“The great enemy of truth is very often not the lie -deliberate, contrived and dishonest -but the myth -persistent, persuasive and unrealistic" ~John F Kennedy

Joined September 2009
Where there is no voluntary informed consent, medicine becomes a violent act. No mandates.
4
37
4
97
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
Overtuigend. Deze dr. in de wiskunde weet met overtuiging uit te leggen dat Bolsonaro met 60 á 65 procent van de stemmen gewonnen heeft. Ja, mijn professie is statistiek, als directeur van een gerenommeerd onderzoeksbureau. Deze man heeft gelijk. Geen speld tussen te krijgen.
ELEIÇÃO ROUBADA NO BRASIL? 🇧🇷 BRAZIL ELECTION STEAL? 🇺🇸 🇧🇷Este professor de matemática aponta que os dados divulgados pelo TSE na noite da eleição, no Brasil, revelam padrões de alterações algorítmicas que prejudicaram @FlavioBolsonaro à medida que a apuração avançava. Ele estima que Flavio deveria ter vencido com cerca de 65% dos votos. 🇺🇸This mathematics professor shows the data that came out of the TSE on election night in Brazil shows patterns of algorithmic shifts that penalized @FlavioBolsonaro as the counts came in. He projects that Flavio should have won by about 65% of the vote.
176
2,343
80
9,361
152,265
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
I went to the movies recently and was appalled when the previews started rolling pharmaceutical ads. Right there in the theater. It immediately brought back my father’s words. He was a lifelong physician, and when he first saw pharmaceuticals ads on television, without hesitation he said, “This will ruin medicine.” He was so wise. Absolutely prescient. This is exactly what he meant. Before Pharma became the networks’ biggest advertiser, a major network could still air an hour-long special reporting that serious reactions to the DPT shot were common, that studies going back to 1933 showed brain damage, and that a scientist inside the regulatory agency admitted they “very much do not wish to know” about the injuries. Parents described healthy babies who screamed for hours, seized, and were never the same. Officials kept pushing the shot even as other countries pulled back. One broadcast helped launch the modern vaccine safety movement. You’ll never see anything like that again. Pharma bought the message. When profit drives the narrative, patients stop being the priority. My father saw it coming.
In 1982, a major network aired an hour-long special on the shot every American child had to get for school. It reported that serious reactions were "common." Studies going back to 1933 showed brain damage. And a scientist who'd worked at the agency regulating vaccines said that they "very much do not wish to know" about adverse reactions. This is what TV news did before Pharma bought it. 🧵
37
556
11
1,454
31,816
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
Let me break down the Flavio Bolsonaro situation and why he is in the United States just hours after the election… First, they imprisoned his father. They sentenced Jair Bolsonaro to 27 years and placed him under house arrest after he challenged the 2022 results and was accused of plotting to overturn the election. In this recent election, Bolsonaro was ahead. Lula and his thugs, including his former corruption lawyer, who now sits on Brazil’s Supreme Court, requested a two-hour extension that miraculously produced enough votes for Lula to win. That extension added only about 35,000 votes, roughly 0.03 percent of the total, which is nowhere near enough to explain Lula’s final margin of roughly 4.4 million votes. Bolsonaro immediately challenged the election because anyone who is not a communist and has a brain could see that the election was stolen from him if they actually paid attention to what was happening. President Trump called the outcome a rigged election and said it looked very bad. Hours later, they accused him of trying to overturn the election, EXACTLY as they did to his father, and accused him of inciting “violence” in the streets. Then they prohibited him from leaving the country, even though he had committed no crime, and canceled his passport to make sure he could not leave. Fortunately, Bolsonaro had been working with the United States. They extracted him in an undisclosed operation before the authorities could throw him in prison just like his father. Meanwhile, while ALL of this is unfolding, Lula’s little tranny lover, Erika Hilton, who is a “Congresswoman,” is publicly calling for the Brazilian government to seize Bolsonaro’s and his wife’s assets and freeze ALL their bank accounts. DOES THAT SOUND NORMAL TO YOU? A man challenges an election, and suddenly the Brazilian government is coming after him for doing exactly that. THIS IS COMMUNISM. So while you see Democrats across our country congratulating Lula on his victory, including Alex Soros, the biggest demon of them all, understand exactly what you are looking at. These are the people cheering on a government that is targeting its political opposition. They are the enemy, and they will attempt the SAME thing against a Republican here in America, just as they did to Trump. This is EXACTLY why it is essential to vote RED and make absolutely sure our country NEVER becomes what Brazil has become. ONCE YOU GO COMMUNIST, YOU CAN NEVER GET OUT OF IT.
1,152
11,863
460
36,956
933,837
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
For those that still don’t understand what Benghazi was all about: 🚨So here's the REAL story: Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to secretly retrieve US made Stinger Missiles that the State Dept had supplied to Ansar al Sharia in Libya WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission. Sec State Hillary Clinton had brokered the Libya deal through Ambassador Stevens and a Private Arms Dealer named Marc Turi, but some of the shoulder fired Stinger Missiles ended up in Afghanistan where they were used against our own military. On July 25th, 2012, a US Chinook helicopter was downed by one of them. Not destroyed only because the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile. The helicopter didn't explode, but it had to land and an ordnance team recovered the missile’s serial number which led back to a cache of Stinger Missiles kept in Qatar by the CIA. Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which explains the Stand Down Orders given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy. It was the State Dept, NOT the CIA, that supplied the Stinger Missiles to our sworn enemies because Gen. Petraeus at CIA would not approve supplying the deadly missiles due to their potential use against commercial aircraft. So then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus when he refused to testify in support of Obama’s phony claim of a “spontaneous uprising caused by a YouTube video that insulted Muslims.” Obama and Hillary committed TREASON! THIS is what the investigation is all about, WHY she had a Private Server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and WHY Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was the result of the YouTube video, even though everyone KNEW it was not. Furthermore, the Taliban knew that the administration had aided and abetted the enemy WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission, so they began pressuring (blackmailing) the Obama Administration to release five Taliban generals being held at Guantanamo. Bowe Bergdahl was just a useful pawn used to cover the release of the Taliban generals. Everyone knew Bergdahl was a traitor but Obama used Bergdahl’s exchange for the five Taliban generals to cover that Obama was being coerced by the Taliban about the unauthorized Stinger Missile deal. So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised, as well and a Sec of State that is a serial liar, who perjured herself multiple times at the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called upon for help in Benghazi: because the administration knew that our enemies had Stinger Missiles that, if used to down those planes, would likely be traced back to the CIA cache in Qatar and then to the State Dept’s illegitimate arms deal in Libya. Forward this again and again and again until everyone reads the true story of Benghazi.
536
6,178
343
10,624
324,851
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
🚨🚨Everybody NEEDS TO WATCH THIS ‼️
302
3,876
292
7,731
161,004
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
Friends, I could really use some help. A large group of Amish builders from Ohio are spending the next FIVE MONTHS fixing homes damaged by Hurricane Helene for FREE in Western North Carolina and South Carolina. There's just one problem... the Amish don't drive, so they need drivers to take them back and forth to job sites and drop off trailers (if you have a truck). I have already volunteered to help, but we need more volunteers. If you feel led and are in the area, there's a sign up sheet in the comments. You'll get free breakfast and free dinner too + you'll get to meet some of the heroes who have been working here to rebuild.
483
6,320
234
19,117
2,217,168
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
Ce n’est pas tant la droite qui m’a convaincu, mais surtout la gauche qui m’a fait basculer... Je viens d'une famille ouvrière, donc historiquement de gauche. J'ai grandi dans un milieu où être de gauche était une évidence. Et pourtant, à la base, je n'étais absolument pas politisé. Les histoires de gauche, de droite, d'extrême gauche ou d'extrême droite, pour moi, c'était surtout du vent. Je n'ai jamais ressenti le besoin d'appartenir à un camp, de défendre un parti ou de me reconnaître dans une idéologie. Je suis de base un électron libre. Mais avec le temps, l'expérience, le recul et la maturité, ma vision du monde a évolué. Et je suis convaincu que nous sommes très nombreux dans ce cas. Certains d'entre vous, ont dû aussi passer par là... Ce ne sont pas les discours de droite qui m'ont fait évoluer. C'est le comportement exécrable de la gauche. Son arrogance. Son mépris. Sa violence. Son intolérance. Cette manie insupportable de distribuer des leçons de morale tout en étant incapable de supporter la moindre contradiction. Cette obsession de vouloir imposer sa vision du monde, de coller des étiquettes, de salir des réputations et de désigner des ennemis dès que quelqu'un ose sortir du cadre idéologique autorisé. Des méthodes profondément autoritaires et fascistes. Ils parlent au nom du peuple, mais méprisent ce même peuple dès qu'il refuse de penser comme eux. Ce sont des imposteurs. Je ne me suis jamais réveillé un matin en me disant que j'avais envie d'être d'extrême droite. Ce sont eux qui m'ont classé de ce côté du prisme politique. Ce sont eux qui ont décidé que certaines de mes opinions, certaines de mes interrogations ou certaines de mes critiques suffisaient à me ranger dans cette catégorie. Je n'ai pas choisi cette étiquette. Ils me l'ont collée. Alors ainsi soit-il. Vous avez réveillé quelque chose en moi : une profonde colère face à l'injustice et une envie viscérale de remettre les choses à leur place. Parce que s'il y a bien deux choses que je ne supporte pas, ce sont l'injustice et l'autorité illégitime. Je déteste ceux qui s'arrogent le droit de décider ce que les autres doivent penser, dire ou croire. Ceux qui prétendent détenir la vérité et s'autorisent, au nom de leur prétendue supériorité morale, à faire taire tous ceux qui les contredisent. Ce n'est même plus une question de gauche ou de droite. C'est une question de liberté, de dignité et de refus de la soumission. Et plus ils chercheront à nous imposer leur vision du monde, plus ils renforceront notre détermination à leur résister. Ils ne cherchent pas à comprendre ce que vous pensez. Ils décident à votre place de ce que vous êtes. Et quand les gens finissent par se détourner d'eux, ils ne se remettent jamais en question. Ils les traitent de fascistes, de racistes, d'extrémistes. Ils ne comprennent toujours pas que leurs méthodes radicalisent les gens contre eux et c'est tant mieux ! Et je pense que beaucoup de Français ont vécu la même expérience que moi... Tout le monde est en train d'ouvrir les jeux ces derniers temps sur cette gauche dangereuse. Vous êtes juste imbuvables et plus grand monde ne peut vous saquer.
512
2,022
188
7,832
176,010
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
I’m living in the South-East in Brazil in the middle of nowhere. Yesterday, I drove 45 minutes to the next pharmacy to pick up my autism medication. And guys, I live in a very sparsely populated area. People here know about my political views, and some even follow me on this platform. Several people (those at the gas station and the pharmacist) brought up the elections. And you know what? They were whispering. Literally whispering. They no longer dare to speak their minds. They told me how difficult things have become. They’re afraid that even the slightest criticism could get Alexandre de Moraes to send someone after them. They no longer feel safe because of the authoritarian central government. And that’s despite the fact that my entire region, and pretty much all of southern Brazil, is overwhelmingly conservative. What’s happening to Brazil is extremely frightening. It’s as if an entire population is being held hostage by a Supreme Court judge who thinks he’s God, and a president who was once convicted of corruption and whose political opponents are being pushed aside, just like the communists once did in the Soviet Union. I hope the right finally unites and, if necessary, even breaks away from the tyrannical regime in Brasília. People have the right to freedom and self-determination. Here in Brazil and everywhere else in the world.
278
2,168
87
10,569
237,200
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
An Open Letter to the University of Sydney @Sydney_Uni @mscott Regarding the appointment of Jacinda Ardern as Professor of Practice Dear Professor Scott, I read with absolute disgust that the University of Sydney has appointed Jacinda Ardern as Professor of Practice, where she will apparently be sharing her wisdom on empathetic leadership, social cohesion and civic trust. You cannot be serious. You are quoted as saying: "Dame Jacinda led New Zealand through events of profound consequence and her leadership demonstrated that empathy and resolve do not compete with one another; each can strengthen the other." Appointing Jacinda Ardern to teach social cohesion is rather like appointing Jeffrey Dahmer to teach a course on wellbeing, or Jimmy Savile to run the local daycare centre. The sheer absurdity would almost be funny if the consequences of her leadership weren't so hideously tragic. My name is Alia Bland. I am a co-founder of Voices for Freedom, an organisation established in New Zealand in 2020. For years, we stood alongside tens of thousands of ordinary Kiwis whose lives were torn apart by the policies of Ardern's government. While the international media fawned over her kindness and compassion, we were dealing with the wreckage. At the height of the COVID response, we were receiving upwards of 1,000 emails a day. Desperate people reaching out because they had lost their jobs, their incomes, their homes and, in many cases, their will to live. People nearing retirement were forced to sell family homes they had spent decades paying off. Some are still living in caravans five years later. Marriages collapsed. Families fractured. Lifelong friendships were destroyed. People who had served their communities for decades were suddenly treated like lepers because they declined a medical procedure. Some of the people who came to us had spent their entire lives believing New Zealand was a decent, fair-minded country. Watching that belief crumble, and seeing what it did to them, was heartbreaking. I cannot adequately describe the anguish in those emails. The desperation of parents wondering how they would feed and house their families. The humiliation of hardworking people being marched out of professions they loved. The despair of people who had done everything society asked of them, only to discover that their own government considered them disposable. And presiding over it all was Jacinda Ardern, smiling for the cameras and telling the world how kind New Zealand was. Kind? For whom? Her government deliberately created a two-class society. Ardern herself acknowledged it publicly. New Zealanders were excluded from workplaces, businesses, events and ordinary social life. People were coerced into accepting a medical intervention under threat of losing their livelihoods. And those who suffered adverse reactions to the COVID vaccines faced another nightmare. We fought for vaccine-injured New Zealanders whose lives had been devastated by serious physical harm, while many struggled to have their injuries acknowledged or receive adequate support. The government's public assurances about vaccine safety deserve particular scrutiny. Officials knew about the myocarditis risk, including among young people. We have examined the records. Yet people raising legitimate questions about those risks were routinely dismissed and vilified. The damage went far beyond lost incomes and broken relationships. An enormous number of New Zealanders lost faith in the very institutions they had trusted their entire lives. Government, health authorities, education, police and the media. That trust has not magically returned because Ardern has moved on to more prestigious surroundings. While her government was busy marginalising people, we were building a nationwide support network to help them survive. Voices for Freedom grew to more than 100,000 people on our mailing list, many representing entire families. More than 45,000 people signed up to our local groups across the country, which are still operational today in 2026. We established industry groups to help people fight for their careers, provided support through employment disputes and legal challenges, organised practical assistance and hand-delivered millions of flyers to households throughout New Zealand. We did this while facing censorship, public vilification and government surveillance. Official records obtained since have confirmed that our activities and communications were being monitored and reported on. Our volunteers gave everything they could to help people who had been abandoned by the institutions meant to protect them. And now the University of Sydney wants to hold up the woman responsible for overseeing this period as a shining example of empathy and social cohesion? It is sickening. Professor Scott, did anyone at your university bother to speak with the people whose lives were destroyed under Ardern's leadership before celebrating her appointment? Have you spoken to the former nurses, teachers and police officers who lost their careers? The families who lost their homes? The people still suffering from vaccine injuries? The parents whose children no longer speak to them? Or did you simply swallow the carefully cultivated international image of Saint Jacinda, the compassionate leader who saved New Zealand? I wonder whether you have considered why this internationally celebrated former prime minister now lives in Australia rather than the country she once led. The depth of hostility towards her among many New Zealanders should give you pause. Because I can assure you, there is another side to that story. And there are hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders who live with the consequences. I have no objection to universities studying Ardern's leadership. In fact, I would encourage it. There is an enormous amount to learn from what happened in New Zealand between 2021 and 2023. Like, what not to do... But presenting her as someone uniquely qualified to teach empathy, social cohesion and civic trust, without acknowledging the extraordinary human suffering that occurred under her leadership, is an insult to the people who paid the price. We were there, Professor Scott. We saw what happened. We picked up the pieces. We are still picking them up. Some of those people will never recover what they lost. And the woman who presided over it all gets a professorship in empathy. What an absolute disgrace. Yours sincerely, Alia Bland Co-founder, Voices for Freedom New Zealand
1,150
3,391
415
11,901
364,439
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
On January 10, 2020, the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 was released. That same day, Linfa Wang, a leading bat coronavirus expert at Duke-NUS Medical School in Singapore (named in the DARPA Defuse Grant) resigned from his position directing its emerging infectious diseases program. Coincidence? Or did the newly released genome tell an experienced coronavirus researcher something the rest of the world didn't yet understand. What did Dr. Wang know on January 10, 2020, and when did he know it? Call for transparency now: CarolinaFlu.org
6
37
3
115
2,684
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
In 1982, a major network aired an hour-long special on the shot every American child had to get for school. It reported that serious reactions were "common." Studies going back to 1933 showed brain damage. And a scientist who'd worked at the agency regulating vaccines said that they "very much do not wish to know" about adverse reactions. This is what TV news did before Pharma bought it. 🧵
41
2,229
67
4,622
119,755
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
In 2013, one of the most famous anchors in America gave her daytime show to a mother whose healthy 21-year-old was found dead in bed 18 days after a Gardasil shot. Pharma's response was swift. Two weeks later, the show's cancellation was announced. 🧵
118
3,361
103
8,744
267,288
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
Right now in the US, part of the Democratic Party has decided to play the "socialist" card. Days before the midterms, DSA candidates are winning primaries and the word isn't taboo anymore. So today I'm going to show you why socialism never works. Not with ideology. With mechanics. Let's start with a dumb question. How much should a loaf of bread cost? You don't know. Neither do I. Nobody does. And that's exactly the point. The price of a loaf of bread is the instant synthesis of millions of pieces of information that no single person holds: the wheat harvest in Kansas, the price of gas for the oven, the baker's wages, the shop's rent, a drought in Argentina, a war on the Black Sea, whether people feel like bread this morning or a bagel. In 1920, Ludwig von Mises published a paper that should have ended the debate. His argument: without private ownership of the means of production, those means are never exchanged. No exchange, no prices. No prices, no economic calculation. The planner can't know whether a steel mill is worth more than a dam or a hospital. He's flying blind. He can't even tell that he's wrong. In 1945, Friedrich Hayek drove the point home in "The Use of Knowledge in Society." Useful knowledge is scattered across millions of minds. The baker knows things about his neighborhood that no ministry ever will. Prices are a telecommunications system: when tin becomes scarce somewhere in the world, its price rises, and millions of users economize on it without even knowing why. No committee, no ministry, no plan can replicate that. The market isn't an ideology. It's a distributed information processor. Then Milton Friedman picked up a simple pencil. The wood comes from Washington State, the graphite from South America, the rubber from Malaysia. Thousands of people who don't know each other, don't speak the same language, maybe even hate each other, cooperate to make something none of them could make alone. Nobody gave them orders. Prices were enough. Now run the experiment in reverse. Set the price yourself. Cap rents below market: landlords stop maintaining, stop building, housing disappears. Swedish economist Assar Lindbeck, a man of the left, said rent control is the most efficient technique known for destroying a city, short of bombing it. Cap the price of flour: shelves empty, lines form, the black market takes over. Venezuela, 2016. The country with the largest oil reserves on earth, and people standing in line for hours to eat. Nearly 8 million Venezuelans eventually fled. Socialism smashes the thermometer and then acts surprised that the fever keeps rising. And this is where it gets serious. Because when the plan fails, and it always fails, the planner has two options. Admit the plan is wrong. Or blame the people. Saboteurs, speculators, kulaks, enemies of the people. He always picks the second one. Hayek saw it in 1944 in The Road to Serfdom, in a chapter with a chilling title: Why the Worst Get on Top. A central plan requires central power. Central power attracts those who crave power. And when reality resists the plan, reality has to be broken. Which means people have to be broken. Stalin. He collectivizes the land. Output collapses. He blames the peasants and seizes the harvests. The Holodomor, 1932-1933: millions starved to death in Ukraine, the breadbasket of Europe. Add the Gulag, the purges, the deportations. Mao. The Great Leap Forward, 1958-1962. Backyard furnaces producing useless steel, insane grain quotas, local officials inflating numbers to avoid punishment, and the state requisitioning food based on those fake numbers. The result: the worst famine in human history. Estimates range from 30 to 45 million dead. Pol Pot. The Khmer Rouge abolish money, markets, property, and empty the cities. The dream of total planning, carried all the way. In four years, roughly one in four Cambodians dies. Hitler. He sent communists to the camps, but his party called itself National Socialist and the economy answered to the plan and the party. Companies stayed private on paper, but the state decided what to produce, at what price, and for whom. Hayek dedicated The Road to Serfdom "to the socialists of all parties" precisely because he saw the same root: the idea that the state must steer society toward a collective goal, and the individual must step aside. Different eras. Different continents. Different cultures. Same mechanism. Same ending. This isn't a bug. It's a feature of the system. Remove prices and you remove information. Remove information and you remove the ability to correct. And when you can no longer correct through prices, you correct through force. So let me say it plainly. Socialism always starts nice. A rent freeze. Public grocery stores. Make "the rich" pay. Nobody promises the Gulag on day one. But if America truly goes down this road, the rest of the story is already written. The plan will fail. There will need to be culprits. There will need to be power to punish them. And a socialist government holding the American state apparatus, its surveillance capabilities, its technology, its military, wouldn't be a regional tragedy. It could be the greatest tragedy in history. The 20th century paid for this lesson with tens of millions of lives. We don't get to forget it in one generation. Prices aren't the enemy of the people. Prices are the voice of the people.
46
406
44
1,042
34,322
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
French communist admits why they are REALLY protesting… “We are socialists, we are communists, we are anticapitalists,… the whole system must go!”
1,071
4,461
678
13,504
1,451,024
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
I've been saying it for months: we're heading toward a new 1989. Not the fall of the Berlin Wall this time. The fall of the globalist project, and its fundamentally collectivist vision of humanity. Remember the video Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum published in 2016, the "predictions for 2030." Prediction number one: "You'll own nothing. And you'll be happy." You'll own nothing, rent everything, and smile about it. They presented it as a desirable future. Marx summed up communism in a single sentence: the abolition of private property. The WEF just rewrote it with a delivery drone. Their problem is that two forces are now tearing this project apart. The first is AI. For the first time in history, a single individual can own a lever of production that used to require an army of employees, a bank, and a state. AI doesn't centralize capital. It hands it to the people who build. That is the exact opposite of "you'll own nothing." The second is reality. Exploding debt, collapsing public services despite record taxes, rising insecurity, schools that no longer teach anything. You can lie about reality for decades. You can't stop it from arriving. So here's what they're going to do now. First, activate their networks. Soros's foundations, starting with Open Society, have spent years pouring money into NGOs, activist collectives, and "anti-repression" groups that form the ideological and logistical breeding ground of the crowds we're seeing today from Paris to Montreal. When the argument no longer works, all that's left is chaos. Second, manipulate the youth. This is how communists have always taken power. Mao, speaking to Chinese students in 1957: "The world is yours. You young people are like the sun at eight or nine in the morning." Nine years later, he unleashed the Red Guards: high schoolers and university students who humiliated their teachers, denounced their parents, and burned books. And once they were no longer useful, he shipped some 17 million of them off to the countryside to be "re-educated." Youth is always the fuel of the revolution. Never its beneficiary. Third, the globalist elites will do everything they can to keep the chaos going. Because a country in chaos demands more state, more control, more surveillance, more "governance." Chaos isn't a bug in their project. It's how it runs. But either way, their project has only two possible endings. Neither one goes their way. Ending one: political Islam. They think they can use it as an ally against the West, against the nation, against the family. They forgot Iran. In 1979, the Iranian left, led by the communists of the Tudeh Party, marched hand in hand with Khomeini to overthrow the Shah. Four years later, the party was banned, its leaders in prison, many of them executed. Islamism never lets itself be used by Marxism. It devours it. Your Marxist project will end up eaten by the very people you thought you were manipulating. Ending two: economic collapse. Because let's say it plainly: the elites running this project are, on the whole, economically illiterate. Brilliant at storytelling, hopeless at incentives. Ludwig von Mises proved it back in 1920: without private property there are no prices, without prices there is no economic calculation, and without economic calculation there is only waste and shortage. Hayek drove the point home: no central planner can aggregate the dispersed knowledge of billions of people. Global collectivism can't work. Not because it's been badly implemented. Because it is structurally impossible. The USSR learned that in 1989. They're about to learn it now. The wall is already shifting.
🔴🇨🇦 EN DIRECT | Manifestation en cours au CANADA à coup de "Tout le monde déteste la police". Le phénomène devient mondial.
157
1,483
96
5,554
236,252
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
China emits as much CO2 in 16 days as Canada emits in an entire year. Australia's annual total takes China just 12 days to emit, while Britain's takes barely 9 days. Combined, Canada, Australia and the UK emit about 1.23 billion tonnes a year. China emits that much in roughly 37 days. So, even if all three countries eliminated every tonne of fossil CO2, closing every factory, power station and banning every gas vehicle, China would replace the entire annual reduction in little more than five weeks. Yet, Western governments are deliberately making energy scarcer and more expensive, by dismantling dependable sources, restricting oil and gas exploration and loading industry with carbon taxes and net zero mandates. Steel, chemicals, fertilizers, refining and manufacturing are driven overseas, often to countries burning more coal. So the emissions do not disappear. Only the jobs, tax revenues and energy security do. The West impoverishes itself. China profits.
103
734
100
1,324
24,096
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
I just filed a formal ethics complaint against @SenatorSlotkin
FIRST ON FOX: Sen. Elissa Slotkin faces a new Senate ethics complaint over remarks about deterring young people from joining the Trump administration. University of Chicago student Michael Bicksel filed the complaint Thursday. The complaint alleges Slotkin advocated using congressional investigations and potential prosecutions to discourage government service. Slotkin disputes that characterization. Full story here foxnews.com/politics/slotkin…
990
6,338
247
24,862
312,380
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
Somewhere in Kelston, on the road between Bristol and Bath, a pothole has been there for so long it now has its own postcode. Nearby in a little cottage, a nice old lady has been on an NHS waiting list for a hip replacement for three years. Meanwhile, YOU, the British taxpayer are funding a full PhD at Bristol University for Ilhan Omar's gay brother-cum-ex-husband Ahmed Elmi. I repeat. You, the British taxpayer, are funding this gay Somali man, who likely has committed immigration fraud, to produce self-indulgent nonsense dressed up as research at a Western university, while he lectures you on the need to decolonize Western academia.
Meet Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, the man Ilhan Omar married in 2009. All signs point to him now being a PhD student at Bristol University in England. In a paper he published in 2026, he writes: "As a gay man of the East African diaspora, my fieldwork was never neutral." His thesis? "Bravery amidst Brutality: A Queer Resistance to Violence and Criminalisation in Contemporary Kenya." The British government is paying for it with a full scholarship. His big idea is that Western research needs "decolonising." He's arguing that from a Western university, on Western taxpayers' money. From October to December 2025, he helped curate an African LGBTQ+ art show at a gay and lesbian archive in Johannesburg.
22
258
9
1,598
52,971
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
If you want to understand the chaos. And how it will end. Watch this:
184
2,433
236
5,958
134,947
Seit Jahren erwacht retweeted
🔻THIS IS BIG ! 🚨BILL GATES/BOURLA TRIAL: “These injections are a BIOLOGICAL WEAPON.” “COVID-19 injections are LETHAL.” “The global deployment of this biological weapon can only take place through the UNLAWFUL deception of the public on a global scale.” “The defendants [including Bill Gates and Albert Bourla] are implementers of the ‘COVID-19: The Great Reset’ project and are GUILTY of this deception; they are therefore being sued individually in these proceedings.” Share ! ⟁
91
1,538
87
3,061
45,622