Judith C. (@WithoutJudith) header
Judith C. (@WithoutJudith) profile picture

Existentialism and critical philosophy of race • PhD student @penn_state • Unionized @cge_psu • Member @centrecodsa • “Nothing human is alien to me.”

Joined June 2021
Photo by Judith C. (@WithoutJudith)Photo by Judith C. (@WithoutJudith)Photo by Judith C. (@WithoutJudith)Photo by Judith C. (@WithoutJudith)Photo by Judith C. (@WithoutJudith)Photo by Judith C. (@WithoutJudith)Photo by Judith C. (@WithoutJudith)Photo by Judith C. (@WithoutJudith)Photo by Judith C. (@WithoutJudith)Photo by Judith C. (@WithoutJudith)
Angelus Novus, 1920
2
3
211
14,074
I met the man himself.
48
222
33
7,316
200,920
Determination is the weight pressing down on the brains of the living from the tradition of former generations in the form of congealed abstract labor — the intangible trait shared by by all commodities. The living nonetheless act!
2
11
251
Judith C. retweeted
To be clear, it was the biggest night for Christian liberalism, not leftism. What we actually need is the militant, class-conscious Christianity of Jacques Roux and Ernesto Cardenal.
Tonight is the biggest night for America’s Christian Left in a century.
4
8
48
1,655
Nice hair day + fall weather + a beautiful class teaching undergrads about sexuality and freedom in Merleau-Ponty = 🌝
1
61
2,013
Judith C. retweeted
"Marx was able to develop a more adequate theory of the capitalist mode of production because he took as his starting point the experience of the working class. This is why Marx’s work was able to speak to the experience of the working class." Another Simon Clarke banger.
3
17
82
2,621
Communists who have no illusions, who do not give way to despondency, and who preserve their strength and flexibility ‘to begin from the beginning’ over and over again in approaching an extremely dificult task, are not doomed (and in all probability will not perish). — V.I Lenin
9
150
6
962
16,749
Judith C. retweeted
To educate the masses politically... means to try, relentlessly and passionately, to teach the masses that everything depends on them. Frantz Fanon
4
447
15
1,455
24,077
We could all stand to be a little more dialectical about the Enlightenment, and not merely in the hand waving sense of vaguely acknowledging good things and bad things at once. The Enlightenment names many antagonistic historical possibilities, only some of which were realized.
An issue I have with the modern left™ is that I think the enlightenment was a good thing and a significant portion of them don't
3
1
50
3,691
It is my sincere belief that Nickel Boys is the best film ever made because it uses all of the powers of the medium to capture a single time and place in its very historical essence. Just as some of the best literature is written by poets, the best film is made by a photographer.
We’ve moved on way too quickly from Nickel Boys
2
1
21
1,456
Hart Crane
1
19
1,099
I have red-ish hair now. Attend my upcoming presentations at Historical Materialism London and the Society of Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy, where I will be single handedly redefining the future of Marxism, to see it in person.
6
3
105
2,656
The most important scene in You Can See Everything is when Nathan Fielder shows Elizabeth Holmes the Abbott and Costello routine where neither one can understand the other. He asks her to explain it and she eventually breaks down. Fielder is being a great psychoanalyst here!
5
31
3
1,508
34,349
He is attempting to access her unconscious indirectly by getting her to interpret images that can represent the unconscious material, and he succeeds. We discover a fundamental contradiction that she cannot reconcile: she is lying and will not let herself know that she is lying.
2
3
1
296
5,196
Deleuze: “…phenomenology has had three moments: the large Hegelian structures, then Husserl’s semiology, the study of sense…but finally something very different started with Sartre. Sartre introduced a full pragmatics into phenomenology, and converted it into this pragmatics.”
9
24
334
9,655
I learned about this passage from a wonderful presenter in the North American Sartre Society panel that I was in. The source text is unknown, but I would love to find out!
1
1
27
1,388
I seem to have found it, but unfortunately it is not published except as an excerpt in a book by Jeannette Colombel. Here is some explanation and another very rich part of the passage:
1
3
30
1,017
“To explain how the strangest metaphysical claims of a philosopher really come about, it is always good (and wise) to begin by asking: what morality is it (is he) getting at? … There is absolutely nothing impersonal about the philosopher.” -Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, 1.6
2
2
17
689
We speak far too much of ‘structures’ and far too little about *systems,* and that is the crux of the problem as it concerns the present state of the ruthless criticism of all that exists
4
11
3
113
4,724
I am reading Lenin’s account of the fall of the Second International, where we find the most succinct and elegant definition of Marxism:
5
137
6
1,021
13,494