Diane Jones retweeted
Today, we thought of several, meaningful changes @JohnSwinney could make to help women and girls & stand firm against MVAW. We'd be delighted to share them - will he meet us?
Diane Jones retweeted
A reminder to the vocal gender zealots in the children's publishing industy that the vast majority of the population do not view JK Rowling or her opinions, as evil.
Diane Jones retweeted
Israel must immediately open all Gaza crossings and let humanitarian aid in, starting with new tents and modular housing, clean water, nutrient-rich food, medicines. If by 9am tomorrow Israel still refuses, any principled leader would send humanitarian vessels to break the siege.
Diane Jones retweeted
"Of course, nobody should ever be subjected to violence, threats, child abuse or harassment. But these examples of abuse are already criminalised under existing legislation." Labour MP @GlindonMary speaks out - we know other MPs are similarly concerned.
politics.co.uk/2026/11/the-d…
Diane Jones retweeted
Replying to @TwisterFilm
No one wants to say the quiet part aloud: grooming a little boy to be a little girl implicitly means that the child is being prepped for penetration.
I understand why people don't want to say this or acknowledge it, though.
Diane Jones retweeted
It's no coincidence David Walliams wrote 'Boy in a Dress' about a boy groomed into wearing women's clothes by a local cross-dresser. Misogyny runs through autogynephilia just as it does Walliams' alleged sexual predation. Also who draws knobs on a children's book? 🤦♂️👇👇👇
Diane Jones retweeted
Good morning National Portrait Gallery @NPGLondon. Bev Jackson is missing from Tim Walker's "Fairyland" exhibition.
Bev was the spokeswoman at the 1970 Gay Liberation March which inspired Tim's exhibition. Don't you think she should be included?
Please discuss with Tim as I am sure you would not want to be seen to exclude such a key figure in our nation's history?
#whereisBev
Replying to @Kathari17674744
We clearly need an urgent 'Where's Bev?' email campaign to @NPGLondon.
Maybe they could use this perfectly nice one pending a properly commissioned Tim Walker portrait? @BevJacksonAuth
Diane Jones retweeted
Replying to @Kathari17674744
We clearly need an urgent 'Where's Bev?' email campaign to @NPGLondon.
Maybe they could use this perfectly nice one pending a properly commissioned Tim Walker portrait? @BevJacksonAuth
Diane Jones retweeted
Replying to @duchess_elle
Hope this happens for the kids who are being sterilized under the banner of “trans rights”.
Looking forward to seeing the fallout.
Glad Leilani found some minor form of validation and payment for the assault made upon her by her own shitty mother and the ever shittier government.
That poor woman.
Diane Jones retweeted
Replying to @duchess_elle
Hi interviewed Leilani Muir back in 1993 for a long feature I wrote on eugenics. She was such a lovely woman and I was so pleased when she won her lawsuit!
Diane Jones retweeted
Replying to @duchess_elle
My aunt was part of this secret sterilization- my grandparents were never informed until after the operation. And yes, she was compensated, but my God , how evil humans can be towards other humans..
Diane Jones retweeted
Hundreds of other Albertans who had been sterilized under the same law came forward. Close to 850 of them were eventually compensated, with damages totalling about $142 million. The province apologized.
The Eugenics Board had approved the sterilization of more than 2,800 people between 1928 and 1972.
One waitress from Calgary was the first to make Alberta answer for it.
In 1996, the National Film Board released a documentary, The Sterilization of Leilani Muir. It is still used in classrooms.
She spent the rest of her life speaking about what happened. She wrote a memoir, A Whisper Past: Childless after Eugenic Sterilization in Alberta. She joined a research project on the history of eugenics in Western Canada, so that the records would never quietly disappear.
She settled in Devon, Alberta, surrounded by her pets.
She died at home on March 14, 2016. She was 71.
Consider what every consent form you have ever signed in a hospital stands on.
The idea that nobody gets to decide what happens to your body without telling you the truth first.
Leilani Muir never got that promise.
She spent her life making sure the rest of us do.
Diane Jones retweeted
In 1959, doctors in Alberta told a 14-year-old girl they were taking out her appendix.
They were not.
It took her nearly forty years to make the province admit what it had really done.
She was born in Calgary on July 15, 1944.
Her family was poor. They moved constantly. At home, she was unwanted, and she was abused.
When she was eight, her mother placed her in a convent for a month. A year later, her mother applied to have her committed to the Provincial Training School for Mental Defectives in Red Deer.
There was no bed free.
So the girl waited two years.
On July 12, 1955, just before her 11th birthday, she was admitted. No doctor tested her first. The admission rested entirely on what her mother said about her.
She thought she was being sent to an orphanage.
Her name was Leilani Muir.
And a condition of her entry had already been signed. Her mother had given written permission for her to be sterilized.
Think about what that actually meant.
A child walked through those doors, and the decision about whether she would ever have children of her own had already been made by somebody else.
Alberta had passed its Sexual Sterilization Act in 1928. A small government panel, the Eugenics Board, decided who was "fit" to have children. Low test scores, poverty, being Catholic, being an immigrant's daughter, being Indigenous, being in an institution at all. Any of it could put you in front of the Board.
More than two years after she arrived, Leilani was taken to a clinic in Calgary for an intelligence test.
She scored 64.
The Board labelled her a "moron." Her file noted her Irish and Polish background, her Catholic faith, and that she had "shown definite interest in the opposite sex."
They ordered her sterilized.
Nobody told her.
On January 19, 1959, surgeons destroyed both of her fallopian tubes. She was told it was her appendix.
She stayed in the institution until she was 20. She had been taught to about a Grade 5 level.
In 1965, she walked out into the world on her own.
She worked as a waitress. She married. She wanted a baby.
The baby never came.
Fertility tests finally gave her the answer. A doctor told her she had been deliberately sterilized, and that it could never be reversed.
She tried to adopt instead.
She was turned down. Her history as a former inmate of an institution followed her into every office.
Two marriages ended. The years went by. By 1989, living in British Columbia, she was depressed enough to seek professional help.
To see whether she was a good fit for group therapy, a psychologist gave her another intelligence test.
She scored 89.
Normal.
Here is the part that should make people angry.
The number the province had used to justify cutting her open had never measured her mind. It had measured a frightened, neglected child in an institution.
Leilani Muir decided to sue the Province of Alberta.
Nobody had ever done that before.
She had no money and no profile. She had a Grade 5 education and a file that called her mentally defective. Against her stood a provincial government with every resource it needed.
The case took years to reach a courtroom.
The trial opened on June 22, 1995, before Justice Joanne Veit of the Court of Queen's Bench. It ran four weeks.
On January 25, 1996, the judgment came down.
Leilani Muir won.
Justice Veit awarded her $740,780 in damages, plus $230,000 toward her legal costs.
And she wrote, plainly, what had been done: "In 1959, the province wrongfully surgically sterilized Ms. Muir."
The judge went further. She listed what the confinement had cost a young girl: loss of liberty, loss of reputation, humiliation and disgrace, pain and suffering, loss of normal developmental experiences, loss of contact with family and friends.
Thirty-seven years after the surgery.
Forty-one years after she first walked into that school.
Her win opened a door that could not be shut again.
Diane Jones retweeted
This is my post to @LinkedIn, if any of you are over there. I hope, though doubt, that @SportandRights will pay some attention. It's pretty shameless, and devalues any contribution that they might want to make in other areas where rights are infringed or violated in sport.
Diane Jones retweeted
Replying to @mozzer39 @catholicEW
This bill makes no difference between loving support and conversion practices. Is it wrong for a parent to tell their child truthfully that a boy can’t become a girl and vice versa. Is it wrong for a parent to say no to their daughter for wanting to wear a chest binder, because the parent is worried about the health risks it could cause. None of this is “pressuring” their child, it’s a parent being concerned for their child’s welfare. Saying no, and telling truthful facts could get you prosecuted, that is banning free speech.
Diane Jones retweeted
Replying to @mozzer39 @catholicEW
Isn’t that what parents are offering their confused, unsure child? Safety love and acceptance? Parents could well be prosecuted for having important conversations with their child, that come from a place of love they have for their child. It is a monstrous bill which will ban free speech.
Diane Jones retweeted
Replying to @mozzer39 @catholicEW
Telling vulnerable teens they’re the opposite sex instead of gay is abuse. That’s what was happening at the Tavistock gender clinic. The dark joke was ‘soon there will be no gay people left’.
Diane Jones retweeted
Replying to @mozzer39 @catholicEW
Exactly. “No one should be coerced into changing who they are.”
Boys are male. Forever.
Girls are female. Forever.
Stop telling kids they can change sex and lead them on a path towards body mutilation.
Love your one healthy body as it is. Treat it well! Honour it.

























