Jon Munce (@jonmunce) header
Jon Munce (@jonmunce) profile picture

Love all, force none - 40 year student of political economy - survivor of cancer and decades of MN sports heartbreak - @iowahawkblog gave me a 'like', once.

Minnesota, USA
Joined February 2011
Photo by Jon Munce (@jonmunce)Photo by Jon Munce (@jonmunce)Photo by Jon Munce (@jonmunce)Photo by Jon Munce (@jonmunce)Photo by Jon Munce (@jonmunce)Photo by Jon Munce (@jonmunce)Photo by Jon Munce (@jonmunce)Photo by Jon Munce (@jonmunce)Photo by Jon Munce (@jonmunce)Photo by Jon Munce (@jonmunce)
Jon Munce retweeted
they said you re-signed Ayo Dosunmu for too much $ they said don’t re-sign Jaylen Clark they laughed at signing Trey Lyles they don’t know ball like you, Tim Connelly
3
20
1
662
6,767
BONJOUR À TOUS!
8
4
1
56
602
Jon Munce retweeted
Stunning double rainbow over NYC
8
171
22
1,595
25,745
So by zero sum reasoning, that means everyone else is now richer, right?
🚨 BREAKING: Elon Musk’s net worth dropped $80 billion in the past 6 hours.
66
380
9
7,797
68,030
We need to cut spending by $603 billion. ‘But that’s the whole budget,’ you say. I know.
4
11
89
944
Jon Munce retweeted
What if critics of Austrian economics offered real counterarguments instead of the vapid accusations and insults? But they won't, because it would likely just highlight the theory's strength. mises.org/mises-wire/wanted-…
2
6
45
1,277
Communists: Let's overthrow the government so we can replace it with one that's less accountable, faces fewer restrictions on its own power, and imposes more restrictions on everyone else, including ourselves. And let's call it liberation.
13
51
1
323
3,183
Jon Munce retweeted
~70% of people use AI every week. ~70% of people voted to ban data centers where it was on the ballot makes you wonder.
304
296
137
8,600
722,757
a little extra reason to smile at the rink
114
442
182
4,167
167,102
Jon Munce retweeted
WILD WIN!! Post-game coming up!
1
9
270
8,898
Jon Munce retweeted
“Elon is the enemy of the almighty State! A kulak, wrecker, and saboteur! Crush the running-dog capitalist swine and seize the means of production!” #ConservingConservatism
"SpaceX isn’t a tech company. It’s an aerospace and communications company. It is vital to America’s national security and it must be brought to heel and aligned with America’s interests." lnk.thebulwark.com/3We7Trq
20
71
1
419
8,926
Jon Munce retweeted
There's no way I can vote Republican when a bushel of gas costs like 19 doubloons.
238
255
21
3,857
50,518
Jon Munce retweeted
Replying to @VoteHub
Guam flipped. Hank Johnson vindicated.
46
36
8
409
54,342
This is an amazing data point. Isn't it ironic that some of the most capitalist companies excelled at the unfulfilled socialist dream of workers owning the means of production?
5
20
5
78
12,368
At what point do we stop focusing on who needs to pay more tax and start asking where all of our tax money is going.
1,704
11,713
439
96,486
1,442,608
Jon Munce retweeted
Christopher Nolan has reportedly secured a $650M budget from Apple and IMAX for his upcoming Tom Cruise and Keanu Reeves sci-fi heist movie. To achieve maximum realism, Nolan is reportedly refusing to use CGI and will instead detonate a real decommissioned satellite in low Earth orbit.
199
553
188
8,639
473,865
Jon Munce retweeted
Her family were persecuted Mongolian immigrants, and as a young girl she spoke out against oppression by the Chinese Communist Party. What you're seeing here is not tribal wars, it's the result of brainwashing in American schools.
Democrats imported 3rd world tribal wars. Oh goodie.
204
989
48
5,781
130,134
Alguien todavía duda de que Milei es el mejor Presidente de la historia?
Miren el amor de la gente No hay chance alguna que @JMilei no sea releecto De todas maneras ANULEN MUFA SABANDIJAS 👇
39
53
2
346
10,448
1. More billionaires are associated with less poverty. 2. Increasing billionaires per capita by ten fold lowers poverty by 43 percentage points. 3. Sweden has more billionaires per 10M people than the U.S. (34 vs 30) 4. Correlation is fairly strong (R-squared of 0.6 for two variable cross-section data) 4. Since the graph is only a correlation, what do you think is the cause? 🔗in🧵
328
1,023
244
5,092
448,006