AHF | Delusion Denier | yes to SSS no to Misogyny & Misandry. โ๏ธโ๏ธKPSS. Retweets are not always endorsements! TERF 5577!
FUBAR
Joined November 2021
- Tweets182K
- Following2.5K
- Followers2.5K
- Likes665K
Pinned Tweet
This is dystopian, why would anyone want to go to Australia @ausgov or take their daughters there?
For opposing the inclusion of men who claim transgender status in women's sports, and for calling men, men, @KirralieS has been ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ $๐ต๐ฑ,๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐๐ผ ๐๐๐ผ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป๐-๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป'๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฟ - in addition to their court fees.
One of the men, Justin "Riley" Dennis, has ๐ถ๐ป๐ท๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐๐ต๐น๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ฑ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ฒ๐.
Despite this, the team he plays on, ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ถ๐ป๐ฐ๐น๐๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ผ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป๐-๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฎ๐น๐ฒ๐, was presented with a Fair Play Award.
But in addition to the egregious payout, Kirralie has also been ordered, by the Supreme Court of New South Wales, ๐๐ผ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐น๐น ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฎ, ๐ฎ๐ ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ป๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐, ๐ฎ ๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐ป ๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐บ๐ถ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ด๐๐ถ๐น๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐น๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ณ ๐ฎ ๐ฏ๐ถ๐ด๐ผ๐.
The court ordered the text must remain prominently visible for three months. An attorney for one of the men, Nicholas "Stephanie" Blanch, had demanded the posts remain visible for up to TWO YEARS across all of her social media.
The text of the court-ordered announcement, known as Annexure A, and intended to teach a lesson to anyone who reads her content, is as follows:
---------------
"ANNEXURE A
PUBLISHED BY ORDER OF THE LOCAL COURT OF NSW AS VARIED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF NSW
Following proceedings in the Local Court of NSW (2024/78280) the Local Court of NSW has declared that Kirralie Smith and Binary Australia contravened section 38S of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1997 (NSW) by making and publishing various social media posts between 19 January 2023 and 27 March 2023 and a newsletter dated 19 January 2023 that incited hatred towards, serious contempt for, or severe ridicule of a soccer player on the ground that she is a transgender person.
Public acts that incite hatred towards, serious contempt for, or severe ridicule of, a person or group of persons on the ground that the person or group are transgender are unlawful under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW).
The Local Court of NSW has ordered Kirralie Smith and Binary Australia to pay damages to the soccer player, and to remove the offending posts and to not repeat or continue the offending behaviour."
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
Last month @PreetKGillMP told The Telegraph that she had โserious concernsโ.
โAs the Cass Review advised, parents and guardians must have freedom to take a cautious approach when navigating sensitive topics with their children. The evidence shows that devices such as chest-binders or puberty blockers can cause long-term bodily damageโ.
โBut by criminalising words that amount to โeconomicโ and โemotional pressureโ, the bill could undermine this advice from Cass, and ensnare parents who simply want to properly examine the risks involved with early โtransitionโ, and where appropriate, advise against rushing into the use of such serious interventions.โ.
โIt would be wrong if a bill created to protect vulnerable people would overreach into potentially causing unnecessary censorship of important and loving conversations within families.โ
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
@RosieDuffield1 said: โThis bill sounds as though it seeks to outlaw the vile practice of conversion therapy, something thatโs already illegal.
โHowever, a confused child who may want to explore their thoughts on gender, needs adult support, guidance and advice before reaching any lifelong decisions at an age recognisably well-below adult cognitive maturity.โ
โThis is normal, and as children are not adults, serious parental or professional advice must never be made illegal.โ
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
One Labour MP โItโs crackers and is quickly turning into a complete fiasco.โ
Another back-bench Labour MP said: โWe know thereโs a long history of gay men and lesbians being bullied and worse just because of the way that they are...
But โbundling in gender identityโ was not the solution.
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
@gstringermp said he would vote against the bill
โItโs a completely inappropriate thing for the state to be doing.โ
โI will listen to the debate. From what I know now, I will vote against it. It seems like a huge intrusion into family life. It seems to be an attack on parents.โ
โThe consequences of breaching the proposals in the bill are ridiculously punitiveโ
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
@GlindonMary โThe expert evidence has been clear: the drafting of this bill could result in parents, faith leaders, teachers and counsellors being unfairly restricted or even punished for raising concerns or questions about a young personโs decision to โtransitionโ.โ
โThis would undermine important findings from the Cass Report, which recommends taking a โcautious approachโ in light of various unknown consequences and potential harms of interventions like puberty blockers or chest bindersโ.
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
@steveyemm said: โI support banning abusive and coercive conversion practices, but we must ensure that parents, teachers and clinicians can have open and honest conversations with young people questioning their gender, without fear of criminalisation.โ
โBiological sex matters, and legitimate gender-critical beliefs must remain protected. I welcome the parliamentary scrutiny of the draft bill and hope it will address these concerns.โ
โI remain sceptical but I have an open mind and would be willing to support legislation that protects people from genuine abuse while safeguarding freedom of belief and appropriate clinical care.โ
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
Baroness @HayteratLords said โWhilst no-one supports any mental or physical abuse on a child or young person exploring their sexuality, a bill which could criminalise parents, siblings, therapists or churches for normal discussions and guidance would be dangerous and undesirable.
โThere may never be an actual prosecution, but the threat of that or even reporting to the police would have a chilling effect on the most ordinary or loving conversations.โ
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
Lord Glasman said โPutting parents at risk of prosecution for trying to protect their children is something no Labour government should even consider.โ
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
@ToniaAntoniazzi said the draconian legislation would have a chilling effect on parents who wanted to give children loving advice.
โI would urge the Prime Minister to step in and scrap this bill.โ
โIf parents are criminalised and families divided, it is mothers who will be affected.โ
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
๐ฉฒ๐ฅ๐ฉฒ๐ฅ๐ฉฒ๐ฅ๐ฉฒ๐ฅ๐ฉฒ๐ฅ
@ToniaAntoniazzi said the draconian legislation would have a chilling effect on parents who wanted to give children loving advice.
โI would urge the Prime Minister to step in and scrap this bill.โ
โIf parents are criminalised and families divided, it is mothers who will be affected.โ
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
Just how does saying to a boy he's not a girl when it's actually reality, harm them?
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
Many of us donโt believe gender identity is real any more than we believe angels are real.
Any law that says you not only have to believe gender identity is real but that you can be persecuted if you upset someone who does think it is real is positively mediaeval.
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
lol you said it was 4 elements yesterday you moron
So @PeterTatchell do you also condemn misrepresenting the #ConversionBill? Because yesterday you had 4 criteria, one of which was complete fantasy. You now seem to have only 3. What happened?
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
So @PeterTatchell do you also condemn misrepresenting the #ConversionBill? Because yesterday you had 4 criteria, one of which was complete fantasy. You now seem to have only 3. What happened?
I condemn scaremongering about the Conversion Practices Bill
It won't stop parents discussing with their children. NO offence is committed unless 1. They INTEND to change their child's sexuality or gender identity 2. The conduct is ABUSIVE and 3. It HARMS them.
It has to be all THREE; otherwise it is NOT an offence & parents cannot be prosecuted
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
The Church of England has warned that the Conversion Practices Bill could criminalise prayer.
The bill is not only an attack on free speech but also an assault on religious freedom.
The Church says the legislation must not โunintentionally criminaliseโ prayer or pastoral support, and must allow space for discussion and disagreement.
Leaders of the Roman Catholic Church have also voiced grave concerns about this sinister bill.
A Church of England spokesperson said: โOf course, pastoral care and prayer should never be coercive.
โA ban on conversion therapy must still allow space for discussion and disagreement. We want to prevent abuses of power and coercive practices, which should be the focus of any legislation.โ
The Churchโs legislative body, the General Synod, passed a motion calling for a ban on conversion practices before the proposed law was expanded to include attempts to change someoneโs gender identity.
Read more below in @Telegraph ๐
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
Cruel and archaic conversion practices that try to force someone who is gay to be straight are, of course, abhorrent. That is why they are already illegal.
But, as is becoming increasingly common, the Labour government is obsessing over legislating for issues that are not actually a problem, and its Conversion Practices Bill is a prime example.
Under the draft Conversion Practices Bill, parents, therapists, and religious leaders could face up to five years behind bars for well-intentioned conversations with gender-confused children, or for sharing their faith's teachings on sex, gender, and marriage with their congregations.
Government figures show that Labour's Conversion Practices Bill could cost businesses and taxpayers up to ยฃ100 million over a decade. Businesses and taxpayers are already facing enough pressure in the current economic climate.
We cannot afford this bill.
Read more below ๐
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
Labour MPs are calling on Andy Burnham to scrap the draft Conversion Practices Bill, which could see parents jailed for up to five years for having well-intentioned conversations with their gender-confused children.
At least a dozen MPs have reportedly told Labour whips that they are unhappy with the bill. A number of ministers are also said to have โgrave concernsโ.
Under the bill, parents, therapists and religious leaders could face up to five years in prison for putting pressure on someone to change their sexuality or gender identity.
The bill risks being weaponised by activists, children and employers. It is also expected to cost ยฃ100 million over a decade.
Lord Glasman, founder of Blue Labour, has said: โPutting parents at risk of prosecution for trying to protect their children is something no Labour government should even consider.โ
Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi believes the draconian legislation would have a chilling effect on parents who want to give their children loving advice.
She told The Telegraph: โI would urge the Prime Minister to step in and scrap this bill.
โMothers are often closest to their children โ they need to be brave and strong and look after their children. If parents are criminalised and families divided, it is mothers who will be affected.โ
This bill is perverse and sinister. It must be axed.
Read more in @Telegraph ๐
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
"Parents refusing to buy their daughter a breast binder. A therapist asking why a teenage boy is so certain he is a girl that heโs started buying untested hormones over the dark web. A wife expressing astonishment that her husband of 20 years claims to be a woman. These would all be criminalised by the bill..." @HadleyFreeman in @thetimes on @UKLabour's woeful #ConversionPracticesDraftBill.
thetimes.com/article/20cad62โฆ
Union Mac๐๐ค๐๐ฒ retweeted
I live in a country where police returned an underage girl to a gang who were raping her, dozens of police officers have links to these gangs and the researchers who wrote a report on it have to remain anonymous for fear of reprisals.
The UK. 2026.
Police officers returned grooming gang victim to abusers and said 'enjoy your night lads'
examinerlive.co.uk/news/locaโฆ
