pet rock (@petrock) header
pet rock (@petrock) profile picture

MEcon (het) student. Econ teacher (orth/het). GNU/Linux user. Secular. #LetsGoBlueJays

The United States of Canada
Joined November 2007
Photo by pet rock (@petrock)Photo by pet rock (@petrock)Photo by pet rock (@petrock)Photo by pet rock (@petrock)Photo by pet rock (@petrock)Photo by pet rock (@petrock)Photo by pet rock (@petrock)Photo by pet rock (@petrock)Photo by pet rock (@petrock)Photo by pet rock (@petrock)
It can't be repeated enough: Believing federal taxes are used to finance spending leads to fear-driven politics, misinformed policy, unnecessary austerity, rising inequality, economic stagnation, and poor inflation management. All based on a false household budget analogy.
10
36
3
73
6,103
"variously disparaged as" 🤔
Replying to @Williamgallus
Erm… MMT figures spend vast amounts of time attacking other schools of thought which are variously disparaged as “neoclassical”, “mainstream”, “orthodox”…etc. Your own output is full of such stuff!
1
72
Me: But Sam, those ter– Sam: Don't disparage me by calling me Sam!
32
Watching an argument over which fork to use at dinner, while the heterodox economist asks who owns the restaurant, who cooked the food, who gets to eat, and why the kitchen is on fire.
3
12
327
An important reminder: AI could pose a catastrophic threat requiring regulation, while AI companies could push self-serving regulations that entrench their power. Both can be true at the same time.
3
1
8
462
A brilliant human can't copy themselves, work at computer speed, or instantly coordinate thousands of copies. AI potentially can. The Hugging Face incident already showed AI agents pooling information and compute to become far more capable together. History is a poor analogy.
The "AI will kill us all" theory requires a belief that "intelligence" translates into power. Nerds might like to think that the smarter you are the more powerful you can become. The data of history suggest this theory of power is false.
2
121
Can attest. After 15+ years immersed in neoclassical economics, it took a couple of years learning MMT for it to really sink in. Reworking deeply ingrained mental models can take time and persistence.
Replying to @ilhandogus
‘Tis often easier to see things more clearly when one has not been exposed to years and years of nonsense that has fuddled the mind.
2
12
39
1,125
1/ As a respected heterodox economist, Richard Wolff has a lot of important and legitimate things to say. But here he fundamentally misunderstands the monetary system and bonds. A short thread on where his explanation goes wrong... teapaw.org/democracynow/status/20…
Marxist economist Richard Wolff explains what's happening in the turbulent bond market and what it has to do with the U.S.'s ballooning debt.
5
25
6
129
14,669
2/ First, banks do not have a fixed pile of money to lend either to homebuyers or the government. Banks create new deposits when they make loans. This is endogenous money. Lending depends on capital, risk, profitability and creditworthiness, not a pot of savings.
1
10
1
41
1,388
Say's Law makes a lot of sense in a barter economy. Too bad there's never been one in human history. But how convenient for the orthodoxy... start with barter and you never really have to address the money question.
4
8
2
23
1,751
Replying to @TYT
@TYT & @cenkuygur still pushing the "US borrows from China and our grandkids must pay it back" myth. The US issues the dollar. China holds dollar assets, mainly Treasuries. Future generations don't "repay" the national debt like a household loan. youtube.com/watch?v=vwTNfMf8…
12
1
23
1,043
1/ I often agree with much of @TYT’s political analysis, but @AnaKasparian's segment on Treasury yields contains serious economic errors. The bond-market story is real; her explanation of federal spending, debt and Treasuries is not. Let me explain... youtube.com/watch?v=sykq5vut…
1
2
1
5
481
2/ Kasparian says Treasury bonds exist to "finance" government spending. But bonds don't provide the US with dollars it needs to spend. Bond issuance traditionally drained reserves to support the Fed's rate target. With IORB, even that function is unnecessary.
1
1
7
156
1/ Philly Fed WP 23-02 validates MMT / Post-Keynesian claims for decades: banks create deposits via lending, reserves don't cause lending, capital matters not deposits. Yet zero MMT or Post-Keynesian economists cited. Contrast this with the BoE… doi.org/10.21799/frbp.wp.202…
3
1
1
7
496
2/ …who in 2014 at least used the term "endogenous" and cited Post-Keynesian work (Moore, Howells, Palley). Same conclusions nine years later, Philly Fed manages to attribute even less. Ideas get absorbed, credit doesn't. bankofengland.co.uk/quarterl…
6
113
This is true with every policy position often associated with MMT economists. The most prominent of those is the job guarantee. The lens allows us to see the JG as a viable option. However, though uncommon, one can use the MMT lens while holding values that reject the JG.
No, there are various opinions on that. MMT describes bond operations (and more). MMT does not "endorse", it's a lens. However, that lens leads to more policy options compared to conventional thinking, where the government is incorrectly modeled as a currency user.
1
1
157
Hockett applies a level of analytical rigor to economics that he doesn't seem to care to apply to claims about Israel and Gaza. That's about as polite and generous as I can be.
1
3
101
Student asks a brilliant question. Ross Gittins replies with pure slop: calls MMT "Modern Monetary Policy," says governments must borrow before spending, and never explains why debt and deficit targets beat inflation and resource constraints as guardrails. youtu.be/MwG5xY0TpzU?si=rtoR…
2
121
"Imports/trade deficits are bad" isn't a mainstream starting point. It's just an ideological reflex. A base-case starts with voluntary exchange, then asks what conditions make it harmful. This is MMT on trade. Base-cases are analytically useful heuristics, not "useless".
Diverse and shifting circumstances that apply to each nation are the reality of the world. 'Cost' and 'benefit' are polysemic terms with meanings that vary according to these circumstances. Cheap imported goods can be destructive to whole ways of life in some nations - Ha-Joon Chang got that right. The 'base-case' is irrelevant because 'normality' doesn't exist. The other way round is stupid, too.
1
3
1
2,974
Keynes and Minsky are bread and butter. Keynes explains why firms invest. Minsky explains how they finance that investment, and how fragility builds. Meanwhile, mainstream economics is still out here insisting saving causes investment.🤪
24
74
2
292
14,724
Nuance. Susan Borden (@darbyshiretrust) on US dollar hegemony: susanborden.substack.com/p/s…
1
1
128
"(What if the United States had) planned accordingly(?). It would have treated monetary sovereignty not as a license for consumption, but as a tool for capacity-building."
1
96
Sound advice.
And we need to stop calling them reserves. That's a neoclassical term. Call them by their name: settlement balances. That's what they do: banks use them to settle balances with other banks for payment finality.
4
149
Auctions aren't Kickstarter. Primary dealers must bid, and the BoJ is the backstop.
Exactly. If people don't want to buy your debt and the currency has collapsed because you capped yields in the past, your hands are tied and you can't just keep on capping yields indefinitely, because those no political consensus for this. That's where Japan is...
1
1
217
MMT clarification: Automatic stabilizers (taxes rising/falling with income) help keep demand from outrunning capacity. That's not "fight inflation with discretionary tax hikes". Discretionary tax hikes are blunt, slow, hard to pass, and not MMT's primary anti-inflation lever.
2
1
4
244
In other words, no MMT economist says "When there's inflation, raise taxes to fight it!" Not sure how that common mischaracterization started, but that's not MMT.
3
3
128