I curate & comment | Reform UK member | Join Free Speech Union UK | Support UK Armed Forces | Back British Farming | š©µ Brexit | āļø
UK
Joined May 2017
- Tweets146K
- Following4.6K
- Followers6.5K
- Likes236K
CPierceUK retweeted
This is utterly deranged.
Restore is run by rabid ethno-nationalists who want the state to police the ethnic composition of our society in the name of maintaining ādemographic securityā.
By contrast, Nigel Farage has spent his entire political career rejecting racial politics, arguing instead for shared culture and values.
Of course, Kemi knows this. But sheāll spin this line to take a few votes of Reform.
Reckless and dangerous
CPierceUK retweeted
My friend Charlie was murdered simply for engaging in conversation.
The left is using his death as a Halloween costume. These people are clearly mentally ill and NEED HELP!
CPierceUK retweeted
This was one of the most offensive things I've ever heard from a Labour MP (and that's saying something!) As a pub landlord, and employer, I find this attitude absolutely disgraceful from a load of career politicians who've never done a day's work in their lives! @EmmaforWycombe should hang her head in shame! I get up and go to work to pay HER wages, but she thinks I'm not a working person?!! š”
CPierceUK retweeted
PPE, political lobbying, political advisor, MP. Now Chief Sec Treasury without the faintest idea about the lives of ordinary people, bosses of their own struggling SMEs, forming the backbone of the country, working ever harder to offset this Government's mendacious ignorance.
CPierceUK retweeted
Too many Tories still think the answer to every problem can be found in a 1980s textbook.
Free market purism would leave Britain dependent on China for steel and shrug as thousands of high street jobs disappear. Meanwhile, Labour chokes businesses with higher taxes.
Being pro business should mean backing British industry, fair competition and the people who work hard to keep businesses going.
If credible buyers can keep Poundland trading, those offers deserve serious consideration. āThatās just the marketā is a pitiful response to 12,000 workers facing an uncertain Christmas.
These are peopleās livelihoods, families and communities.
CPierceUK retweeted
If whatās happening to Poundland was happening to Waitrose, Fraser and the Tory Party would be in Parliament Square with pitchforks.
They just donāt get it.
12,000 jobs are at stake. 600 stores.
I have received hundreds of messages from angry and scared workers.
And *there is an offer* on the table. Poundland doesnāt have to go under.
The Government should be doing everything it can to keep Poundland alive.
CPierceUK retweeted
šØLabour donāt think employers are working people!
Tell that to the millions of small business owners who employ people.
Labour havenāt a clue about business.
CPierceUK retweeted
The absurdity is obvious, but the real trap is legal and fiscal.
In international arbitration, a formal state apology is not symbolic contrition; it is an admission of liability. The exact moment Andy Burnham signs an official state apology in Antigua next week, CARICOMās reparations commission will use it as legal precedent to demand tens of billions in direct capital transfers.
Burnham claims he is ruling out financial reparations, while John Healey prepares debt-restructuring packages at the Treasury to foot the bill through the back door.
Britain spent 40% of its budget buying freedom across the Empire, deployed the West Africa Squadron for half a century to suppress the trade at massive cost in lives, and only finished paying that abolition loan in 2015.
We have crumbling infrastructure, record peacetime tax burdens, and public services on their knees. Yet the governing class is actively laying the legal groundwork to hand foreign states an open chequebook to satisfy student union guilt trips.
CPierceUK retweeted
Andy Burnham says, in a new Guardian opinion piece, that he is āopen toā the ācalls for a formal apology on behalf of the British stateā for the transatlantic slave trade which began almost HALF A MILLENNIUM ago.
This would be like someone in the year 2526 having to apologise for heinous acts conducted today. It is ridiculous.
It goes without saying that the transatlantic slave trade was an awful part of global history. But it is also a part of history for which we have already atoned, multiple times over, as one of the worldās pioneers in abolishing the slave trade and indeed policing, through our West Africa Squadron and others āĀ an endeavour that cost up to 2% of Britainās GDP every year for decades to come.
Now think about all the aid money we have supplied across the world since. Billions upon billions. And lest we forget the lives Britain has put on the line over the centuries since: our own people, who sacrificed everything, to keep the free world free.
This is a time of year we remember those sacrifices instead of grovelling to anyone who demands it over something of which no Briton alive played any part.
Yet Burnham is still āopenā to making humiliating public pronouncements on Britainās behalf. I say no. I say enough.
One of the biggest problems we face today is that we are no longer a forward-looking nation. We only ever seem to lament our past, or condemn those who came before us. I cannot abide it any longer. Britain is exceptional. We are a moral force in the world. We have given so much, and sacrificed for centuries.
It is now time to put the Britsh people first, instead of caving to every demand that we get on our knees.
Vote Restore or Conservatives, get Labour.
A note to Restore voters:
I know āVote Restore, Get Labourā irritates some people so let me explain why I say it.
Because itās the truth.
Voting Restore will hand this country to the Left.
Weāve seen it in Dover, Blackpool, Dudley, and elsewhere.
I get why Restore voters are livid.
I am angrier than you with the state of the country, I suspect.
But the reality is that the Right will lose the next general election if it does not consolidate.
Roughly 60% of left-wing voters tell pollsters they are voting tactically.
Thatās Green or Lib Dems voting Labour not because they agree with Labour or Burnham.
But because they want to stop the Right and they are putting the wider mission, not their party, first.
But only 30% of right-wing voters are doing the same.
The Left is much more disciplined and ruthless than the Right.
The reason Burnham and Labour are now back on 30-32% is because they are winning back left wing voters who are willing to do whatever it takes to control the country.
Greens holding their nose to vote Labour.
Lib Dems holding their nose to do the same.
2024 Labour voters coming home to Labour to stop the Right.
And they are on course to do it.
All MRP polls suggest the Left is on course to win the next general election, whether by winning a majority or in coalition.
That means more migration.
More refugees.
More taxes.
More two-tier policies.
More open borders.
More soft-on-Islamism.
More EU and free movement.
And a system of PR to ensure the Left continue to dominate Britain going forward.
They will give children, migrants and refugees the vote.
They will turn a blind eye to family voting and mass postal fraud.
That is what is about to happen.
They will control Britain until at least the 2030s, maybe longer.
Because they are boxing clever.
Many pro-Restore voices who claim to represent you are fully invested in dividing the Right.
Their YouTube channels, their āindependent mediaā, their entire existence depends on amplifying the splits, the drama, the chaos on the Right.
Those people will be fine under this long period of left-wing rule.
They will continue to scream into their phones and encourage you to do the same.
Rupert Lowe will probably end up in the Lords, put there by the same Tories who just put him on a committee and who he himself says āhe talks to all the timeā.
But the British people, the country, will lose out.
It is the people who will be screwed.
And just look at the total hypocrisy.
Restore criticise Reform for taking one or two ex-conservatives.
While Restore is literally standing ex-Tories at the next general election!! You do know this?
I just think you are being led up the garden path by a lot of people who do not understand how first-past-the-post systems work and are invested in sowing chaos.
The only way the Left is stopped is by winning a broad coalition.
That coalition is there.
At recent local elections upwards of 50% have been voting for right-wing parties.
But Labour and Green candidates have been winning on just 25-30% of the vote.
That is your next general election.
Itās not about Nigel, or Rupert, or even Reform or Restore.
It is about the country.
It is about the British people.
Look at France right now.
One right-wing party is preparing to win the presidency and power.
Another is flailing around on 3%.
Do you want power or 3%?
To leave the ECHR or 3%?
To end mass migration or 3%?
To ban Muslim Brotherhood or 3%?
To stop the boats or 3%?
To end welfare for foreign nationals and slash overseas aid or 3%?
It is about whether the Right is going to be smart enough, ruthless enough and disciplined enough to put the country first.
Because if we donāt we will lose it.
It is that simple.
The Left understand what is required to win power. Many people on the Right currently do not.
That has to change otherwise it is game over.
CPierceUK retweeted
They literally have nothing else in the tank apart from nostalgia for those glory days when Brussels wrote the laws & UK politicians implemented them. Taking responsibility for our country's destiny? Nah, far too difficult. Democracy be damned.
NEW
Rachel Reeves tonight declares Britain should return to the European Union
The former chancellor says Brexit made the UK āpoorer, weaker and less secureā
She will make her case in a lecture at the Harvard Kennedy School on Monday
Reeves helped draft the Labour 2024 manifesto which said no EU return
Sheās one of the most prominent Lab figures to back rejoin since Burnham became PM
The tectonic plates within Labour are shifting. Will more follow her?
Reeves writes in The Sunday Times:
āI am proud of the progress we have already made in strengthening our relationship with the European Union. Brexit has made us poorer, weaker and less secure.
āThere is a debate to be had about our future relationship with Europe, and I welcome Andy Burnhamās leadership in facing up to this. No one in the Treasury ever doubted where my instincts were.
āI do believe Britainās future lies in the European Union.
āHowever, it is incumbent on supporters of our re-entry to make the argument, demonstrate tangible benefits and to get the next steps right ā especially ahead of the UK-EU summit later this month, where at a minimum we should be looking for confirmation of the ambitious youth mobility scheme negotiated earlier this year, and ā I hope ā progress towards entry into the SAFE defence partnership.ā
thetimes.com/article/06d9b6aā¦
CPierceUK retweeted
Ko smo se odloÄali za vstop v EU, si ni nihÄe predstavljal, da bo v kaki njeni Älanici in uniji nasploh mogoÄe brez posledic:
1. Razveljaviti predsedniŔke volitve (Romunija);
2. Ukiniti informativni program na nacionalni RTV (Madžarska);
3. Poslati policijo na Ustavno sodiÅ”Äe (Poljska);
4. Tri tedne pred volitvami poslati v zapor predsednika stranke, ki vodi v anketah (Slovenija);
5. Zasesti nacionalno RTV s policijo in zamenjati vodstvo (Poljska);
6. Prekiniti mandate vodstvu nacionalne RTV in izvesti Äistko zaposlenih (Slovenija);
7. Poslati v zapor Älane prejÅ”nje vlade brez možnosti obrambe (Madžarska);
8. Podeliti skoraj milijon državljanstev ilegalnim migrantom po hitrem postopku (Španija);
9. Zapreti novo Nuklearno elektrarno in zgraditi plinovod do Rusije (NemÄija);
10. ObdavÄiti ogljiÄne energetske vire ob hkratnem zapiranju NE ter preseliti industrijo v države z nizkimi ekoloÅ”kimi standardi pod pretvezo, da tako reÅ”ujemo planet.
Nastala je EU, ki se mora reŔevati sama pred sabo.
CPierceUK retweeted
When Boris Johnson prorogued Parliament in 2019, (as Major & Attlee had done) EU Council president Donald Tusk accused him of "bypassing democratic scrutiny". Now Tusk has staged an actual coup, the Council & Commission are silent. There isn't a law yet globalists won't overrule.
CPierceUK retweeted
Hey @FraserMyers since we spoke for this @spikedonline episode I have had about a dozen positive contacts from active or recently retired BBC people. Only two were known to me before and at least one of them is in a senior position in news/current affairs as of now.
Here's a typical example, from today:
'Hi Phil. You donāt know me but I just wanted to thank you for speaking out on the spiked podcast. Iāve been a journalist at the BBC for two decades and Iāve never been as worried about our direction and groupthink as much as I am now. Thanks again and good luck.' youtube.com/watch?v=W0x52UR5ā¦
CPierceUK retweeted
Omg Bash gave his money to CHOOSE LOVE - āfor queer refugees and displaced peopleā - and Romesh donated his to the Refugee Council. The Refugee Council received Ā£41,588,000 from taxpayers between 2021-25 and Choose Loveās total income for 2025 was Ā£12,593,084! They do not need the money. So many small, struggling charities could have done with the help and publicity! #celebritytraitors
Hermann Tertsch - European Parliament member journalist with VOX for Spain š
Para quienes no hayan comprendido la gravedad de los hechos acaecidos desde ayer en Polonia o ni siquiera se han enterado porque los medios los han encubierto y solo han podido seguirse por las redes, el gobierno de Tusk ordenĆ³ ayer denegar permiso de aterrizaje al aviĆ³n del jefe del estado, del presidente Karol Nawrocki. Los pilotos militares del aviĆ³n presidencial desobedecieron a la torre de control y aterrizaron sin permiso.
En Bruselas todos callan hasta que salgan defendiendo a Tusk que al fin y al cabo es un tĆtere de von der Leyen que jamĆ”s habrĆa perpetrado este intento de golpe de Estado sin el permiso de su jefa.
CPierceUK retweeted
You can cancel an election and ban the winner from running (Romania), you can ban your opponents from ever running again (Hungary), you can threaten to ban the main opposition party and subject it to relentless investigations by the secret police (Germany), you can threaten a ban on the leading presidential candidate and make them wear an ankle monitor (France), every member of your circle can be investigated for corruption (Spain), you can try and cancel local elections because you will lose them (Britain), and you can storm the constitutional court with riot police because you want to control it (Poland).
You can just do all these things. The secret is you just have to be on the right side of the European Commission.
CPierceUK retweeted
Why don't Iranians like Eisenkot?
It's a twofold reason and I'll tell you.
ā¢ First of all, Bibi Netanyahu is profoundly beloved in Iran. It goes beyond anything you can imagine. It's something you need to understand before I explain anything else.
At a time when Iranians were being slaughtered and the entire world was dead silent, Bibi came in like the personification of our need for vengeance against the islamic regime. Watching our oppressors blown apart and their coffins stacked on top of each other is a kind of satisfaction that's hard to put into words. Bibi did that, nobody else did.
He did so along with the message that he intends to help Iran overthrow the IR. This may sound weird or unrealistic to a non-Iranian, but to us, it's everything. We have truly never had anyone on our side, and now we have the most powerful man in the Middle East basically returning Cyrus the Great's favour from 2500 years ago. Sure, Trump is of course there too, but nobody knows where his head is at from minute to minute. Netanyahu is the one Iranians trust the most at this point.
With this kind of admiration comes a defensiveness against anyone who tries to tear him down or disrupt him.
ā¢ And then we have Eisenkot. I'm sure he's a great guy in his personal life. And we have every respect for his family's sacrifices in wars.
But our impression is that he is blindingly naive when it comes to Iran. He has openly said that he doesn't want to pursue regime change, and that his only concern is nuclear weapons and missiles. Apparently at one point he even used North Korea as an example for why a nuclear IR isn't that serious.
What this tells us, is that Eisenkot's policy is to abandon Iran and ensure the regime's survival at a time when Netanyahu declared he has instructed the IDF and Mossad to bring it down.
Basically quitting the mission when it's 90% complete.
That, to us, is a betrayal.
Iranians have stood by Israelis all this time when the entire rest of the world didn't. Even from inside Iran, people post videos chanting "Bibi joon". People support Israel from inside the slaughterhouse at a massive risk to their lives. And Eisenkot now looks like a man who openly wants to waste all our sacrifices and hopes because he "doesn't think the IR can be brought down militarily". That's unacceptable.
I can't overstate that Eisenkot winning and unseating Netanyahu at the most critical time in modern Iranian history could potentially turn millions of Iranians against Israel. It would be a tragic missed opportunity to finally heal the Middle East of the Shia Axis cancer.
Hope this helps!
