The WM Review (@TheWMReview) header
The WM Review (@TheWMReview) profile picture

Essays on the Catholic Church, theology, history and more. Posts do not necessarily represent the opinions of both editors.

England
Joined June 2021
Photo by The WM Review (@TheWMReview)Photo by The WM Review (@TheWMReview)Photo by The WM Review (@TheWMReview)Photo by The WM Review (@TheWMReview)Photo by The WM Review (@TheWMReview)Photo by The WM Review (@TheWMReview)Photo by The WM Review (@TheWMReview)Photo by The WM Review (@TheWMReview)Photo by The WM Review (@TheWMReview)Photo by The WM Review (@TheWMReview)
The WM Review retweeted
All Essays & Articles from The WM Review When carrying out the periodic update to the All Essays and Articles page, Substack informed us that it was now too long. In order to address that, we have reformatted it. Here it is in an easy to use format: wmreview.org/p/all-essays-an…
4
6
410
"Time for Kwasniewski to come clean": A Lefebvrist blogger wants to know why Dr. Peter Kwasniewski keeps promoting Brian Scarffe's 'Soothsayer' blog - paxorbis.org/2026/11/11/time…
1
5
2
19
2,577
The WM Review retweeted
I've finished the first volume. This one's actually a pretty big deal and the history of the study of the liturgy and I'm happy to have gotten it out. PDF available on my telegram --- Liturgical Institutions, Volume I By Dom Prosper Guéranger, Abbot of Solesmes Dom Prosper Guéranger’s Liturgical Institutions is one of the major works behind the nineteenth-century restoration of the Roman liturgy in France. Written by the Abbot of Solesmes and author of The Liturgical Year, it combines historical scholarship, theological argument, and forceful controversy in defense of the Church’s public worship. This first volume traces the history of the liturgy from apostolic times through the first half of the seventeenth century. Guéranger begins by explaining the nature of liturgy, its relationship to the virtue of religion, and its importance for understanding Catholic doctrine. His governing conviction is that the Church’s worship transmits her faith: its prayers, chants, ceremonies, and sacred books express the tradition she has received and teach it to successive generations. His treatment of liturgical prayer as the voice of the Church gives the historical narrative its theological foundation. The volume follows the worship of the early Christians, the testimony of the Fathers, the work of Saint Gregory the Great, the spread of Roman worship through the West, and the development of the Mass, Divine Office, chant, and liturgical books. It also examines the Ambrosian, Gallican, Mozarabic, monastic, and Eastern liturgical traditions, the influence of Charlemagne, the contributions of medieval religious orders, and the composition of the Office of Corpus Christi. Among its most striking sections is the famous chapter on “antiliturgical heresy,” in which Guéranger argues that attacks on Catholic doctrine repeatedly find expression in attacks on the Church’s inherited worship. Alongside this stands his detailed account of legitimate Catholic liturgical reform: the work of Trent and Saint Pius V, the revision of the Breviary and Missal, the publication of the Roman Ritual, and subsequent papal interventions. Together, these discussions make the volume particularly valuable for studying the relationship between tradition, development, ecclesiastical authority, and reform. The book also contains extensive documentary material, including patristic testimony, papal enactments, historical correspondence, and bibliographical notices of liturgical writers. Readers encounter both Guéranger’s arguments and the sources upon which he builds them.
After I finish recalibrating a master prompt for the project, I'm going to go ahead and try to translate all four volumes of Dom Prosper Guéranger's "Institutions liturgiques". Unless the new prompt really increases the token efficiency of the project, I would expect this to take a week or two of supervision and compute. If any of those who objected when I previously mentioned this idea would like to stop me, go ahead and produce a hand translation of this text, because I've got to say, it's been 148 years since the completion of this incredibly influential work, and there's still no complete English translation whatsoever. Once I see yours, I'll be happy to remove the machine translation from public circulation.
1
3
2
8
1,175
The WM Review retweeted
This isn’t 2020 anymore, no one ACTUALLY believes the “sedevacantists are the mean ones” anymore. Yeah you say that, then turn around and revile a brother of yours in Christ, call some random woman a cruel slur for dressing with a skirt slightly too high, and then think it’ll all be okay for you because you’re drooling with a doofus grin on your face while watching a crusader-larp TikTok edit of your boring liberal “pope”
5
4
2
38
1,420
The WM Review retweeted
The Fathers on Jurisdiction and the Pope (Cardinal Juan de Torquemada) In what way is the Pope the source of jurisdiction in the Church – and what did the Fathers teach? wmreview.org/p/the-fathers-o…
1
4
16
770
The WM Review retweeted
Replying to @pizzaghostcats
This verse is the core of Sedevacantism actually: Christ’s Church is not corrupted precisely because those men who promote pernicious teachings and claim to represent her do not. His Church remains spotless, unsullied. She is as she always was.
2
3
1
30
568
The WM Review retweeted
"It is impious to say, ‘I respect every religion.’ This is as much as to say: I respect the devil as much as God, vice as much as virtue, falsehood as much as truth, dishonesty as much as honesty, Hell as much as Heaven.” — Fr. Michael Müller, C.Ss.R (1825-1899)
My husband watched me pray in our Sikh faith at the RNC — and one of our last text messages before he died a couple of weeks later was telling me he was so proud of me. He was supposed to be there, but he was also dying from two serious illnesses, and he could not make it at the last minute. Our medical staff at home took care of him while he watched me pray in our faith tradition -/ just as we did at home daily over each meal. All you trash who have denigrated my prayer to the ONE GOD many faiths believe in, deeply hurt me for the last two years, but I could not comment back because I was part of a campaign and then confirmation -/ administration. It’s over. I won’t be silent any longer. Go read the First Amendment and my extensive record on behalf of ALL people of faith in America. For 34 years. And then let’s measure our respective records on religious liberty. I welcome all comers who think they can prove they did more than I did for ALL people of faith in this country. There are none. I intend to keep fighting for ALL people of faith in America for the rest of my life. But I won’t hide my own faith for one second. It’s protected by our Constitution.
1
28
1
136
1,876
The WM Review retweeted
For what it’s worth, I don’t think it’s ironic at all: Those who know the Holy See is vacant are first and foremost concerned with clinging to the deposit of faith given to us by God. It’s only ironic insofar as the image projected onto sedevacantists is one of “despair”; but it’s just that: a projection — a projection rooted in the (very dangerous) sentiments of others.
1
3
22
771
The WM Review retweeted
Don’t get me wrong, our faith is not blind: the motives of credibility ascertainable via reason supply us with a moral certainty of Catholicism’s being true; but this judgment isn’t faith, but it’s what makes faith possible. Then when one assents by divine grace to Church dogma, he assents *because of God’s authority and veracity* with a supernatural and absolute faith, a certainty higher than any possible natural or metaphysical certainty, and will admit no possibility of being wrong. Such is the nature of a genuine faith. But for many, it appears that they’re less concerned with having faith and more so with the modern obsession of being “intellectually honest,” “always open to new ideas.” But true “intellectual honesty” is ordering the intellect to its proper end (truth) and conforming to the truth according to its mode — and divine truth by its nature demands absolute and irrevocable conformity.
3
3
28
942
The WM Review retweeted
It’s ironic that “Sedevacantists” are, in a way, the most HOPEFUL Catholics: regardless of the situation, they maintain that God gives all sufficient grace (and especially to those who already have the gift of faith) and that nothing will convince them to abandon faith (for if one maintains that he could ever be convinced of Catholicism’s being false, he already lacks faith). Some people seem to base their “faith” (in this case it’s not faith) on evidence rather than God’s authority: they’ll remain “Catholic” so long as the empirical evidence satisfies their natural judgment. “God just WOULDN’T allow X, Y, or Z! If he did, then I’d rather be Atheist!” Ironically, these people probably believe that if they make it to the end of the world, they’d been the ones surviving the Great Apostasy! “I’ll be strong keep my faith in the worst era of the world, but not in what could be the *second* worst!”
17
8
6
114
6,218
The WM Review retweeted
The graphic below shows what is involved in "investigating" the validity of a single ordination for a "Novus Ordo priest" who joins a traditionalist group – on the basis (which we do not accept) that the new rites of episcopal consecration and priestly ordination are certainly valid. We took the case study of Abp Hebda, who was the ordaining bishop of a priest reportedly joining the SSPX. Not all the links in this chart need to be verified. But the idea that watching a video of just the priest's ordination is sufficient makes no sense, even on the supposition that the new rites are sufficient for validity. The article below details what would actually be involved in such an investigation, and the minimum number of links that would need to be verified. And yes, we are aware that this graphic is reminiscent both of the 'Pepe Sylvia' meme, and a bowl of spaghetti bolognese. But in a sense, that complexity is the point. Once you accept the last link in the chain needs to be investigated, there is no logic in not also investigating the other links back to a date such as 1968 at the latest. The overwhelming burden of this task amply justifies a policy of universal conditional repetition of ordination/consecration (at least) for everyone who received their orders in the new rites. The Dominican moral theologians McHugh and Callan provide the principles that justify this. wmreview.org/p/spaghetti-bol…
5
5
1
24
1,431
The WM Review retweeted
“St. Dominic had no share in those [violent] transactions, and made use of no other arms to repulse injuries than those of meekness and patience. He never complained of any affronts or evils which he received, courageosuly encountered every danger wherever the good of souls called him, being desirous to glorify God by shedding his blood in his cause if called to such a happiness, and he studied only to procure all the good in his power to those who hated and persecuted him.” Butler’s Lives of the Saints St. Dominic
3
11
276
The WM Review retweeted
Spaghetti Bolognese: A Novus Ordo ordination can’t be proved valid with a single video Even if the new rites were certainly valid, verifying the orders of a ‘Novus Ordo priest’ would be a more tangled task than some seem to think: wmreview.org/p/spaghetti-bol…
2
1
8
681
The WM Review retweeted
Later today on The WM Review: Spaghetti Bolognese: A Novus Ordo ordination can’t be proved valid with a single video
2
2
1
12
1,399
The WM Review retweeted
There have been some interesting reactions to the "announcement" regarding the Thesis of Cassiciacum yesterday. While the feedback has been positive, it's worth noticing that some of the criticism was already address in the article itself: wmreview.org/p/thoughts-on-t…
4
3
24
1,162
The WM Review retweeted
I cannot wait to sit down and read this tonight! My good friend @TheWMReview has officially and substantially adopted the theses of Msgr. Guérard des Lauriers, O.P., on the present crisis in the Catholic Church, i.e. we are experiencing (enduring, more specifically) a formal vacancy of pontifical authority since 1965 at the latest. God bless Sean and his truly incredible work. I highly recommend his Catholic essays and analysis for the intellectually curious.
Thoughts on the Thesis of Cassiciacum – From the grave of Mgr Guérard des Lauriers On the occasion of visiting the late Dominican bishop’s final resting place, the author has something of an ‘announcement’ to make: wmreview.org/p/thoughts-on-t…
3
4
52
1,840
The WM Review retweeted
One can only think here of what the Delphic oracle said to Croesus of Lydia in the Histories: if you march against the Persians, you will destroy a great empire. I hope someone remembers how this prophecy was fulfilled.
BREAKING: Trump says a 'whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will'.
15
781
71
4,455
544,883
The WM Review retweeted
Thoughts on the Thesis of Cassiciacum – From the grave of Mgr Guérard des Lauriers On the occasion of visiting the late Dominican bishop’s final resting place, the author has something of an ‘announcement’ to make: wmreview.org/p/thoughts-on-t…
7
14
3
54
4,599
The WM Review retweeted
Wow! For Thomas Mirus to raise the issue of automatic loss of office on account of heresy is really encouraging. Notice that Salza and Siscoe already inserted themselves into the discussion, so as to prevent Mirus from concluding the obvious: that a man like Grünwidl may be a lot of things, but Catholic bishop isn't one of them.
Heretics can't hold ecclesiastical office. Now I know that not all denial of infallible teaching is technically heresy, just grave doctrinal error, but I wonder if they both have the same effect on one's office - I don't see why they wouldn't. So is the see of Vienna vacant right now?
4
36
1,942
The WM Review retweeted
We wouldn't have thought a 12,000 word monster-piece on Assisi would have been as popular as this has been. But it does contain: - Everything you need to know about John Paul II's pan-religious Assisi event in 1986 - Scrupulously fair evaluation of the defences offered by John Paul II - Exposé of the real heart of the problem - An account of the completely cringeworthy legacy of the Assisi event. So check it out: wmreview.org/p/the-apostasy-…
1
3
2
26
1,243