Dan...Dan....Dan...... Before you blindly defend Michael Proctor, you might want to familiarize yourself with the actual timeline and evidence. Because your argument falls apart the moment you do. Alarm.com recorded a timestamp of 4:16 P.M. The drive from the Read residence to Canton takes approximately 43 minutes. Give him a full hour because of the storm, and that puts the SUV at the sally port around 5:00–5:15 P.M. So spare everyone the ridiculous argument that Proctor didn't have enough time. He had plenty. Now let's discuss the conveniently missing surveillance footage and the inverted video. The timestamp wasn't inverted along with the image. That raises legitimate questions about how the footage was processed, whether it was altered, and why portions are missing. But apparently, we're supposed to accept all of that without question because the Commonwealth says so? You have to manually adjust the time so it's not inverted with the rest of the video. It didn't magically do that it's self..... And here's what you conveniently overlook: They called in the SERT team, not a dedicated forensic crime scene team. Those are not interchangeable. The way that scene was searched, documented, and processed deserves serious scrutiny. There is a reason CSI was not called to the scene, and I am pretty sure you know why, just don't want to admit it. Now explain this, Dan: First responders were all over that yard. Walking, kneeling, walking, searching, and attempting to save John O'Keefe's life. Yet none reported stepping on or seeing red taillight fragments scattered across the snow. Gallagher was blowing snow all over the place, he was so proud of himself, blowing evidence all around the crime scene, disrupting any traces of foot prints or tire treads, anything that could have been useful. He thought his idea was brilliant!! They saw the small amount of blood droplets, red blood droplets on white snow...I mean, how could you miss it right? He even managed to located a CLEAR piece of cocktail glass in WHITE snow, but nobody noticed the RED taillight fragments supposedly scattered around the same area? Not while Gallagher was mastering the art of destroying evidence not while first responders were working on John. Not while they were standing around after John was taken away. Wouldn't they have noticed it then? It was under him, it allegedly cut his arm according to you. So where was it? Surely there would have been some surrounding his body right? But no one saw it. Not even before Jenn McCabe snuck into the house. Why? why didn't they see any? someone should have right? WRONG.....the taillight evidence wasn't reported until AFTER Proctor took possession of Karen Read's SUV. That's an extraordinary sequence of events, especially when combined with the missing footage, questionable video presentation, and evidence-handling concerns. The timeline is evidence. The missing footage is an issue. The absence of documented taillight discoveries by first responders is an issue. Evidence planting is a crime.....all these serious allegation deserve scrutiny, not blind dismissal. So, Dan..... skepticism isn't the problem here. Your willingness to accept the Commonwealth's narrative and Proctor's version of events without applying that same skepticism is the actual problem. Well, that and a State Police Trooper overestimating his ability to cover up a murder. Try fact checking the evidence before lecturing people and defending the actions of a disgraced MSP Trooper.