CODEF(x)

Had a lot of fun building this model An ML-powered tool that can analyze and optimize racing lines, compare strategies across drivers, and deconstruct strategic decisions at race starts Loads to do still but progress! Stay tuned! #F1 #IndyCar #Motorsport

😮‍💨

😬

🫡

Okay! Fair enough—you are saying the solution is that Elkann should INCREASE the distance to the F1 team and not decrease it (like I’m suggesting) It’s a fair point btw Thanks for engaging! Appreciate all of the comments!

Yes—but he does not hold unanimous governance.

Here is a devil’s advocate position—The WEC team is succeeding under Elkann’s leadership which he can point to to suggest his effectiveness. Just not the F1 team. Okay let me ask you this—what would you suggest? Given the existing structure

Yes—but he is not the only board member And if his responsibilities shift more towards trackside outcomes; then that means his decisions are significantly more consequential to his own position

Though, the counter to all of this is the performance of the WEC team

I agree with you—I think his responsibilities (and therefore accountability) ought to be anchored to trackside performance. Right now he can take material decisions about trackside operations without consequence to his own position

😅

😅

🫡

😅😅😅

Zak is a key decision maker—and he won last year Toto is a key decision maker and he won this year Whoever that is for Ferrari, should be trackside as well Only a hypothesis, of course :)

Sorry—tried to save space 😅 Year over year = YoY Typically, if you tether performance responsibilities to board members that ultimately aren’t satisfied, then you can remove them. My suggestion is to tether trackside performance—since that doesn’t seem to be the case

😅

😅

Who would you say, is the key decision maker for Ferrari trackside operations? Whoever that person is—bring them trackside

😅