Insomnus (@nighttimemedia) profile picture

American. Computer scientist. Terminal insomniac. Author of "Getting Screwed: A Layman's Guide to Political Strategy".

Joined February 2022
Photo by Insomnus (@nighttimemedia)Photo by Insomnus (@nighttimemedia)Photo by Insomnus (@nighttimemedia)Photo by Insomnus (@nighttimemedia)Photo by Insomnus (@nighttimemedia)Photo by Insomnus (@nighttimemedia)Photo by Insomnus (@nighttimemedia)Photo by Insomnus (@nighttimemedia)Photo by Insomnus (@nighttimemedia)Photo by Insomnus (@nighttimemedia)
Speaking as a computer scientist... Note also that the numbers you referenced aren't all just 64-35, they're all 64.6 + or - 0.2, and 35.4 + or - 0.2. That's even more unlikely. This is what happens when you don't pay attention in math class. Likely some corrupt programmer put in a random factor that he thought would alter the numbers, without making it look like it altered the numbers. Like (brain-dead example) "If this ballot was for the opponent, and the random number generator is greater than 0.6, then change it.". But he didn't bother to do the math, or he would have realized that if you use whatever that random element is, over enough cases, then the result converges on 64.6 and 35.4. At least if I was going to vet the program that did this, then that's what I'd most expect to find. This is a typical undergrad mistake. Just because your algorithm has a randomizing element, that doesn't mean that the result isn't going to converge, over a large enough number of trials. Also note that this kind of manipulation almost always leaves a footprint in the data. Statisticians who specialize in analyzing voting results know what properties honest results should have. Unless the corrupt programmer really knew what he was doing, they'll spot the strange results, and the nature of the strangeness will give them a strong clue as to what the programmer did.
HOLY CR*P 🚨 How is this even possible?? All of California’s major candidate election results are the EXACT SAME percentages for Democrats and Republicans Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Lieutenant Governor 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Secretary of State 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Controller 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Treasurer 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Attorney General 64% (D) vs 35% (R) Supreme Court Justice: Joshua Groban 72% (D) vs 28% (R) Supreme Court Justice: Kelli M. Evans 72% (D) vs 28% (R) These don’t look like real election results, they look like a computer algorithm Our elections are fake
293
3,753
222
9,956
153,237
Question: How do you think that the English media, police, and others, would react, if there was a huge number of conservative white males raping underage Muslim immigrant girls across England, for decades?
9
20
376
Exactly. This is not a possible result. If nothing is done to invalidate it, then America is very likely over. 1. This can't be hidden. Citizens will know. 2. This will confirm that Democrats will openly cheat, every time, to enough of an extreme to invalidate even the idea of elections in America. 3. This will confirm that Republicans will do nothing about it. 4. Putting all of this together, it means that American voters no longer have any control over their government. Democrats could slaughter, and cannibalize, a thousand cute orphans, on the White House lawn, and in the next election enough tens of millions of votes would appear, from nowhere, to make sure that they keep control of the entire government anyway. 5. This will demonstrate that American citizens are now in a "nothing to lose" scenario, against their own government. I can't see anything good coming from that.
2,848 counties flip to Democrats out of a total of 3,109 counties? This is the most obvious ELECTION FRAUD in history, even challenging the stolen 2020 election. We can't go on like this. I'm tired of people destroying this country and getting away with everything.
1
17
2
45
460
I have processed the following states examining the vote anomalies I have been posting about today. I decided to put them into an excel spreadsheet that anyone can examine and use as you wish. It includes a sheet for the states: Texas, North Carolina,Iowa,South Carolina, Kansas,Mississippi, Maine, and Ohio, all states which saw a senate flip from D to R. All but Maine show the anomaly. Maine is, after all, Maine, and a good theory isn't a good theory if you don't run into the occasional outlier. I did not include Alaska yet as they are still playing with the Ranked Choice Voting and god only knows how that will look, data wise. I included Florida because we didn't lose that seat, and it looks "normal" (not in the closeness of the race, but the voter's choices line up properly with what we expect). I included New York as it was a safe state for the Dems and there was no need to do much tinkering. (Their insane voter rolls takes care of that). And the vote order indeed looks like what we would expect. I included Colorado because even though it should have been considered a safe seat for the Dems, the data shows the anomaly in republican votes anyway. Things that make you go "hmmm". Seeing this pattern in one or two states would just be mildly interesting. But like with my "Mesa Pattern", which identified coordinated nationwide fraud in 2020, the more "hits" you get, the less likely the benign explanation. Here is the link: votedatabase.com/2026/votean… God bless. Wow I'm tired :-)
186
906
65
2,492
80,067
As I've posted before, a huge amount of the blame for the West's political problems goes to local police, following orders from evil people above them in the food chain. What would have happened in England if, from the very beginning, the police had refused to let the Islamists get away with rape, and made a public pronouncement that they would never behave otherwise? What if they had refused to arrest people for writing "offensive" things on social media, and made a public pronouncement that they would never behave otherwise? Without the police, or other enforcement groups, backing them up, tyrants are largely impotent. At the very least, we need to so arrange our politics so that police, like sheriffs, are sworn to be loyal to the Constitution over the local government.
This is not my theory. This is theirs. Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan — the two most cited scholars in the color revolution field — studied 323 regime change campaigns. Their finding: Security force defections make campaigns FORTY-SIX TIMES more likely to succeed.
7
17
395
Insomnus retweeted
A wolf has a stomach at pH 1, a short simple gut and no fermentation chamber anywhere in it. It eats meat. A lion has an intestine about 4 times its body length, where a grazer runs 20, and sleeps 20 hours a day between kills. It eats meat. A cat cannot make its own taurine and cannot turn carotene into vitamin A. Denied animal tissue it goes blind and its heart gives out. It eats meat. A crocodile has the strongest stomach acid ever measured in a vertebrate, strong enough to take bone and horn apart. It eats meat. A ferret moves food from mouth to exit in about 3 hours. There is no time in that gut to ferment anything. It eats meat. An eagle has forward-facing eyes, a hooked beak, talons, and coughs up the parts it cannot dissolve. It eats meat. A polar bear stores so much vitamin A in its liver that one meal of it would poison a man. It eats meat. Not one of them was ever told. The body was the instruction. The human has stomach acid at pH 1.5, as strong as animals that eat things they find already dead. A small intestine running two thirds of the gut and a colon under a quarter, the carnivore's proportion, upside down from every leaf-eater alive. No cellulase. No rumen. A caecum so useless we take it out when it complains. B12 in no plant on earth. Haem iron absorbed at 25 to 35%, against 2 to 10 for the plant kind. Forward-facing eyes. A shoulder built to throw. Skin that sweats, so we can run something faster than us into the ground by mid-afternoon. Our tapeworms split from the ones in lions and hyenas 1.7 million years ago, because we were standing at the same carcass. Stone tools were stripping meat off bone 2.6 million years back. Same acid. Same gut. Same eyes. The only animal on earth that can read its own biology is the only one arguing with it.
262
1,872
83
14,553
885,000
👇👇👇
40
1,446
26
7,086
52,336
Insomnus retweeted
So many people pushing the BS that this election was about a war where there was no fighting on the ground & barely any air strikes yet we could go to war in Afghanistan for more than 20 years wit barely a peep out of the public? C’mon. People may not be thrilled about this but it is not even close to enough to turn red strongholds across the country blue. Give me a break. And right on cue, the right is doing exactly what those behind these ridiculous results wanted them to do: blaming the President so he can be isolated & the Republicans can justify turning on him & voting with Democrats to impeach & then imprison him & go after every member of his family & take every single thing he has. And while they are doing that, they will be preparing to go after every single person who supported him in any way. So maybe people should stop playing into their hands by just blaming the President instead of blaming the people who stole the election. They will attack me for saying that but I don’t care because it is true. joehoft.com/did-america-real…
730
2,462
153
6,837
66,762
HOLY CR*P 🚨 North Carolina processed 1,410,905 new valid voter registrations between 2022-2024 without proof of citizenship Democrats just flipped control of North Carolina for the first time since 2010 with many races decided by under 300 votes. Democrats also won every statewide race on the ballot Again, they did this after processing 1,410,905 new valid voter registrations without proof of citizenship - This is from the Official Election Administration and Voting Comprehensive Report buried on page 192
890
8,695
510
17,039
328,007
Speaking as a computer scientist, this situation is absurd. There's a trivial, bulletproof method to avoid this problem, and to fix it now, although it might, sadly, require a little bit of new equipment be bought. You see, I grew up before the internet existed, and (wait for it, this is crazy), grocery stores had freezers then. They had these things called "thermostats", with "dials", and you turned the dial to tell the thermostat what temperature to keep the freezers at. The thermostats didn't connect to the (nonexistent) internet at all, and all the hardware and software (even for the computerized thermostats!) was local, so they didn't need the internet to run! Weird, right? Global companies not only didn't need to control their thermostats remotely, but they also didn't need to monitor them remotely, because they had this person at each store called a "manager", and this thing called a "telephone" that they could use to call him if they wanted to know something. They could even require that he call them if there was a problem, so that they didn't have to call around all the time. And it worked! So here's my totally crazy solution. First, grocery stores get hardware, if they don't already, that lets them control the freezers without connections to the internet. Then, they remove all connections to the internet. Then, they (wait for it, it's insane) turn the dials themselves! And it's hack proof, because (wait for it again), there's no connection to the outside world to hack it through!!! Crazy, right? And today, that hardware would probably cost far less than the "modern" stuff does. So how about grocery stores just install this "hack proof" hardware, that doesn't have the ability to connect to anything else, and a little local data logger to record if there's a temperature fluctuation at night when nobody's there to see it, that this "manager" could check in person, and make this problem go away forever? If nobody wants to supply this, then perhaps I could find some angel investors to help me start a company that would supply the new hack-proof thermostats. Of course, since it's guaranteed hack-proof, I'll have to price it at several times what the vulnerable stuff costs today (plastic dials don't come cheap you know!). But I'm sure that we could come to some arrangement. For my next trick, I'll tell you how to make home appliances that can't be hacked. You see, they used to have these things called "on-off switches"...
Hackers just wiped out $1.5 billion in food by remotely heating European supermarket freezers overnight. This week, they moved on to blood banks. If they are willing to target the food on your grocery shelves and the blood banks, what happens when they go after the rest of the infrastructure? I’ve been tracking warnings like these for weeks, but today I had to pull out the chalkboard to put the full picture together. THIS is why governments across the globe are telling you to prepare.
1
5
16
174
This is going to become a big problem. Statistical analyses are beginning to come in, showing that the odds of such an overwhelming "blue wave" are literally trillions to one against. If the Republicans do nothing, or if they do something, but it doesn't work, then their supporters will lose all faith in them. It will be seen as proof that, from now on, Republicans will lose everything, to the most blatant cheating imaginable. If they do something and it does work, then millions of Democrats will refuse to believe that there was any cheating, no matter what, and there will likely be riots all over America. We seem to be entering a loose-loose situation.
Yeah, here in MaRICOpa County, Independents would have had to vote 82% for Democrats. But as I laid out in my article, the highest Independents have ever swung for one party over years of history is 58%. The fraud is so massive it makes 2020 look like nothing. arizonainsiders.com/2026/11/…
132
379
16
1,273
67,118
As memes go, this is particularly powerful.
842
20,368
742
68,278
670,299
In short, this isn't a normal pattern in the data. It strongly suggests that Republican votes for the more powerful offices were disappeared, or altered into votes for Democrat candidates. This is yet more evidence that in America, elections no longer matter, and Americans no longer have any control over our own government. The question is, "Where do we go from here?". I've posted these questions many times before, always unanswered, and will again: 1. What methods are available to us, under the Constitution, to remedy this? 2. Which of the methods from question 1 are feasible, meaning that American citizens can successfully implement them against the active opposition of a government that has already: a) openly defied the Constitution, and b) betrayed the American people by implementing literal demographic replacement on them, and c) shown a willingness to genocide its own population, via the imposition of toxic gene therapy injections Give me the plan that will overcome that. Because no remedy that is acceptable to the Constitution means anything unless it can also be implemented against this kind of active opposition. What will you do when you ratify a new Constitution, and the government just says "no"? Does your entire plan depend on "The military will side with us!"? 3. If the entire plan rests on "The military will side with us!", then will you make a public statement to that effect now? 4. If there is no feasible path to success under the Constitution, then you will make a public statement to that effect now? @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @BasedMikeLee @RandPaul @RepThomasMassie
Look at Texas. Jeff O'Donnell @FSociety_1942 sorted every statewide race by the number of Republican votes and then by Democrat votes. So Republicans top interest in the midterm election was the Appeals Courts, not the US Senate or the Governor races? And Republicans were more interested in the Land Commissioner, and the Comptroller, than who their US Senator and Governor was going to be? The Democrats were most interested in who their US Senator and Governor and Attorney General would be, but not the Republicans?? Jeff adds: "My friends in Eastern Pennsylvania will recognize this pattern well."
3
8
102
Insomnus retweeted
ALL 21 STATES. ALL 1,799 COUNTIES. EVERY SINGLE ONE SHIFTED BLUE. You can blame the Iran war. You can blame the economy. But you expect me to believe Republicans were THAT angry that every single state and county shifted blue? And before anyone says it, this isn’t about being unable to accept a loss. I can accept losing. What I can’t do is ignore something that just doesn’t pass the smell test. Sorry, but I have questions. 2020 makes me look at things way differently.
3,332
7,809
932
21,896
457,971
Stop lying. These were the first tweets from elected Democrats following the election.
Jeffries: "I haven't had a single member of the House Democratic caucus talk to me about impeachment. We've been relentlessly focused on affordability and accountability."
1,794
9,269
361
39,704
860,020
Skål 🥂
21
63
2
271
5,261
952
9,344
268
65,641
1,212,511
Insomnus retweeted
CO₂ is just one small piece in a planetary-scale jigsaw puzzle, assembling itself over millions of years. Ultimately, the world's climates are determined by the agonisingly slow tectonic dance of the continental and oceanic crustal plates. They set the long-term patterns for the shape of the continents, the seaways, future ocean circulation and cloud albedo, while solar irradiance and orbital cycles are the trigger points. Atmospheric CO₂ and global surface temperature are not locked together either, a story revealed in the geological record. Far from causing a mass collapse, past high-carbon epochs created the richest expansions of biosphere diversity in Earth’s history. During the early Paleozoic era (538 to 251 million years ago), starting with the Cambrian explosion, atmospheric CO₂ levels were often 10 to 15 times higher than today. During these evolutionary peaks, atmospheric CO₂ was not measured in hundreds of parts per million, but in the thousands. Changes did not happen over a few decades then either—they took tens of thousands of years. A modest rise in CO₂ levels going into the modern industrial era is not a sign of future runaway warming; it is a bounce-back during a far longer global decline in atmospheric CO₂. This brief pulse has stimulated global vegetation growth and leaf area expansion, verified by NASA satellite observations. Our current geological epoch—the Quaternary—sits near historical low levels for atmospheric CO₂ concentrations, a severely cold epoch that has locked the world in a 2.58-million-year ice age regime. This cold spell continues today. During the Last Glacial Maximum 26,000 to 20,000 years ago, ice sheets miles deep blanketed North America, northern Europe, and Siberia. CO₂ fell to approximately 180 ppm, flirting dangerously with the 150 ppm threshold where land plants cease photosynthetic activity. The glaciers began to melt and retreat rapidly around 20,000 to 15,000 years ago, with most ice disappearing from major landmasses by 10,000 years ago. Even then, sea levels rose by only 1.3 cm a year for around 9,000 years, an invisible pace of change. By contrast, today's CO₂ hovers around 425 ppm, rising and falling through the years with the natural rhythms of the seasons. When we look at Earth’s full story, CO₂ does not pose a danger to climate, but is an essential building block for the biological world. IMAGE: What 540 million years of geological history says: Willis Eschenbach.
20
126
10
235
4,559