@TheoryFail

Evolution is ONLY a theory. And so is the Big Bang. And Climate Change. Just like gravity. And germ theory.

 UK
Joined January 2014
  • Tweets98.2K
  • Following311
  • Followers3.7K
422Media
Replying to @RoblovesYeshua
Evolution defies several universal laws. The law of entropy (Big Bang?) and the law of information systems (genetics) for starters. Laws demand a law Giver.
24
2
3
5
Theory Fail retweeted
بو صلاح@asrj9226 Oct 2020
Replying to @Hipstone88 @EmmanuelMacron
I know the evolution theory by every detail and thousands of proffessors alrdy anmounced that it cant be proven everything is going against it, but ppl with low knowledge like u are easily decieved by whats given to u to keep atheism going on
7
3
1
6
Theory Fail retweeted
بو صلاح@asrj9226 Oct 2020
Replying to @Hipstone88 @EmmanuelMacron
If u have a religion then u wont have a problem with miracles, but if ur an atheist then u believe u were an ape so dont make urself intelligent at all. Thats first of all
2
1
10
Replying to @am_i_olajide @funshographix
I do not believe in the evolution theory. There are Africans who migrated to N. Equator whose descendants still exist today. Their melanin is still there as is their afro hair. The white man came from the Dravidian albino not from the African albino due to genetic splicing
2
1
1
Replying to @ErichKays @omeagoz @DuaneSnow12 @Dcoronata
The New Testament is only about 2000 years old and you will not believe that when you and others seem to believe in an evolution theory of something that nobody was around to even witness or alive to write about. Amazing!
3
2
Replying to @Maestermagoo @caitoz
But what I see is scientists continuing to fit a round peg into a square hole to make the natural evolution theory fit... But it doesn't stand up to scrutiny. xitter.cf/ydeigin/status/1260594…
Yuri Deigin
@ydeigin13 May 2020
So I looked at the RmYN02 sequence, which is claimed to have natural insertions at the S1/S2 cleavage site reminiscent of CoV2's PRRA insert. Doesn't look close to me - if RmYN02 is compared to its nearest ancestor ZC45, no real insertion is evident, just mutations (see pic).
1
1
And now look, the earthly treasures, human wisdom and evolution theory has failed to give them solution to the deadly corona virus. Time to run to God, the only solution. #SundayWordExpendition – at Helsinki, Finland
Timo Aleko@AlekoAtundo24 May 2020
Replying to @Magdalene__7
The generation lost The Fear of The LORD and was so engulfed in storing up treasures in this world. We need to repent #SundayWordExpedition
2
1
Theory Fail retweeted
derryck.eth
@Derricc_30 Nov 2019
Replying to @AmmonKashmir @DerKlownstein @kaylasheagg
My conclusion on the Theory of evolution is that it’s only a theory. Because you can prove any topic to a certain point. Your major support in this argument is that the human and monkey 🧬 are similar to a certain point has been disproved. Any other point are just assumptions
1
2
1
Now we can debate the word "observe". I did not observe evolution from the beginning of time and neither did any other living human. We possibly can now observe and prove there are defects in genetics, and that is a fact, but that is not the same thing as evolution theory.
Scandinavian Atheist🇸🇪🇺🇦@054durin2 Nov 2019
Replying to @kings_gaylem @GayleKings
You use the word "fact" instead of evidence & observations. Evolution is something we observe, so based on your own logic it must be a fact. The ToE is something different, it's an explanation on how & why species evolve.
2
1
1
You cannot observe what already happend thousands and millions of years ago, and evolution happens over a long period of time an much longer than one human lifespan, so Evolution Theory is STILL a theory which cannot be proved.
Greg Camp 💉x7🌹🧦🇺🇦@GregCampNC3 Nov 2019
Replying to @kings_gaylem @GayleKings
Yes, we observe evolution happening right now, and we learn more and more about how DNA developed every year. The theory of evolution by natural selection is the explanation of observed evidence.
3
1
Replying to @Omzin8a @mrsunesis
The Big Bang theory for instance is a strong belief held by so many however it’s non factual as there is yet a scientific evidence to dispute arguments around it even the evolution theory is up for arguments 🤷‍♂️
2
1
2
Again - some facts support evolution theory, but the entire theory itself cannot be proved, so the theory itself is not a fact. Like the big bang theory, some known facts might support it, but the entire theory is not proved.
Scandinavian Atheist🇸🇪🇺🇦@054durin1 Nov 2019
Replying to @kings_gaylem @GayleKings
I didn't ask you about the ToE, I asked you about evolution. Is evolution a fact according to you?
2
1
2
1
Theory of Evolution is not fact, so it's an explanation of a theory and is not fact, and again the question "why" is not answered in science. Just for example, why DNA exists at all is not explained by science. Humans do not observe evolution over time, if it even exists.
Scandinavian Atheist🇸🇪🇺🇦@054durin2 Nov 2019
Replying to @kings_gaylem @GayleKings
You use the word "fact" instead of evidence & observations. Evolution is something we observe, so based on your own logic it must be a fact. The ToE is something different, it's an explanation on how & why species evolve.
4
2
2
Theory Fail retweeted
Empyrean@FinalPreacher29 Jan 2019
Replying to @KrispKiwi
No, nothing is required for a theory. Theory is butt-smoke; pure hypothesis. Thesis. Theory. Same root word. As in not a fact pertaining to a law. As in: NEEDS MATH. Math proves all laws, but can't prove evolution - cuz it's butt-smoke. Get it?
1
2
3
1
Theory Fail retweeted
cryptoguru@crypt_oguru14 Jan 2019
"creation translation" translation: I can't understand the difference between the theory of evolution as a speculative explanation of the origin of all life from one cell, and science that we observe, measure and test in the present ... so I'll make a straw man and fight that
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
4
1
2
1
Theory Fail retweeted
cryptoguru@crypt_oguru14 Jan 2019
Replying to @malo_j @lyonsnyc @jools6691 @NuckChorris16 @spikeinthemidge @wiguy45 @BjarteBjorkum @AndrewC95857546 @sabina_ @carlsmythe @DoubleDoubleJon @ei9iw @JulieAMcLean @Charles42548867 @ReillyOToole1 @Racer_X_9 @greensboro_ @Catheri77148739 @mindg4me12 @DCraelin @Schmoop0521 @DoesnAbout @DariusConquis @Mwforhr @halcyondon @PET_Skep @foofly @wildpinkrabbit @stevep44 @NancyBurridge @sethfadez @knkcattle @RealCandaceO @DeepStateExpose @JeffFlake @newsobserver @TheoryFail @_CROPES_
nope, that's a definition of "change". Speciation is ASSUMED to come from change, because you ASSUME that change in the genome is unbounded. You also ASSUME that random genetic change in succession can build new beneficial phenotypic features.
1
1
Theory Fail retweeted
cryptoguru@crypt_oguru14 Jan 2019
Replying to @lyonsnyc @jools6691 @NuckChorris16 @spikeinthemidge @malo_j @wiguy45 @BjarteBjorkum @AndrewC95857546 @sabina_ @carlsmythe @DoubleDoubleJon @ei9iw @JulieAMcLean @Charles42548867 @ReillyOToole1 @Racer_X_9 @greensboro_ @Catheri77148739 @mindg4me12 @DCraelin @Schmoop0521 @DoesnAbout @DariusConquis @Mwforhr @halcyondon @PET_Skep @foofly @wildpinkrabbit @stevep44 @NancyBurridge @sethfadez @knkcattle @RealCandaceO @DeepStateExpose @JeffFlake @newsobserver @TheoryFail @_CROPES_
change in allele frequency over time is NOT a definition for evolution. That's just genetics. If that is your definition of evolution, then it covers Intelligent Design too. We all agree that genes change, we disagree about what that change is capable of and its origin.
2
2
1
2
Replying to @RaheemKassam
There is no scientific proof for Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, it is just that, a theory, but we have it rammed down our throats as if it is a scientific fact. James Watson has unfortunately fallen fowl of the thought police who are proceeding to make him persona non grata.
2
1
2
3
Replying to @jaidibear81 @rdfrs @RichardDawkins @rdfrsTIES
Theory is a merely a supposition intended to explain something. Those who have looked for the scientific evidence of evolution and found insufficient proof are not disagreeing with the theory because of religious beliefs but because of the current lack of fossilized evidence.
5
1
Replying to @rdfrs @RichardDawkins @rdfrsTIES
It’s just a scientific theory for Pete’s sake—you’d think it’s a damn religion based on it being proselytized like this.
5
1
Load more