Just so we are clear on what kind of regime we are dealing with… Ayatollah Khomenei on child marriage: “It’s not permissible to have vaginal intercourse with a wife before she completes 9 years [of age], whether the marriage is permanent or temporary. As for other enjoyments — such as touching with lust, embracing, and thighing (rubbing between the thighs) — there is no objection to them, even with a suckling infant. If he has vaginal intercourse with her before [the age of] nine and does not cause ifda' (injury), nothing results from it except sin, according to the stronger opinion. If he causes ifda' — by making the urinary and menstrual passages one, or the menstrual and fecal passages one — vaginal intercourse with her becomes permanently forbidden to him forever; however, this is according to caution in the second case. In any case, she does not exit from being his wife according to the stronger opinion, so the rulings of marriage apply to her: inheritance, the prohibition of a fifth [wife], the prohibition of her sister along with her, and other [rulings]. He is obligated to provide her maintenance (nafaqah) as long as she lives, even if he divorces her, and even if she marries after the divorce — according to caution; indeed, this is not devoid of strength [i.e., it has weight]. He is also obligated to pay the diyah (blood money) for the ifda', which is the diyah of a soul [full blood money]. If she is free, she is entitled to half the diyah of a man, in addition to the mahr (dowry) that she is entitled to by the contract and the consummation. If he has intercourse with his wife after she completes nine [years] and causes ifda', she is not forbidden to him, and the diyah is not due; however, the cautious opinion is to provide maintenance for her as long as she lives, though the stronger opinion is that it is not obligatory”

Hello Mrs. Owens, You told millions of people that Tyler Robinson "wasn't even there." That you felt "confident stating that Tyler Robinson did not kill murder Charlie Kirk." He was on camera. Prone on the Losi rooftop at 12:22. Shot at 12:23:28. DNA on the screwdriver at 30 quintillion to one. DNA on the rifle at 1.7 octillion to one. He told his family what he did. His parents helped him surrender. He texted his roommate: "I am, I'm sorry." He engraved "Hey Fascist! Catch!" on the ammunition a month before he used it. You said police "didn't even question" Lance Twiggs. He was interviewed twice. FBI the morning after. Joint state-federal team seven months later. His own attorney. Voluntary phone surrender. You laughed when you said it. You told Shawn Ryan a shaped charge killed Charlie. That PETN was in his microphone. The medical examiner says gunshot wound. Bullet fragments were recovered from his body. A .30-06 Mauser with Robinson's DNA was found in the woods. Neither side — not prosecution, not defense — has mentioned explosives. Not once in four days. You said the shot came from below. The Losi building is above the amphitheater. You called Erika Kirk a "clinical psychopath" to an audience of millions. You said the assassination was "an occult ritual." You said Charlie was "sitting in a pentagram." You told people Israel killed him because he refused Netanyahu. You made over a hundred episodes. You built a franchise on a dead man's name. And the hardest fact of all: Tyler Robinson's own defense lawyers — the people whose entire career is on the line to get him acquitted — have refused to make a single one of your arguments. Not one. They're challenging DNA methodology. They are doing their jobs. You were doing something else entirely. Charlie Kirk changed my life. He platformed my work when nobody knew who I was. He had my back when I was doxxed. I was the ten-thousandth most important person in his world and I will never be able to repay him. So I did what I know how to do. I read every transcript. I watched every hour of testimony. I cataloged your claims and I held them up against what was said under oath. Every single one failed. I don't know why you did this. I'm not going to speculate on your motives, because that would make me exactly the kind of analyst I've spent my career refusing to be. But I know what you did. You told people confident lies about a dead man's murder, and millions of them believed you, and some of them turned that belief into threats against his widow. The trial continues. And every day of sworn testimony is another day your words get tested against reality... under oath, on the record, where it counts. I'll be here for all of it... because just as Charlie defended me, I will do what little I can to defend his legacy and @TPUSA and @MrsErikaKirk from evil.