Slaying bad times and taking names. Mostly just taking naps, though!

Detroit, MI
Joined February 2009
Simply not true, took a ride through the heart of Detroit Jewish community again yesterday; Lincoln from Woodward to Greenfield. Anyone that knows this area knows this is the heart. Total support lawn signs were 14 Abdul to 9 Roger's. This is overstated. Plenty of Abdul support.
New York Times national reporter: Lifelong Jewish Democrats in Detroit suburbs say they’re voting Republican for the first time. "That’s a big deal. I don’t know of any other marquee race in the country right now where the Republican candidate is converting Democrats."
8
6
1
45
3,211
Earthling Rap Ⓥ retweeted
Abdul El-Sayed's closing statement at the debate was so beautiful.
7
77
770
14,176
Wow, Wow, wow, this is simply outstanding! Three titans of the left; Richard Wolff, Cornel West, & Norman Finkelstein: America Is in DENIAL |... youtu.be/HFc5by8F2S0?si=xgtI… via it's nearly 3 hrs long I'm almost done with hour one, and I'm just blown away!
1
1
103
These people are shameless here's another Hillary Clinton, Buttigieg consultant trying to throw the MI Senate election. Abdul's gonna win this thing, but just remember what these pathetic weasels did, or tried to do!
I ran a SuperPAC that supported @MalloryMcMorrow. This poll was used by several donors to pull back funding at a time we were being outspent by $80 million.
66
Some of the propaganda will probably work, and Trump will probably send in the stormtroopers. In reality Abdul should win by 20, I'm calling a 5 point victory, we'll see!
Marist poll Likely voters 🔵 El-Sayed 50% 🔴 Rogers 48% 🔵 Benson 51% 🔴 James 45% Registered voters 🔵 El-Sayed +7 🔵 Benson +11
1
5
169
"One day governments will offer apologies to journalists sacked for holding Israeli officials' feet to the fire." This made me cry, it's beautiful, please read it;
I know you know this picture. All adult people who've carried some of the pain of this world for others do. 58 years ago this month, three men stood on an Olympic podium in Mexico City. Two of them, courageous to a level most people will never reach or even aspire to reach, became famous for raising their fists. The third didn't raise his fist. But he knew exactly what was happening. 16 October 1968. The Olympic Games in Mexico City. The United States is being torn apart by racial conflict. Martin Luther King has been murdered six months earlier. Black Americans are still fighting for rights that other Americans take for granted. Two American sprinters, Tommie Smith and John Carlos, have just won gold and bronze in the 200 metres. Between them stands a 26-year-old white Australian called Peter Norman. Norman has run the race of his life. He's won SILVER, beating Carlos, one of the overwhelming favourites. His time of 20.06 seconds is so astonishing that it will remain the Australian national record for another 56 years. He should be thinking about his medal, his future, the applause, the extraordinary doors that might open for him. But Smith and Carlos have something else on their minds. They're planning to protest racial injustice during the medal ceremony. In front of the entire world. And they tell Norman what they're going to do. Norman is Australian. The American civil rights movement isn't his fight. He could simply stand there, smile politely, collect his silver medal and go home. Nobody would ever know that he had been given an opportunity to demonstrate moral courage and declined it. But Norman asks the Americans what he can do to help. And he tells them: "I'll stand with you." There's a practical problem. Smith and Carlos have planned to wear black gloves, but Carlos has forgotten his pair. Norman suggests something beautifully simple. Why don't they share the remaining pair? One glove each. That's why, in the famous photograph, Smith raises his RIGHT fist and Carlos raises his LEFT. The Australian also finds himself an Olympic Project for Human Rights badge. He pins it to his tracksuit. And the three men step onto the podium. The American national anthem begins. Smith and Carlos bow their heads and raise their fists. Norman stands beside them. A small white man in an Australian tracksuit, wearing a tiny badge. It doesn't look particularly spectacular. No shouting. No violence. No great revolutionary speech. Just three men saying, in their own ways, that human beings deserve to be treated as human beings. And the sporting establishment goes NUTS. Smith and Carlos are expelled from the Games. They're denounced, threatened and treated as traitors for daring to make people uncomfortable during a sporting event. Norman returns to Australia. His country has its own ugly history of racial exclusion, particularly concerning its Indigenous population. And there are plenty of Australians who aren't particularly thrilled that their Olympic silver medallist has associated himself with two Black American protesters. Norman encounters hostility and ostracism in parts of the sporting world. Four years later, he isn't selected for the Munich Olympics. Norman never repudiates what he did. Peter Norman dies in 2006, aged 64. At his funeral in Melbourne, two men have travelled all the way from America. Tommie Smith. John Carlos. The two Black American athletes he had supported 38 years earlier. And they carry his coffin. Carlos told the mourners that Norman hadn't stood in front of them or behind them. He had stood WITH them. In 2012, the Australian Parliament finally apologised for Norman's treatment and its failure to recognise his courage while he was alive. Forty-four years after the protest. Six years after the man was dead. One day governments will offer apologies to journalists sacked for holding Israeli officials' feet to the fire. Hopefully before they die.
1
2
43
Fun fact after this Brent Musburger called U.S. Olympic athletes Tommie Smith and John Carlos "black-skinned stormtroopers". He's never apologized to this day.
1
16
Spot on Ben!
You think he won because primary voters believed a couple polls showed AES as a better candidate in the general? You know why he won: he excited people and he’s much better at this than she was. Now he has to be even better. Suggesting a polling conspiracy sounds silly.
57
Earthling Rap Ⓥ retweeted
You think he won because primary voters believed a couple polls showed AES as a better candidate in the general? You know why he won: he excited people and he’s much better at this than she was. Now he has to be even better. Suggesting a polling conspiracy sounds silly.
Replying to @DCCyclone
You are totally wrong. And you are wrong because, and I say this with respect, you were totally duped by these polls. You fed a narrative that AES had a better chance than Haley and that basically bs. Just own up.
57
75
14
1,475
42,561
Earthling Rap Ⓥ retweeted
In 6 years of organizing medical professionals @ctphealthcare - 700 doctors endorsing a single candidate is the largest outpouring of support we have ever seen. Anywhere in the country. @AbdulElSayed has the backing of people who know we need to fix our broken system.
1
3
160
They @BulwarkOnline are not serious people, and they certainly are not in your corner!
Tim Miller updates Bill Kristol on the fallout over James Carville Tim: That's wrong. That is a bad point. I think James maybe is getting a little too wrapped up in his internal factional politics there Bill: You shouldn't always take James too literally. Sometimes you have to take him seriously... I didn't know that had gotten him or us in trouble. Tim: You do concur that it'd be better to have a narrow democratic majority? Bill: Yes. Generally, it's better to win than to lose, which I think is also something Carville *usually* says
5
293
Earthling Rap Ⓥ retweeted
Massive protests in #Tokyo are calling for the Japanese prime minister to be ousted over his support for the United States and Israel. 🇵🇸🫂🇯🇵
617
4,306
201
17,521
633,260
Earthling Rap Ⓥ retweeted
Due to the expanded "hate speech" codes that Trump forced leading American universities to adopt, it's prohibited to "accuse Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel," even when they explicitly boast that is how they vote. You will be fired or expelled if you say it:
I'm a Michigan voter, a Jew, and a lifelong Democrat who will not be voting for Abdul El-Sayed. He supports the most repressive, fascist, genocidal regimes in the Middle East because they oppose Israel, which contains half the world's Jews. Telling me to vote for him "for the greater good" would be akin to telling a Black voter to support a member of the Klan. El-Sayed may speak the language of progressives, but he has only one agenda, and it isn't free stuff for everybody ... or whatever. History lesson: The Islamist/socialist partnership in the Iranian Revolution ended with the socialists executed along with the Jews.
77
441
3
3,092
98,597
There is no evidence that Abdul El-Sayed has ever had personal membership in or formal affiliation with the Muslim Brotherhood. And he's denied it countless times. These people are KKK like ghouls!
It's not because you're Muslim that people are asking you to condemn the Muslim Brotherhood. It's because your family has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and you have a problem denouncing terrorists. Blaming this on your faith and implying questioning you is racist is despicable.
3
4
8
569
Just another absolute Zionist Racist, they are no different than the Klan, he's a Democrat btw. #BothSidesDoIt
Unless Abdul El-Sayed can unequivocally condemn the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, SJP, the IRGC, and Hasan Piker, Barack Obama should absolutely not campaign with him. I understand and support the drive to win majorities in Congress, but we Democrats will be doing immeasurable harm to ourselves if we drop all standards and violate our best principles in pursuit of that goal.
1
3
1
11
361
Earthling Rap Ⓥ retweeted
Replying to @detroitnews
1
1
6
340
I don't have to say the Corporate Democrats are deceiving and evil, @mehdirhasan does a wonderful job right here. @neeratanden, @JamesCarville, @KamalaHarris, and @HillaryClinton are not in your corner America!
Hi Neera, I never responded because I prefer not to do post-show online-only debates with guests, and let the full @AJHeadtoHead video episodes speak for themselves. Also, your argument is with AES, who I quoted on the show as disagreeing with you, not with me (I didn't write your plan or his plan). But since you're intent on fighting with every leftist on the internet and are now calling me out, and (wrongly) accusing me of a "major error" and being "misleading," let me respond. The CAP plan you and your CAP colleague have repeatedly linked to and screenshotted makes it very clear that everyone would be "eligible" for Medicare, yes, but not auto-enrolled. You had previously said your plan was the "same" as AES's and then moved the goalposts on my show, saying "similar," but either way, AES disagrees with you because his plan, he says, auto-enrolls everyone in Medicare. Your plan auto-enrolls kids, the elderly, and the uninsured. So the "major error," in claiming they're the "same," is yours, not mine. @NathanJRobinson already pointed this out to you in your replies but you just keep going with this false claim that your plans are the "same" and the false claim that "the CAP plan has autoenrollment" for everyone. It does not. But since I now have your attention, and since you got me to respond, it's time for you to respond to my questions please, which you "never" have: 1) Why did you say on Head to Head to me that you had criticized Mike Rogers's extremist pastor ally Lorenzo Sewell, when I can find no such tweet? Where did you do that? Can you provide a link please? Or were you being "misleading"? 2) Why did you say to others on here that you had called out the raid of Ilhan Omar's home when no one can find any such tweet from you from that day? xitter.cf/neeratanden/status/211… Can you provide a link please? Or were you being "misleading"? 3) Finally, why did you say to the House Oversight Committee last year, when you were asked: "At any point during the administration did you have any concerns about President Biden's cognitive abilities?," I did not," but then say to me on Head to Head that, at the time: "I had deep concerns about him staying in office." Isn't that "misleading"? Weren't you *under oath* when you said the opposite to Congress? I'll be right here waiting for your responses @neeratanden.
2
5
277
Earthling Rap Ⓥ retweeted
Told you all. Here he is saying out in the open.
James Carville says he'd rather have Republicans keep control of the House than Democrats winning the chamber by 5 seats. "I would rather the Republicans keep the House by five than the Democrats win by five, because if that happens, they’re hostage to the DSA. Like, Hakeem cannot move. There’s no place for him to go."
23
48
3
419
9,990
Have known this for years, the Hillary crowd doesn't want Democrats to win unless they can control the people with bad health care, bad housing, and blank checks to Israel, and now they've admitted as much!
1
3
9
369