The female breast is structured for breastfeeding. The male breast is not. A baby can be fed more easily and safely with formula if that baby is not able to breastfeed from its own mother's breast than it can by sucking on a man's breast to ingest a liquid that has been chemically induced. There is rightly a stigma associated with men inducing babies to suck their nipples because it is not natural, necessary, or nutritious. The motivations of a man who does so will naturally be questioned because it is not normal behaviour, and the association with csa will inevitably be made. Child welfare is paramount, and people are right to question the motivations of any man who would induce an infant to suck his nipple. A newly breastfeeding mother will likely have her milk supply interrupted and be less able to maintain a reliable supply of milk for her bub without additional often painful and cumbersome procedures such as pumping and storage of her milk. The supply of milk that is chemically induced in a male breast does not have the same flow or ability to adapt to the babies suckling as a woman's breast. There is no need for a baby to suck on a man's breast to gain sustenance. It is very easy to conclude that the practice of inducing a baby to suck on a man's nipple is for the purpose of satisfying the desire of that man to perform a role that only a woman is equipped for (at best) or his desire for sexual arousal (at worst). Any man who does so is not prioritising the welfare of the bub or the new mother who needs support and practise when suckling an infant. He doesn't care about the stigma the child might face or the weirdness the child may feel when old enough to understand that s/he was induced to suck on a man's nipple when a helpless infant to satisfy the desires of the man. I can't understand anybody, let alone a woman, so vocally and forcefully supporting the practice of chemically inducing a liquid to be secreted from a man's nipple so a baby will suck on it.