Milind

When you remove the IDE entirely, why is being hunched over a computer screen the right form factor for managing coding agents? Feels like vibe coders should be able to walk in a park while seeing outputs with AR glasses, clarifying instructions through voice. Coding needs to change. You don't drive a car designed as a horse carriage.

There are some sacred cows in crypto that just stick around forever and refuse to die. The post-airdrop "50% to community" allocation, which we all know means "an amorphous slush fund that we'll decide what to do with later" is a cow whose time has come. Good on @jon_charb for trying to push the Overton window here. Investors generally slash the "economically equivalent FDV" by ~50% in their minds when there are these enormous community allocations. This is very true of HYPE—the FDV is effectively overstated, because these tokens won't get spent unless there's a clear ROI, which makes HYPE nominally undervalued on a cash flow : FDV ratio. This whole "50% of tokens must be labeled 'community'" is a holdover of performative 2021 token socialism. We should just get rid of it so we can be straightforward about expected supply and circulation. Spending tokens on growth is fine—just do it transparently and justify it. Go to governance, argue for the supply expansion, and let holders decide. But ~50% of the total supply up front to do whatever with is silly and we should end it.