Pinned Tweet
All Essays & Articles from The WM Review
When carrying out the periodic update to the All Essays and Articles page, Substack informed us that it was now too long.
In order to address that, we have reformatted it. Here it is in an easy to use format:
wmreview.org/p/all-essays-an…
The WM Review retweeted
All Essays & Articles from The WM Review
When carrying out the periodic update to the All Essays and Articles page, Substack informed us that it was now too long.
In order to address that, we have reformatted it. Here it is in an easy to use format:
wmreview.org/p/all-essays-an…
At his talk at the "Catholic Identity Conference", @DrKwasniewski referred to "sedevacantism" as a "monstrous phenomenon".
Meanwhile, promotes all this.
Disappearing into self-parody, really.
"Time for Kwasniewski to come clean": A Lefebvrist blogger wants to know why Dr. Peter Kwasniewski keeps promoting Brian Scarffe's 'Soothsayer' blog - paxorbis.org/2026/11/11/time…
The WM Review retweeted
"Time for Kwasniewski to come clean": A Lefebvrist blogger wants to know why Dr. Peter Kwasniewski keeps promoting Brian Scarffe's 'Soothsayer' blog - paxorbis.org/2026/11/11/time…
The WM Review retweeted
I've finished the first volume.
This one's actually a pretty big deal and the history of the study of the liturgy and I'm happy to have gotten it out.
PDF available on my telegram
---
Liturgical Institutions, Volume I
By Dom Prosper Guéranger, Abbot of Solesmes
Dom Prosper Guéranger’s Liturgical Institutions is one of the major works behind the nineteenth-century restoration of the Roman liturgy in France. Written by the Abbot of Solesmes and author of The Liturgical Year, it combines historical scholarship, theological argument, and forceful controversy in defense of the Church’s public worship. This first volume traces the history of the liturgy from apostolic times through the first half of the seventeenth century.
Guéranger begins by explaining the nature of liturgy, its relationship to the virtue of religion, and its importance for understanding Catholic doctrine. His governing conviction is that the Church’s worship transmits her faith: its prayers, chants, ceremonies, and sacred books express the tradition she has received and teach it to successive generations. His treatment of liturgical prayer as the voice of the Church gives the historical narrative its theological foundation.
The volume follows the worship of the early Christians, the testimony of the Fathers, the work of Saint Gregory the Great, the spread of Roman worship through the West, and the development of the Mass, Divine Office, chant, and liturgical books. It also examines the Ambrosian, Gallican, Mozarabic, monastic, and Eastern liturgical traditions, the influence of Charlemagne, the contributions of medieval religious orders, and the composition of the Office of Corpus Christi.
Among its most striking sections is the famous chapter on “antiliturgical heresy,” in which Guéranger argues that attacks on Catholic doctrine repeatedly find expression in attacks on the Church’s inherited worship. Alongside this stands his detailed account of legitimate Catholic liturgical reform: the work of Trent and Saint Pius V, the revision of the Breviary and Missal, the publication of the Roman Ritual, and subsequent papal interventions. Together, these discussions make the volume particularly valuable for studying the relationship between tradition, development, ecclesiastical authority, and reform.
The book also contains extensive documentary material, including patristic testimony, papal enactments, historical correspondence, and bibliographical notices of liturgical writers. Readers encounter both Guéranger’s arguments and the sources upon which he builds them.
After I finish recalibrating a master prompt for the project, I'm going to go ahead and try to translate all four volumes of Dom Prosper Guéranger's "Institutions liturgiques". Unless the new prompt really increases the token efficiency of the project, I would expect this to take a week or two of supervision and compute.
If any of those who objected when I previously mentioned this idea would like to stop me, go ahead and produce a hand translation of this text, because I've got to say, it's been 148 years since the completion of this incredibly influential work, and there's still no complete English translation whatsoever. Once I see yours, I'll be happy to remove the machine translation from public circulation.
The WM Review retweeted
This isn’t 2020 anymore, no one ACTUALLY believes the “sedevacantists are the mean ones” anymore. Yeah you say that, then turn around and revile a brother of yours in Christ, call some random woman a cruel slur for dressing with a skirt slightly too high, and then think it’ll all be okay for you because you’re drooling with a doofus grin on your face while watching a crusader-larp TikTok edit of your boring liberal “pope”
Important work being done here.
It's a totally new world at this point. Never has it been easier to access these classic texts.
After I finish recalibrating a master prompt for the project, I'm going to go ahead and try to translate all four volumes of Dom Prosper Guéranger's "Institutions liturgiques". Unless the new prompt really increases the token efficiency of the project, I would expect this to take a week or two of supervision and compute.
If any of those who objected when I previously mentioned this idea would like to stop me, go ahead and produce a hand translation of this text, because I've got to say, it's been 148 years since the completion of this incredibly influential work, and there's still no complete English translation whatsoever. Once I see yours, I'll be happy to remove the machine translation from public circulation.
The WM Review retweeted
The Fathers on Jurisdiction and the Pope (Cardinal Juan de Torquemada)
In what way is the Pope the source of jurisdiction in the Church – and what did the Fathers teach?
wmreview.org/p/the-fathers-o…
The WM Review retweeted
Replying to @pizzaghostcats
This verse is the core of Sedevacantism actually: Christ’s Church is not corrupted precisely because those men who promote pernicious teachings and claim to represent her do not. His Church remains spotless, unsullied. She is as she always was.
The Fathers on Jurisdiction and the Pope (Cardinal Juan de Torquemada)
In what way is the Pope the source of jurisdiction in the Church – and what did the Fathers teach?
wmreview.org/p/the-fathers-o…
The WM Review retweeted
"It is impious to say, ‘I respect every religion.’ This is as much as to say: I respect the devil as much as God, vice as much as virtue, falsehood as much as truth, dishonesty as much as honesty,
Hell as much as Heaven.”
— Fr. Michael Müller, C.Ss.R (1825-1899)
My husband watched me pray in our Sikh faith at the RNC — and one of our last text messages before he died a couple of weeks later was telling me
he was so proud of me. He was supposed to be there, but he was also dying from two serious illnesses, and he could not make it at the last minute. Our medical staff at home took care of him while he watched me pray in our faith tradition -/ just as we did at home daily over each meal.
All you trash who have denigrated my prayer to the ONE GOD many faiths believe in, deeply hurt me for the last two years, but I could not comment back because I was part of a campaign and then confirmation -/ administration. It’s over. I won’t be silent any longer.
Go read the First Amendment and my extensive record on behalf of ALL people of faith in America. For 34 years. And then let’s measure our respective records on religious liberty. I welcome all comers who think they can prove they did more than I did for ALL people of faith in this country. There are none. I intend to keep fighting for ALL people of faith in America for the rest of my life. But I won’t hide my own faith for one second. It’s protected by our Constitution.
The WM Review retweeted
For what it’s worth, I don’t think it’s ironic at all: Those who know the Holy See is vacant are first and foremost concerned with clinging to the deposit of faith given to us by God. It’s only ironic insofar as the image projected onto sedevacantists is one of “despair”; but it’s just that: a projection — a projection rooted in the (very dangerous) sentiments of others.
The WM Review retweeted
Don’t get me wrong, our faith is not blind: the motives of credibility ascertainable via reason supply us with a moral certainty of Catholicism’s being true; but this judgment isn’t faith, but it’s what makes faith possible. Then when one assents by divine grace to Church dogma, he assents *because of God’s authority and veracity* with a supernatural and absolute faith, a certainty higher than any possible natural or metaphysical certainty, and will admit no possibility of being wrong. Such is the nature of a genuine faith.
But for many, it appears that they’re less concerned with having faith and more so with the modern obsession of being “intellectually honest,” “always open to new ideas.” But true “intellectual honesty” is ordering the intellect to its proper end (truth) and conforming to the truth according to its mode — and divine truth by its nature demands absolute and irrevocable conformity.
The WM Review retweeted
It’s ironic that “Sedevacantists” are, in a way, the most HOPEFUL Catholics: regardless of the situation, they maintain that God gives all sufficient grace (and especially to those who already have the gift of faith) and that nothing will convince them to abandon faith (for if one maintains that he could ever be convinced of Catholicism’s being false, he already lacks faith).
Some people seem to base their “faith” (in this case it’s not faith) on evidence rather than God’s authority: they’ll remain “Catholic” so long as the empirical evidence satisfies their natural judgment. “God just WOULDN’T allow X, Y, or Z! If he did, then I’d rather be Atheist!”
Ironically, these people probably believe that if they make it to the end of the world, they’d been the ones surviving the Great Apostasy! “I’ll be strong keep my faith in the worst era of the world, but not in what could be the *second* worst!”
The WM Review retweeted
The graphic below shows what is involved in "investigating" the validity of a single ordination for a "Novus Ordo priest" who joins a traditionalist group – on the basis (which we do not accept) that the new rites of episcopal consecration and priestly ordination are certainly valid.
We took the case study of Abp Hebda, who was the ordaining bishop of a priest reportedly joining the SSPX.
Not all the links in this chart need to be verified. But the idea that watching a video of just the priest's ordination is sufficient makes no sense, even on the supposition that the new rites are sufficient for validity.
The article below details what would actually be involved in such an investigation, and the minimum number of links that would need to be verified.
And yes, we are aware that this graphic is reminiscent both of the 'Pepe Sylvia' meme, and a bowl of spaghetti bolognese. But in a sense, that complexity is the point. Once you accept the last link in the chain needs to be investigated, there is no logic in not also investigating the other links back to a date such as 1968 at the latest.
The overwhelming burden of this task amply justifies a policy of universal conditional repetition of ordination/consecration (at least) for everyone who received their orders in the new rites. The Dominican moral theologians McHugh and Callan provide the principles that justify this.
wmreview.org/p/spaghetti-bol…
After a week of 16,000 words, time for something completely different:
Three French Graves – Abbé de Nantes, a ‘Martyr’ of WWII, and Mgr Guérard des Lauriers
The ‘MASDU’, National Socialist executions, burial practices, and becoming one with a tree:
wmreview.org/p/three-french-…
7
370
The WM Review retweeted
“St. Dominic had no share in those [violent] transactions, and made use of no other arms to repulse injuries than those of meekness and patience. He never complained of any affronts or evils which he received, courageosuly encountered every danger wherever the good of souls called him, being desirous to glorify God by shedding his blood in his cause if called to such a happiness, and he studied only to procure all the good in his power to those who hated and persecuted him.”
Butler’s Lives of the Saints
St. Dominic
The graphic below shows what is involved in "investigating" the validity of a single ordination for a "Novus Ordo priest" who joins a traditionalist group – on the basis (which we do not accept) that the new rites of episcopal consecration and priestly ordination are certainly valid.
We took the case study of Abp Hebda, who was the ordaining bishop of a priest reportedly joining the SSPX.
Not all the links in this chart need to be verified. But the idea that watching a video of just the priest's ordination is sufficient makes no sense, even on the supposition that the new rites are sufficient for validity.
The article below details what would actually be involved in such an investigation, and the minimum number of links that would need to be verified.
And yes, we are aware that this graphic is reminiscent both of the 'Pepe Sylvia' meme, and a bowl of spaghetti bolognese. But in a sense, that complexity is the point. Once you accept the last link in the chain needs to be investigated, there is no logic in not also investigating the other links back to a date such as 1968 at the latest.
The overwhelming burden of this task amply justifies a policy of universal conditional repetition of ordination/consecration (at least) for everyone who received their orders in the new rites. The Dominican moral theologians McHugh and Callan provide the principles that justify this.
wmreview.org/p/spaghetti-bol…

















