Joined February 2018
#ACGAS Siegfried = horse; Audrey = chicken. Surprisingly on-the-nose metaphors - blockages cleared! Hers was smaller than his... may they come together in joy and love.
182
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
While Catholics in Germany engage in endless naval gazing in an attempt to justify dismantling their own credibility, an ancient Catholic community that has survived persecution, war and the horrors of ISIS is fighting for something much more fundamental: its continued existence in the land where Christianity first took root. There's been an extraordinary gathering in Rome which really deserves our attention. The bishops of the Chaldean Catholic Church met from 16–19 October under their new Patriarch, Mar Polis III Nona, to consider the future of one of Christianity's oldest surviving communities. Their final statement addresses everything from priestly formation and liturgical renewal to the preservation of Christian identity among the enormous diaspora created by decades of violence and instability in Iraq. The Chaldean Church is in full communion with Rome, but possesses its own ancient Eastern liturgical and ecclesiastical traditions. Its spiritual inheritance reaches back to the Christianity of Mesopotamia and its liturgy preserves Syriac, a form of Aramaic closely related to the language spoken by Our Lord. Consider what this community has endured. Following the invasion of Iraq in 2003, Christians faced successive waves of intimidation, kidnappings, church bombings and murder. The rise of ISIS brought further devastation, with Christian families driven from Mosul and the Nineveh Plain, often abandoning homes and communities that had existed for centuries. The consequences have been catastrophic. Iraq's Christian population, once estimated at more than 1.5 million, has fallen dramatically. Many of those who fled have rebuilt their lives in Europe, Australia and North America, leaving the Church confronting an agonising question: how do you preserve an ancient Christian civilisation when so many of its people can no longer safely live in their ancestral homeland? This is what makes the Chaldean Synod's deliberations so interesting. The bishops have committed themselves to strengthening priestly formation, reviewing their ecclesiastical regulations and developing a Liturgical Directory intended to preserve the sacredness, fidelity and beauty of their worship. WOW! That last point particularly caught my attention! Here is a Church that has experienced persecution, displacement and demographic collapse, yet its bishops recognise that preserving the integrity of their inherited liturgical tradition is essential to the future of their communities. What a contrast with Traditiones custodes! Their approach is not simply about maintaining an attractive cultural inheritance. The liturgy is where successive generations discover themselves to be members of a Church whose identity transcends national boundaries and political upheaval. There is surely a lesson here for those of us in the West. From the way some prelates speak, you would think liturgical tradition were an optional aesthetic preference, something to be adjusted according to contemporary pastoral fashions. For communities such as the Chaldeans, the connection between worship, faith and identity is considerably more immediate. Their traditions have helped sustain them through circumstances most Western Catholics can scarcely imagine. But the Synod also recognises that preserving the past is not sufficient and so it calls for better formation, stronger pastoral care, support for families and young people and practical solidarity between prosperous communities abroad and those struggling to survive in Iraq. There is a tension here which deserves serious consideration. The diaspora provides financial support, political advocacy and opportunities for families who might otherwise face an uncertain future. But every generation that establishes itself permanently overseas also makes the restoration of a substantial Christian presence in Iraq more difficult. Patriarch Nona knows something of this personally, as Archbishop of Mosul, he was forced into exile when ISIS seized the city in 2014. He subsequently served the Chaldean community in Australia before being elected Patriarch earlier this year. Perhaps the most moving aspect of the gathering was the celebration of the Chaldean Divine Liturgy in St Peter's Basilica on 15 October, bringing the prayers and sacred chants of this ancient Eastern Church into the very heart of Catholicism. It was also a powerful reminder that Catholic unity does not require liturgical uniformity irrespective of what Pope Francis and Cardinal Roche have attempted to assert to the contrary. The Church's communion embraces distinct and venerable traditions, each contributing something precious to the whole. We devote enormous attention to the internal controversies of Western Catholicism, but perhaps we should spend more time listening to Christians whose immediate concerns are preserving their faith, their families, their liturgy and their very presence in the lands of the Apostles. Their survival is not merely a matter of cultural preservation, it's a question of whether Christianity will continue to possess a living, worshipping presence in places where the Gospel has been proclaimed for nearly two thousand years.
4
31
105
3,447
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
Goosebumps. For all its faults, Western Christian culture is still worth defending.
1,811
8,181
2,586
47,232
19,823,779
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
The most terrifying thing about contemporary politics is not so much the multiple potential crises we face - energy shortages, AI destabilisation, crippling cyberattacks, WWIII kicking off, possible civil strife etc. It's the total lack of responsible statesmen, on all sides. Everyone playing politics like it's a performative game where actions don't have consequences and you can just play-act as glorified activists and continue to ride your luxury hobby horses. But please wake up: a world where you can play make believe politics as a form of elite therapy or pandering to idiots or moral grandstanding does not exist anymore. Maybe it did for a decade or two, but we're not in Kansas anymore Toto. Pretty soon people are going to wake up to the fact that the decisions governments make have real consequences, and that a never-never world where everything is basically ok and you can ignore the underlying realities has gone. And I mean real consequences, not some people being sad about some meaningless gesture that has or hasn't happened or some abstract bullshit cause not working out for people, or even a bit of a dip in living standards. I mean not having water or electricity; being cold in winter; your savings or investments becoming literally worthless overnight; riots in the street on a regular basis disrupting your life; your sons coming back in body bags in large numbers; supermarkets not having food; cyberattacks making the simplest thing impossible; payment systems going down. So all I want now is reality-based responsible statesmen or women who grasp the scale of our problems and take decisions that will stave off the chaos and keep us save and warm and fed. Not popularity seeking lightweights and spivs. Not grandstanding ideologically deranged cranks. Not complacent liberals who live in an eternal 1997. Some actual grown ups who tell the truth, who will take long-term decisions, who will risk unpopularity, who will hold the line. I'm not holding my breath.
26
110
20
570
25,229
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
PLEASE could you all help and get this past the 10,000 signatures.
56
332
8
759
49,196
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
Jason Arday’s death is tragic. But please spare us the sanctimonious complaints that he was merely an ‘obscure’ academic who was the victim of a racist witch-hunt. The probing and questioning and exposure were entirely legitimate. Arday was plainly guilty of plagiarism. He had also made a series of fantastical claims about his life and career. He ended up being appointed as a professor at one of the world’s most august seats of learning – where his students, who had worked extremely hard to get there, were paying large fees for the privilege of being taught by him. Far from being obscure, Arday had happily engaged with the media over many years, often repeating his false claims. He appeared on numerous TV shows and guest edited Radio 4’s flagship Today programme. He even carried the Olympic torch. Moreover, he had secured a major publishing deal for his autobiography, which was set to be released in Britain and the US just as the scandal broke. By no measure was this man ‘obscure’. When a fellow academic in Plymouth began to question his credentials, Arday (or someone close to him) made a complaint to the police. When a journalist from Times Higher Education started investigating, he was subjected to a police inquiry and also received a threatening letter from the leading libel solicitors, Carter Ruck. Arday and those around him were clearly not averse to hounding others when they felt like it. It’s very possible that Arday did not have sufficient support measures in place when he was finally exposed – but that’s on others. The investigation and questions amounted to legitimate journalistic inquiry. This was never just about Arday’s fabulism. It was also about the increasingly controversial philosophy of DEI, the obsession of our political, corporate and educational institutions with pushing that philosophy, and how it might have led to someone with Arday’s subpar credentials being appointed in the first place. These are all valid questions to ask – and, by asking them, journalists are simply doing their jobs.
949
3,572
280
21,283
629,710
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
No se me ocurre nada más alucinante que esperar a un eclipse solar REAL para rodar una escena. Esto es lo que hizo Richard Fleischer para retratar la crucifixión de Jesucristo en "Barrabás"(1961). A pesar del riesgo de tener una única oportunidad de dos minutos y cuarenta y cinco segundos, se acordó retrasar el rodaje de la escena hasta el 15 de febrero de 1961, momento en el que ocurriría el fenómeno astronómico. El resultado es simplemente increíble y único en la cinematografía mundial.
65
2,249
65
13,564
894,265
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
Every appointment in which demographic optics outweigh merit displaces somebody else. Every weak paper contaminates the literature and can influence policy. Every pound of funding allocated on criteria other than research quality is unavailable for potentially groundbreaking work. Yet those in the privileged position of academia rarely recognise their own privilege. Nobody at Cambridge appears to have asked the obvious questions. The Lords, Dames, Sirs and Professors who rushed first to celebrate Arday and then to denounce his critics never have to worry about losing a faculty position or a research grant – they already have theirs. They can pull up the drawbridge while making themselves feel, and look, virtuous by saluting the flag of DEI. Indeed, the most revealing aspect of the [Hilary] Cremin video was not what she said, but that Cambridge chose to film it, publicise it and celebrate it. Universities appoint outstanding academics every year. They do not normally produce promotional videos announcing their moral satisfaction with the appointment. Whatever final judgement is reached on the plagiarism allegations, Arday is not the point. Institutions saw a story that flattered their values and forgot to ask whether it was true. Academia should be society’s most sceptical institution. If it cannot scrutinise its own heroes, it has no moral authority to instruct anyone else. My @Telegraph op-ed on the Jason Arday affair. telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/08…
20
130
18
712
26,900
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
58
700
39
3,942
107,115
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
1
14
83
4,906
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
William Clouston (@WilliamClouston), SDP, is standing to give the people of Clacton full and fair debate. 👇 @UKLabour won't serve Clacton. @Conservatives won't serve Clacton. @LibDems won't serve Clacton. @TheGreenParty won't serve Clacton. We will.
146
279
111
1,048
317,658
Conceived in privilege, sold in sentiment, marinaded in superstition, flying in the face of evidence, funded by state capture corporates, aimed at the vulnerable
Lauren Edwards publishing deeply flawed Assisted Dying Bill today. 🚨MPs asked to back reckless Parliament Acts Plan and reject all changes 🚨 Refused to address concerns raised by Royal Colleges, EHRC, and domestic abuse orgs etc. 🚨 No promise to back changes in the Lords 1/
10
73
3
174
11,075
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
Yet again, we can barely hear the Prime Minister speaking on the steps of Downing Street because someone is blasting music in the background and nobody seems able or willing to stop it. For me, it is symbolic of a country that has lost its sense of seriousness. We cannot even ensure that a national address from the heart of government can be heard properly. Small things matter because they reflect a wider culture. I am tired of living in a country that increasingly seems incapable of doing basic things with competence and authority.
342
605
31
4,838
130,832
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
ngl these hydration breaks are getting out of hand
1,077
29,791
1,270
476,523
9,579,871
In response to MPs reintroducing the deadly Assisted Dying Bill, Archbishop John Wilson said: “Assisted suicide has no place in a civilised society. It violates the God-given dignity of human life and puts the vulnerable – especially elderly and disabled people – in grave danger. “As followers of the Lord Jesus, we have a duty to speak out and to act when the lives of so many people are at risk. That is why I urge Catholics to pray and to campaign to stop this deadly bill from becoming law” ewtnnews.com/world/europe/ca…
13
69
10
199
21,595
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
Replying to @ObhishekSaha
I’m a liberal, not a libertarian. My rights to autonomy end where they entail the loss of freedom for others. We know that AD means that people will die through coercive control, self coercion and through desperation because of awful and inequitable access to palliative care.
18
77
10
571
15,613
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
The assisted suicide Bill is a dangerous mess of a Bill, with fewer safeguards than when it began. If the exact same shambles is revived, it will face strong opposition. Labour MP Lauren Edwards to reintroduce assisted suicide Bill theguardian.com/society/2026…
436
21
1,322
41,522
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
Holyrood rejected AD because - despite a majority supporting the principle - MSPs properly scrutinised their bill and listened to expert opinion. The supporters of AD in Westminster appear to have learnt nothing from this…
1. This statement contains several inaccurate or confused claims. First, Edwards says the bill is only for those “at the very end of their lives.” But the bill’s “6-month prognosis” criterion is very broad: 1 in 5 of those eligible will actually have at least 3 years to live.
8
74
2
359
8,928
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
Lauren Edwards MP statement says “[The TIA bill] was rightly described as the safest and most robust assisted dying law anywhere in the world” No. It was only described this way by the people trying to push it through. Here is how others described the Bill: 1. The Royal College of Physicians said the Bill is unsafe 2. The Royal College of Psychiatrists said the Bill is unworkable, and unsafe 3. The British Geriatrics Society said the Bill’s safeguards are not adequate 4. Domestic abuse charities said the Bill is unsafe 5. Organisations representing disabled people said the Bill is unsafe 6. Royal College of GPs says the Bill lacks adequate safeguards 7. Lord Stevens, ex NHS CEO, said legislating for assisted dying in the current climate of hospice cuts is “utterly ridiculous” 8. MIND says the safeguards are not adequate 9. The CLADD group at KCL (DOI) have said the Bill is “not fit for purpose” 10. The British Association of Social Workers say the Bill’s is not safe enough Spot the pattern?
21
570
23
1,187
82,850
Bridie Macmahon retweeted
What dismal news that the Assisted Suicide bill is coming back. They are hoping to use the Parliamentary override to force it through without any of the improvements and safeguards offered in the Lords last time including by the Bill’s advocates like Lord Falconer. We’re going to be offered the same bill that left the Commons (left with lots of ‘oh the Lords will clean up that glaring problem, don’t worry just pass it’) on a take-it-or-leave-it, unamendable basis. Even if you accept the case for assisted dying this Bill is terrible, far too expansive and full of holes to be filled in after it’s in statute… but the advocates know they’ll never have a such a ‘progressive’ Parliament for years, so it’s now or never. So they’re trying to push through a dangerous bill that they admitted needed significant improvement, because it’s their last chance. They must be stopped.
196
1,552
53
4,777
105,873