Pinned Tweet
torontosun.com/opinion/columโฆ
LILLEY: Docs show Trudeau โknewโ carbon tax would hurt economy.
Pat P retweeted
I keep hearing costs, more costs, and more costs on things that don't have anything to do with Canada.
Mark Carney, translated from French;
"With this new alliance for the future,
the idea is to find large-scale solutions:
> Defending Ukraine
> Rebuilding Ukraine
> Fighting climate change
> Financing that climate change fight"
Huh?!
Pat P retweeted
Trade with Europe? Absolutely.
But European Union taxation, regulation, and migration? Heck no.
Mark Carney is pursuing EU โassociate membershipโ without telling Canadians what it means.
Our sovereignty is not for sale. Canada must never be a star on someone elseโs flag.
Pat P retweeted
I have no doubt that all of this is true.
But I do not trust Ursula von der Leyen or Mark Carney.
Heโs been having secret meetings with the EU since he first got elected.
I also think this is about London globalists going after Trump, and with the midterms days away, theyโre no doubt upping the game.
But for me it comes down to this...I don't trust either of these ghouls. They're up to something nefarious ๐คจ
๐จ๐ฆ๐ช๐บ ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐จ๐๐ ๐๐ก ๐ ๐ข๐ก๐ง๐ฅ๐๐๐ | ๐ช๐๐๐ง ๐๐ง ๐๐ฆ & ๐ช๐๐๐ง ๐๐ง ๐๐ฆ๐ก'๐ง! ๐๐ฆ๐ต ๐ฎ๐ฆ ๐ฆ๐น๐ฑ๐ญ๐ข๐ช๐ฏ!
Those who've followed my work should know by now that ๐'๐ฉ๐ ๐๐๐๐ก ๐ค๐จ๐๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ข๐ก๐๐ก๐ ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐จ๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ ๐ง๐๐ ๐๐จ ๐๐ข๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฆ.
I've investigated her extensively, and my concerns about her political agenda haven't changed. ๐ก๐ข๐ง ๐๐ฉ๐๐ก ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐๐ง๐๐ฌ! I don't trust her!
With that said, after listening to her speech today, I simply didn't hear what some people are claiming today on X.
There is such a lack of context and understanding of how laws work as it relates to the EU vis-ร -vis Canada, that it might as well be just fear-mongering.
I'm not saying everything was daisies. ๐๐จ๐ง!
๐ฃ๐๐ข๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ก๐ ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ข๐ฅ๐ง๐๐ก๐ง ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐ง๐ฆ ๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐๐๐!
๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐จ ๐ฌ๐๐ฎ ๐ ๐ฅ๐ช๐ฉ ๐ฉ๐๐๐ข ๐๐ฃ ๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐๐๐ค ๐๐๐ก๐ค๐ฌ!๐
People are focusing on words like "๐ฎ๐๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ" and "๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐" without explaining what she actually said about them.
And I think ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ deserve to hear those parts too, because leaving them out gives an entirely different impression of what's actually being proposed.
๐จ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐จ๐๐ ๐๐ซ๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐ง๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐๐:
"๐ผ๐จ๐จ๐ค๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ค๐ฃ ๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ค๐ช๐ฉ ๐ผ๐๐๐๐จ๐จ๐๐ค๐ฃ."
That just means a closer business cooperation with the EU, ๐๐ง ๐๐ข๐๐ฆ ๐ก๐ข๐ง ๐ ๐๐๐ก ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ. Nor a loss of our Sovereignty to the EU!
๐ด๐ช๐๐๐ง ๐ง๐๐ ๐๐จ'๐ฆ ๐ข๐ช๐ก ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐๐ง๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐ง๐จ๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ฌ๐ด
โ๐๐ฅ๐ง๐๐๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ต (๐ง๐๐จ): EU membership is open to European states. Canada isn't a European state, and association doesn't make us a member.
โ๐๐ฅ๐ง๐๐๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ด (๐ง๐๐๐จ): EU regulations apply directly within member states. They don't automatically become Canadian law, nor can Brussels simply impose them on Canada.
โ๐๐ฅ๐ง๐๐๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฒ๐ณ (๐ง๐๐๐จ): The EU court's preliminary ruling system concerns courts of member states. Ursula saying "๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐" doesn't give European courts authority to override Canadian courts. It just means sharing of information and alignment on certain policies. Think migration laws.
โ๐๐ฅ๐ง๐๐๐๐๐ฆ ๐ฎ๐ญ & ๐ฐ๐ฑ (๐ง๐๐๐จ): EU free-movement rights don't automatically open Canada's borders. That would require separately negotiated agreements accepted by Canada, ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐น๐ถ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฎ๐น ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฎ๐ป ๐น๐ฒ๐ด๐ถ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป.
โ๐๐ฅ๐ง๐๐๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ณ (๐ง๐๐๐จ): The EU CAN establish association agreements with countries outside the Union, involving reciprocal rights and obligations.
๐๐๐ฆ๐ข ๐ช๐ข๐ฅ๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ก๐!
Canada's partnership with the EU didn't begin with Carney or Ursula. ๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ป๐ฐ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐จ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ป๐ฒ๐ด๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ต, and his government negotiated the broader ๐ฆ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฝ ๐๐ด๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ญ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฐ!
That agreement already covered security, energy, climate, migration and other areas of cooperation.
๐ง๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐ฆ๐ก'๐ง ๐ ๐ก๐๐ช ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ก๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ. They just want to expand it.
๐๐๐ก๐๐
international.gc.ca/world-moโฆ
๐ด๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ข๐๐๐๐ง๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐๐๐ฃ๐ด
As I posted earlier this week, Germany led objections to the proposed "๐ฎ๐๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ" terminology, with France, Italy and Greece also ๐ข๐๐๐๐๐ง๐๐ก๐ with the draft declaration.
๐ก๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ช
The wording was ๐ฅ๐๐ ๐ข๐ฉ๐๐ from the draft summit declaration, even though Ursula continued using the term in her speech today!
๐๐๐ก๐๐
euronews.com/2026/10/28/eu-rโฆ
๐ด๐๐ข๐ก๐๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ข๐ก๐ด
Canada is looking to build much closer ties with Europe, and it's about more than trade. Critical minerals, AI, energy, defence, research and cooperation on migration are all part of the broader relationship.
๐๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ฆ! Those policies can be questioned and criticized. ๐๐ก๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐๐ข๐จ๐๐ ๐๐!
๐๐จ๐ง ๐ก๐ข๐ก๐ ๐ข๐ ๐ง๐๐๐ง means Brussels is taking over Canada or that Davos is gonna start running our country. We already have the EU in Canada...
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ๐'๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ถ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น๐! ๐
I've never had a problem questioning Ursula, the EU, or Carney and their bullshit. But questioning them and claiming things that aren't supported by the facts are two very different things.
We've got enough shit to deal with, including billions in government spending on ๐๐จ๐๐๐ฆ๐๐๐ง ๐ง๐๐๐ง ๐๐๐๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ฆ are wasting money on that has nothing to do with the EU to investigate without making up new shit.
๐ฉ๐ฒ๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ
Pat P retweeted
โThe future of trade does take carbon into account, Carbon is tradeโ
Carney and Ursula over the next several days will introduce their plan to soak businesses, industries and their citizens out of even more money & it will all be under the guise of โfighting the climateโ
CBAM will make life less affordable, but Carney will claim itโs making businesses โmore competitiveโ
These are not good people.
Pat P retweeted
"Canada is by far the most European of the non-European countries."
Argentina likely has the highest share of its local population with ties to the EU most of them even holding EU citizenship alongside their Argentine nationality.
Uruguay would likely follow closely and Brazil wouldn't be too far behind.
In all three countries, people with EU descent exceeds 80% (with ties to Portugal, Spain, Italy and Germany particularly prominent).
About two-thirds of Canadians, however, have no ties to any current EU member state so not sure where this notion comes from since most Canadians have zero personal EU ties.
Pat P retweeted
Does this sound like Canada will remain a sovereign nation?
Why does our Parliament need to discuss anything with an unelected Parliament in Europe?
Why is our court system aligning
with a another court system system across an ocean?
This is the second time weโve heard this from von der Leyen. Itโs messaging.
Pat P retweeted
Who agrees with me that Carney has no mandate to take Canada into any-form of EU alliance?
He was elected to get an USA trade deal done !
He wasnโt empowered to make this unilateral decision without HOC debate and vote !
He is leveraging his manufactured majority to pass this !
Alarming !
Pat P retweeted
Claiming 70% of Canadians want "associate EU membership" is untrue.
We hear a lot of grand promises and big buzzwords, but as always, the devil is in the details. Look past the headline at the actual Leger data:
- 70% like the idea of closer trade ties and travel.
- Only 25% support handing over Canadian regulatory control to match EU standards.
- EU capitals are already shutting the door on the whole idea.
Anyone in business knows you don't sign a deal before reading the fine print. Canadians want sensible trade, not surrendering our sovereignty to the bureaucrats in Brussels.
Common sense usually wins when you ask the questions the right way.
Mark Carney's globalist forays rejected, including EU associate membership. Yet 70% of Canadians support Carney according to polling.
Believe that number?
-
Von der Leyenโs โassociate membershipโ Canada bid put her on a collision course with EU countries euronews.com/2026/10/27/von-โฆ
Pat P retweeted
Carney was asked twice about ๐บ๐ธ trade deal & proof of his assertion that "they're moving on red lines."
๐ฅ Here's his stumbling, word salad answer.
1โฃ Vagueness on sovereignty, culture, French discoverability on streaming services. Which Jamieson Greer refuted as a very minor issue that was never a "red line."
2โฃ Autos. After lecturing the reporter about the difference between a pickup & heavy duty truck - "not constructive to give a running commentary on the discussions." Also, the sovereignty issue was "decisive in itself."
๐ That's it. So much winning.
๐คฌ If your company went under or you lost your job due to the s338 50% tariff imposed in August - this is what you lost it over.
Pat P retweeted
Every few hours, we're inundated with news that 75% of Canadians want closer ties to the EU
They surveyed 100o people to get these alleged results
This is an X poll of 4,500 with 96.5% saying NO๐๐ผ
We're being gaslit
teapaw.org/MarcNixon24/status/211โฆ
Nearly three-quarters of Canadians support PM in seeking closer ties with Europe nationalpost.com/news/canadaโฆ
Pat P retweeted
$48.8 Billion: Thatโs Canadaโs trade imbalance with the EU -no wonder they are here to take advantage of Canada yet again !!
Also another $7.3 billion in services deficit
Every year since CETA we buy more than we sell to the EU !
Closer ties -so far itโs a one way street !
Pat P retweeted
Again from the things Canadians have to learn from foreign media on CBC file: "In particular, the Buy Canadian is a very unpopular policy in the EU and similarly, the EU has its own made in Europe policy that it is implementing that Canada does not like."โPOLITICO's Chief EU Correspondent, Zoya Sheftalovich @zoyashef
Pat P retweeted
โผ๏ธWOW -- Ursula announces a New World Order with "the EU and Canada as the nucleus" says Canada is just "the start"
Then
Mark Carney has A MAJOR Freudian slip.....calls it "the resistance"
Did anyone in Canada vote for THIS??
Pat P retweeted
Numbers donโt lie, but the @liberal_party gov & PM @MarkJCarney sure do!!
โ
TRUE annualized growth is 1.0%. Not Carneyโs deceitful, cherry picked Q2 x 4. ๐จ๐ฆ-๐บ๐ธ The contrast is stark.
๐ CPI is 3.3%. Core inflation is 2.2%. Borrowing rates are climbing.
๐ Food banks are at record usage. 1 in 4 are struggling to feed themselves.
๐ Insolvencies are at a 17-year high.
๐ฐ Carney intends to add $700 BILLION in inflationary mega debt over the next 5 years.
๐ฅ Weโre not keeping up. This is a crisis in the making.
Pat P retweeted
Opinion: If Europe gets a closer look at Canada, it may not like what it finds theglobeandmail.com/businessโฆ
Pat P retweeted
Canada is facing an EU carbon tariff in the coming months that could affect $3B in Canadian exports.
Instead of fixing the issue, the PM has spent months distracting Canadians with talk of the EU.
As the EU Summit wraps today, will the carbon tariff have been lifted - OR - will the Liberals raise their industrial carbon tax to meet the new standard?
Pat P retweeted
So controlled Carney is also doubling down on this?
The idea of this โassociate membershipโ has only ever been promoted by the media. Zero pushback, zero criticism, zero consequences.
โ51st stateโ was a supposed attack on Canada, the media went nuts, they fed Canadians fear and hatred over it because they were told to by The Government.
51st State bad but 28th Member State good?
This Euro globalist has gone rogue, he has overstepped his position as the Prime Minister of Canada.
Pat P retweeted
Jack Mintz: EU 'partnership' is not the answer to our U.S. problems financialpost.com/opinion/jaโฆ
