In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is an act of revolution Transhuman rights aren't human rights
Planet Earth
Joined February 2018
- Tweets11.1K
- Following773
- Followers339
- Likes22.2K
Pinned Tweet
Transhumanism: the ultimate wet dream of megalomaniacal technocratic oligarchies, or the future of humanity and life itself in the Age of Biotech? open.substack.com/pub/violet…
If we don't join the dots, we don't get to see the whole picture
Deanna retweeted
Violent men react violently to women marching peacefully to protest male violence.
Well done to the brave women who set up @NottsRtN and to all the sheroes who joined them.
👏 💚 🤍 💜 💪
Deanna retweeted
THE CONVERSION PRACTICES BILL: WHEN THE STATE COMES KNOCKING AT YOUR FRONT DOOR
Here's what Labour isn't telling you about its proposed Conversion Practices Bill.
A parent doesn't have to be convicted of a crime for the process itself to become the punishment.
Imagine questioning your child when they claim a gender identity, asking hard questions about the direction they are taking, or seeking advice because you're genuinely concerned about their wellbeing.
Now imagine your child, or somebody, reports you for attempting to change that child's mind.
Suddenly, you could find yourself facing police enquiries, safeguarding referrals, social services assessments and potentially family court proceedings.
Your family life turned upside down. Your relationship with your child damaged. All before anybody has established that you've committed a crime.
And here's where it gets particularly Orwellian.
During parliamentary evidence on 2 November, campaigner Jayne Ozanne argued that even prayer directed at changing somebody's identity should fall within the criminal boundary, although she acknowledged the present draft does not go that far, it can still be investigated.
The Government assures us that ordinary parenting won't be criminalised.
But that's not the whole question, is it?
Who investigates the allegations? Who decides whether a parent's concern amounts to emotional pressure? And who puts a family back together when an investigation concludes that no crime was committed?
Nobody is defending abusive conversion practices. But protecting children from abuse must never become an excuse for making ordinary parents afraid to question, challenge or guide their own children.
When parents begin to fear the authorities more than they trust their own judgement, something has gone terribly wrong.
Parents must be free to ask difficult questions, particularly when children are considering decisions with potentially lifelong consequences.
We should be able to protect people from abuse without making parents afraid to parent.
Read the argument, and more importantly, read what the proposed law actually says.
👇
thetimes.com/article/20cad62…
#conversionpracticesdraftbill
Deanna retweeted
The influence of Charlotte Proudman and Jolyon Maugham is plain to see. No one should be funding this
The core facts in one of the cases referred to by GLP (Nervo) are set out in this appeal court judgment on a disputed costs order, in which both parties are named - judiciary.uk/wp-content/uplo…
That Maugham is anywhere near this case is a matter of genuine concern.
Deanna retweeted
So @PeterTatchell do you also condemn misrepresenting the #ConversionBill? Because yesterday you had 4 criteria, one of which was complete fantasy. You now seem to have only 3. What happened?
I condemn scaremongering about the Conversion Practices Bill
It won't stop parents discussing with their children. NO offence is committed unless 1. They INTEND to change their child's sexuality or gender identity 2. The conduct is ABUSIVE and 3. It HARMS them.
It has to be all THREE; otherwise it is NOT an offence & parents cannot be prosecuted
Deanna retweeted
Stonewall charged £1500 to British Library for a training session on how to tackle those with gender critical views. Unlawful and hugely influential to
the Green Party play book who still carry on paying subscriptions to Stonewall conservativesforwomen.org/ho…
Deanna retweeted
Has @UKHouseofLords limited replies to stop people pointing out that this bloke harassed Rosie Duffield when she was in @UKLabour?
A joint committee made up of members of the House of Lords and House of Commons has been set up to consider the government’s Draft Conversion Practices Bill.
The committee seeks views on how the draft bill could be improved. Get involved by 16 November ⬇️ committees.parliament.uk/com…
Deanna retweeted
“ But this social worker’s point applies anywhere adults work with children. Some people will seek out those roles for the wrong reasons. And the person whose behaviour you need to question might be the nicest person you know.
She also makes an important point about why safeguarding starts with having a clear sense of what’s normal and what isn’t. Once that boundary starts to blur, it’s easier for someone to cross it without being challenged.”
This used to form the basis of much #safeguarding/child protection training.
Sadly a lot of training in some areas has now itself been infiltrated.
Whereas it’s a message that needs to be constantly reiterated as people find it so hard to apply in real life situations.
#RestoreSafeguarding
Imagine being in your first week of social work training and being told that some of your fellow students might be there to gain access to vulnerable children.
Shocking, right? But this social worker’s point applies anywhere adults work with children. Some people will seek out those roles for the wrong reasons. And the person whose behaviour you need to question might be the nicest person you know.
She also makes an important point about why safeguarding starts with having a clear sense of what’s normal and what isn’t. Once that boundary starts to blur, it’s easier for someone to cross it without being challenged.
I wish I’d seen this video years ago. I can think of times when something felt off and I kept quiet because I worried I might be wrong or cause offence.
Thanks @JournalistJill for highlighting it.
Deanna retweeted
#ReclaimTheNightNottingham
Police had to escort us through the city. The streets of Nottingham are not safe for women in 2026
The words "female-only" are met with violence, intimidation and harassment
But we stayed strong and finished our march
Power to the women ♀️💜💚🤍
Deanna retweeted
🇪🇺 I spent ten years with the Greens and three decades in progressive politics and civil society. What made me speak out against gender identity policies were the extreme demands and the vicious campaigns against those who dared to question them. As a politician, I felt I had the responsibility and the opportunity to make a difference.
Deanna retweeted
STONEWALL LOGIC
- We want to take the heat out of the debate.
- How?
- By having you arrested.
Stonewall has been given unprecedented access to Downing Street and helped the Labour Government draw up its “chilling” Conversion Practices Bill.
The Telegraph has revealed that the controversial charity has been supplying Downing Street with research to justify the proposed law.
Under the Bill, parents, therapists and religious leaders could face up to five years in prison for having important conversations with gender-confused children or sharing their faith’s teachings on sex, gender and marriage with their congregations.
Stonewall’s head of policy was reportedly invited to a meeting at 10 Downing Street to discuss the proposed law and made recommendations to the MPs scrutinising the Bill.
Dennis Kavanagh, director of the Gay Men’s Network and a criminal barrister, said his organisation had not been offered similar meetings. He told The Telegraph: “The level of government access afforded to Stonewall is extraordinary, particularly in view of their extreme position on gender matters and their poor track record in accurately stating the law.”
Published in June, the Bill’s impact assessment cited a Stonewall survey to argue that conversion practices were so prevalent that new legislation was needed — even though conversion practices are already illegal.
Read more below 👇
Deanna retweeted
“Mothers are often closest to their children – they need to be brave and strong and look after their children. If parents are criminalised and families divided, it is mothers who will be affected.”
Well said @ToniaAntoniazzi telegraph.co.uk/politics/202…
Deanna retweeted
Lord Glasman said “Putting parents at risk of prosecution for trying to protect their children is something no Labour government should even consider.”
Deanna retweeted
The government is taking advice on who to lock up from a woman who wants to lock up all the people she asked to pray for her, including herself.
In evidence, Jayne Ozanne who appears to believe that her own internal battles with her faith could have been sorted with legislation, was clear that she wants prayer criminalised, including any help sought by the individual in question.
She records a counsellor telling her that she would just have to change her religion if she felt her sexuality was incompatible. But she didn't want that.
Ozanne once told the Guardian that “gentle, non-coercive prayer” should be outlawed. She also wants to ban ‘praying alone’ - who the criminal is in this circumstance is not explained!
Ozanne has admitted she was not open about her sexuality and did not discuss it with her pastoral support group. Later she asked for supportive prayers from "kind and loving" people to ask that she find someone to settle down with and have a family. She claims that at this point she was confused about her sexuality and had boyfriends.
So what does she really want? Ozanne claims to remain an Evangelical Christian so she clearly wasn't kicked out. She wasn't held in a cult or subject to abuse, she simply asked others in a religion she claims she wishes to belong to, to pray for her to achieve happiness.
Freedom of religion is an important human right. The state has a duty to ensure that harm, terror, or abuse is not carried out in the name of faith, but it has no business interfering in anyone's inner life.
The Church of England is right to be concerned.
Deanna retweeted
Parents not only have a right but an obligation to protect children from this. The Conversion Practices Bill would risk criminalising parents who objected to this, provided their child got sufficiently upset by the refusal.
This is a devastating and characteristically perceptive article by Hadley Freeman of the Times pointing out that the tyrannical conversion bill is a bait and switch and exploits real gay pain.
This is a journalist who really understand this.
thetimes.com/article/20cad62…
Deanna retweeted
Not had a response from @Humanists_UK yet. Would be most grateful for their views on my analysis of this article which I consider a wholly misleading attempt to minimise the distress and pain caused to this mother.
1/ Humanists UK believe they've conducted a "fact check" on a Telegraph piece in which a mother of a trans identifying daughter sets out her fears of the conversion bill.
I intend to defend the mother and her well justified fears in this thread.
humanists.uk/2026/11/05/tele…
Deanna retweeted
In evidence, Jayne Ozanne who appears to believe that her own internal battles with her faith could have been sorted with legislation, was clear that she wants prayer criminalised, including any help sought by the individual in question.
She records a counsellor telling her that she would just have to change her religion if she felt her sexuality was incompatible. But she didn't want that.
Ozanne once told the Guardian that “gentle, non-coercive prayer” should be outlawed. She also wants to ban ‘praying alone’ - who the criminal is in this circumstance is not explained!
Ozanne has admitted she was not open about her sexuality and did not discuss it with her pastoral support group. Later she asked for supportive prayers from "kind and loving" people to ask that she find someone to settle down with and have a family. She claims that at this point she was confused about her sexuality and had boyfriends.
So what does she really want? Ozanne claims to remain an Evangelical Christian so she clearly wasn't kicked out. She wasn't held in a cult or subject to abuse, she simply asked others in a religion she claims she wishes to belong to, to pray for her to achieve happiness.
Freedom of religion is an important human right. The state has a duty to ensure that harm, terror, or abuse is not carried out in the name of faith, but it has no business interfering in anyone's inner life.
The Church of England is right to be concerned.
The Church of England has warned that Labour’s proposed trans law risks criminalising prayer and pastoral support.
Get this front page story here ⬇️
telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/11…
The amount of crowdfunders that would be swelled by philanthropic orgs who actively promote trans. It would be Lawfare on crack.