgia @RealBookerScott @CDM_PRESS @JuanOSavin107 @TheQranker @RalphPezzullo @DutchForce17 @GammieloveMMO @JMCBroadcasting @RealLTCRicBosi @xrpqfs @DebraDosch @WowLewi @DrFrankModels @PatriotMarkCook
2
7
19
183
TheBase-IsBack retweeted
CLETA MITCHELL: Secretary Lutnick needs to do two things TODAY: 1. Oversee the installation of the Dominion software upgrades in Georgia. Every other jurisdiction installed them after Halderman identified nine vulnerabilities in 2022. Georgia's secretary of state has refused for four years. 2. Take the mitigation plan that DHS has already written and implement it. DHS can't mandate states to drop these systems. Commerce can. @CletaMitchell
3
17
2
13
807
TheBase-IsBack retweeted
Keisha truly doesn’t understand, or isn’t willing to admit she understands, what she put Atlanta through. I grew up in projects like the ones she abandoned, so it’s personal to me. But I also know a thing or two about leadership. Leaders don’t blame their staff, which Keisha did in another recent interview. Leaders don’t write off businesses hurt, properties damaged, and lives ruined or lost as “a police car, a Wendy’s, and a dumpster.” Real leaders don’t care about who gets the credit when things are going well - and they don’t pass the buck when things go poorly. Real leaders own their failures and learn from them. Keisha’s spent a career in politics, but she’s learned neither of those lessons. She has absolutely no business being Georgia’s governor.
53
152
10
730
13,256
TheBase-IsBack retweeted
THE AI DISINFORMATION TRAP There's another election-security story developing that may ultimately be even more consequential than the fight over who controls election administration. We're being warned that foreign actors will use AI, fake content and information warfare to flood Americans with false information, confuse voters and undermine confidence in our elections. That threat deserves to be taken seriously. But there's a potentially dangerous unintended consequence. What happens to Americans that have been raising legitimate questions about elections, like the analysis Unite4Freedom has completed in 35 states -and the first response is: “That's disinformation.” ? What happens when independent researchers publish election data, identify anomalies, challenge procedures or question official explanations—and instead of addressing the substance, people start asking: “Was this generated by AI?” That is where this gets very dangerous. Because organizations like Unite4Freedom are doing something fundamentally different from a foreign influence operation. We're analyzing information, examining election systems, identifying issues and presenting findings for public scrutiny. Those claims should be verified, challenged and debated on the evidence. They should not be dismissed as a "Russian Deep Fake" But we are rapidly building an information environment where the public is being told to expect an avalanche of AI-generated election disinformation. And that creates a frightening possibility: - Real information can become collateral damage in the fight against fake information. - A legitimate revelation can be dismissed because it sounds like something an AI system could have generated. - A legitimate analysis can be ignored because someone claims it is part of a disinformation campaign. - A documented anomaly can be buried beneath the question of whether the person reporting it is “real.” And eventually, the public stops asking: “Is this evidence true?” and starts asking: “Is this AI?” That's a dangerous place for a free society to go. Foreign disinformation should absolutely be exposed. AI-generated propaganda should absolutely be identified. But “disinformation” cannot become a magic word that makes inconvenient evidence disappear. The answer to questionable information isn't censorship. It's verification. Show the data. Examine the methodology. Reproduce the analysis. Challenge the conclusions. And if you think the evidence is wrong, prove it wrong. That's the standard Unite4Freedom should be held to. We welcome the debate. ...And it's the standard everyone else should be held to as well. visit Unite4freedom.com - see our work, become a volunteer, donate! #Unite4freedom #ElectionSecurity #Truth #AI
13
53
2
78
1,254
TheBase-IsBack retweeted
✨Throwback Thursday ✨ From “The Most Trusted Name in News”
8
79
79
2,168
TheBase-IsBack retweeted
Well, this should clear up a lot of the questions and the misinformation that has circulated about that one lone juror!
🚨HUGE BREAKING UPDATE - 🚨The holdout juror broke his silence by speaking with an INDEPENDENT JOURNALIST, Fugitive TV Podcast, this evening! 👏👏👏 HERE IS A FULL DETAILED WRITE-UP. The holdout juror is NOT an immigrant. According to marriage and divorce records, he married a Haitian immigrant. She was illegal. He did not know this when he married her. He did not show his face. He is keeping to himself since his name was doxxed on X. His life has been threatened, and people have stalked his house. NBC Boston did not give you the full story. Michael, the juror, is now divorced. He filed for divorce first. The marriage was fraudulent because she was not a citizen. When he did this, everything hit the fan. She didn’t want a divorce. His ex-wife filed a counterclaim a couple of months later. He was denied his divorce petition because she was not an American citizen. The incident with the nephew - according to the juror, there is a lot of information that many do not know. For example, the nephew is 6-foot-2, and Michael is only 5-foot-7. This obviously does not give anyone the right to hit anyone. But I think it is safe to say that we do not know all of the facts of the matter. Michael stated the truth will come out. None of this matters when it comes to what happened in the courtroom. He filled out his paperwork appropriately. He did not lie on his paperwork. He was asked if he had ever been arrested, and he checked the box “yes” and afterward had to describe what happened. He even took the stand, and the prosecutor asked him questions. He was questioned about his past arrest. He was then selected. I would like to make it very clear that this is something that happens with all of the potential jurors present. Which means that the jurors who have already been interviewed could have said this at any point, but they chose to keep that information from the public. Michael told Fugitive TV that from day one, eight of the jurors automatically wanted to go for not guilty. The eight jurors were “activists,” according to Michael. He said every day they voted, and the eight who were convinced that she was not guilty were doing their best to convince the other four that she was not guilty. At the very end, it was him and another juror. She was also voting guilty. At the last minute, she caved. He said he knew she was guilty based on the EVIDENCE. He was open about what he believed and what he said. He said the other jurors are telling half-truths or just outright lies. He’s never been convicted of a crime. His past should not matter. He said that the entire time, his ex-wife was just trying to get status and citizenship to live in the U.S. Michael said that the report on him that went viral, where they said they spoke with his family members, did not report exactly what was actually said. He said that the family members they spoke to were likely family members of his ex-wife, and he does not even speak with them. Therefore, they cannot know what actually happened in the jury room. Who DID NBC Boston speak with? According to Michael, it was not one of his own family members. Michael stated that he believes he’s being targeted because he is a Republican - a Black Republican with conservative values. He believes that he was on a juror panel with a large number of Democratic voters. And he knows exactly what’s happening right now, and I think that you all do as well. A Black Republican stood his ground. It is not surprising that he is now being dragged through the mud. This is a very bad precedent for people who will serve on a jury in the future for a national case. No one wants to do this when, based on their decision that they say is based on the evidence, they are crucified online for their political beliefs. You have all seen it. You have seen the threats that I get on a daily basis. I cannot imagine what this man is going through. But for now, I stand with the Black conservative Republican juror. Link in comments👇
5
100
1
85
6,160
TheBase-IsBack retweeted
🚨 ANNOUNCING PROJECT 18 & PROJECT 8 🚨 The 2026 midterms may be among the most consequential elections in recent history. Control of the House and Senate will determine the direction of the country for years to come. That’s why we’re launching: 🇺🇸 Project 18 – A weekly focus on the House races most likely to determine control of Congress. 🇺🇸 Project 8 – A weekly focus on the key Senate battlegrounds that could decide the future of the Senate. Each week we’ll release short videos, race updates, candidate information, and actionable content designed to inform voters and drive turnout in the districts and states that matter most. This is not about personalities. It’s about winning elections, protecting conservative priorities, and building a coalition that reaches voters where they are. As part of these projects, we will provide analysis of primary races across the country and what those results may mean for the upcoming midterm elections, helping voters understand the trends, opportunities, and challenges shaping the political landscape. If you’re willing to help, the ask is simple: 🔹 Repost 🔹 Quote Post 🔹 Share with your followers You can also support our efforts here: sway.co/misfits?utm_source=s… Together we can amplify these races, reach more voters, and help shape the outcome of the 2026 midterms. @rdejay @justjoshie1973 @ReaLIggylibre @hunter_eagleman @misfitpatriot @toxiccowboy02 @witebred @Americanalphax @liberty_bell #Project18 #Project8 #Midterms2026
10
37
8
89
7,453
TheBase-IsBack retweeted
Want to adopt someone from Colorado? Satirical comedy at its’ finest’ nicely done @wyborderpatrol I think the 🐝@TheBabylonBee might be a lil jelly of this. 😂
7
91
1
85
3,262
TheBase-IsBack retweeted
Raffensperger has known for over 5 years - half a decade - the voting system in Georgia is broken. From mail in ballots to in accurate voter rolls to machines that malfunction when counting to software that is vulnerable and needs updating and all he has ever done is say “but we don’t have enough time to fix anything” before the next election. The man is openly telling you he is a traitor to the Constitution. He should just move to China. msn.com/en-us/news/other/raf…
57
367
14
948
7,596
TheBase-IsBack retweeted
Join us for a discussion about NVRA in the context of the Constitution and Federal Law Set a reminder for my upcoming Space! xitter.cf/i/spaces/1mxPaZrjPNgKN

7
27
2
44
1,003
TheBase-IsBack retweeted
Join us for a discussion about NVRA in the context of the Constitution and Federal Law Set a reminder for my upcoming Space! xitter.cf/i/spaces/1mxPaZrjPNgKN

4
23
2
37
2,059
TheBase-IsBack retweeted
Replying to @Unite4Freedom
I think it's pretty cool that the STATES will have to submit to a FEDERAL agency a list that they attest to include ELIGIBLE VOTERS! So...that means no more getting away with, "Oops, that's just a a human data entry error" OR "That was just a computer glitch." Each STATE actually will have to sift through its (hideously corrupted) voter roll database, pull out the LEGITIMATE entries and put them on an OFFICIAL list for the USPS to process specialized mail to. My, oh, my...NO Wonder the States are BALKING! Hee, hee! Sounds like the JIG IS UP, to me‼️
2
5
12
115
TheBase-IsBack retweeted
Replying to @Unite4Freedom
Let’s be honest the USPS doesn’t want to participate in Mail Fraud. Mailing Ballots to unlawful registered voters would in my opinion be considered treason. The DOJ Civil Rights division has promised to hold any states accountable for mailing ballots to illegal voter registrants. The opposition wants fraudulent vote by mail to continue!
3
5
13
89
TheBase-IsBack retweeted
Good Dog
@GoodDog84Sep 8
Replying to @Unite4Freedom
And that raises the obvious question: If the state already knows exactly who it has authorized to receive a mail ballot, why would it object to identifying those outbound ballots to USPS and creating an additional layer of accountability over their entry into the mail stream? That is the question worth asking.
2
8
16
108
TheBase-IsBack retweeted
SCOTUS 26A305: WE MUST STOP DISTORTING WHAT THE USPS BALLOT-MAIL RULE ACTUALLY DOES. The Supreme Court is currently considering USPS v. California, No. 26A305, and responses to the government's emergency application are due September 9 at 4:00 PM EDT. Today, an amicus brief from current and former Members of Congress urged SCOTUS to keep the USPS rule blocked, arguing that USPS is intruding into the administration of elections. But read the rule. USPS DOES NOT: • decide who is registered to vote • determine who is a citizen • decide who qualifies for a mail ballot under state law • maintain the state's voter roll • audit the state's voter roll • decide whether a voter is legally eligible to vote Those decisions remain with the STATE. What the rule does is require the state, when it chooses to use the United States Postal Service to deliver federal mail ballots, to identify the people the state itself has determined should receive those ballots and associate those outbound ballot mail-pieces with standardized postal identifiers. That is a fundamentally different thing. The state says: these are the voters to whom we are sending ballots. USPS then says: if you are using our federal delivery system, the ballots entering our system must comply with defined mail-piece, barcode, identification, and submission standards. Congress has expressly given USPS authority under 39 U.S.C. §§401 and 404 to establish postal rules and to regulate the collection, handling, transportation, delivery, forwarding, returning, and holding of mail. That is why the real legal question is NOT whether USPS gets to run elections. It doesn't. It is not trying to. The real question is whether Congress's postal delegation allows USPS to impose these particular conditions on a specialized category of mail traveling through the federal postal system. And there is an election-security issue here that should not be buried beneath constitutional rhetoric: If a state knows which voters it has lawfully authorized to receive mail ballots, why shouldn't it be able to tell USPS exactly which outbound ballots are supposed to exist? Why shouldn't the federal delivery agent be able to verify that the ballots being entered into its system correspond to the state's own list? That adds another layer of accountability to an extraordinarily sensitive piece of election infrastructure. That is movement toward chain of custody. It is not complete chain of custody - the mandatory verification provisions at issue principally govern outbound ballots, so vulnerabilities can still remain after ballots leave voters and travel back for counting. But securing the outbound side is still a step forward. Standardized envelopes. Unique Intelligent Mail barcodes. Defined recipients supplied by the state. Postal verification before outbound ballots enter the mail-stream. Accountability for what was mailed, to whom, and under what identifier. The August rule was published as Ballot Mail for Federal Elections, 91 Fed. Reg. 54,966, specifically amending USPS mailing standards governing the transmission of federal mail and absentee ballots. So when an amicus brief characterizes this as USPS taking control of voter eligibility or election administration, look carefully at what is actually being regulated. The state still decides WHO MAY VOTE. The state still decides WHO MAY RECEIVE A MAIL BALLOT. The state still maintains THE VOTER ROLL. USPS is ONLY regulating HOW THAT BALLOT MAIL ENTERS AND MOVES THROUGH USPS. And right now, litigation is determining whether this additional layer of ballot-mail accountability will be allowed to take effect. 26A305. September 9 is the next major deadline. Unite4Freedom Will continue to watch this case closely. #Unite4Freedom #ElectionSecurity #USPS #SCOTUS #26A305
19
88
8
140
5,134