Vasilis Stavrinides (@VStavrinides) header
Vasilis Stavrinides (@VStavrinides) profile picture

@NIHRresearch ACF @ImperialCollege; @The_MRC Clinical Research Fellow @UCL; @PCFnews Young Investigator; Graduate Statistician @RoyalStatSoc @turinginst

London, England
Joined February 2018
Photo by Vasilis Stavrinides (@VStavrinides)Photo by Vasilis Stavrinides (@VStavrinides)
Vasilis Stavrinides retweeted
What a weekend! ⚽️ Also… huge honour to lead my first Focal One Robotic HIFU list! @ImperialNHS @IP_London Indebted to: @LondonProstate1 @TaimurShah @FocalOneHIFU @joshuarobotics Dr Pierre Charles Henry (HIFU Proctor) Dr Markovic (Anaesthetist) Anmol & Alfin Onwards & upwards. Delighted to add this fantastic focal therapy option to the armamentarium. Excellent user interface & image integration. #HIFU #FocalTherapy #July4th #QuaterFinals – at Hammersmith, London
1
17
1
26
2,308
Vasilis Stavrinides retweeted
Focal prostate HIFU 🎯 What an honour, privilege & pleasure to now re-join the renowned Imperial Prostate team @IP_London team as Hons Consultant Urological Surgeon & deliver focal therapy! Very grateful to have been welcomed back warmly, and to help give best possible outcomes for our patients @ImperialSandC @ImperialNHS @FocalSociety @UkFocal @LondonProstate1 @TaimurShah
5
14
1
39
3,386
If you are a clinician interested in prostate cancer research, imaging, pathology, data analysis and translational work, take this opportunity to work in @uclmedsci @AttardLab @ReIMAGINE_PCa group! Only a few days left to apply! ucl.ac.uk/work-at-ucl/search…
1
322
Let's kill the real monster...the prostate cancer. #17 at Speed mentoring session at #PCFRetreat23 @PCF_Science @TylerSbrt @RenuEapen @DrSpratticus @AmarUKishan @VStavrinides #PCSM
4
10
1,329
Vasilis Stavrinides retweeted
At BBC for @BBCr4today interview on how we’re doing better with a safer, more accurate & less harmful pathway MRI, targeted biopsy and focal therapy @IP_London @imperialurology @ImperialSandC @imperialcollege @ImperialNHS @ProstateUK Time point:2:48. bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m001gx…
6
27
3
150
25,572
Vasilis Stavrinides retweeted
In 161 men from the PROMIS trial, prostate zones that contained Gleason score 3+4 cancer were 3x more likely to be MRI-positive than benign zones and almost 9x if they had a Gleason score ≥4+3. @VStavrinides @MrJosephNorris @giga_fra @IP_London @The_MRC bit.ly/3UWgbhr
11
1
40
7,886
Vasilis Stavrinides retweeted
Dr. Harmath discusses prospective validation of MRI signal abnormalities and clinically significant cancer in this editorial. bit.ly/3FEGF1a
In 161 men from the PROMIS trial, prostate zones that contained Gleason score 3+4 cancer were 3x more likely to be MRI-positive than benign zones and almost 9x if they had a Gleason score ≥4+3. @VStavrinides @MrJosephNorris @giga_fra @IP_London @The_MRC bit.ly/3UWgbhr
2
6
3,137
Vasilis Stavrinides retweeted
Schrödinger's Plates: They are both broken and not broken until you open the door.
1,435
15,938
1,357
115,665
Vasilis Stavrinides retweeted
A diver in Belize has made friends with an octopus. She named him Egbert and brings him treats in his own jar. (Video Elora Kooistra)
495
7,036
876
71,535
Vasilis Stavrinides retweeted
From @SigridCarlsson - “if it ain’t broke don’t fix it” genomic testing in AS. RE: genomic differences based on MR-conspicuity: should we be deciding on genomic testing based on MR characteristics & targeting? 1/2 @cooperberg_ucsf @MrJosephNorris @VStavrinides @b3nsimp #EAU22
1
7
24
Vasilis Stavrinides retweeted
The #AUA22 with a European twist 🇬🇧 🇮🇹 🇧🇪 🇵🇱 🇪🇺 @BWHUrology @ucl @HUNIMED @orsiacademy – at New Orleans, LA
2
10
23
Current Issue: Magnetic Resonance Imaging–guided Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: Time to Say Goodbye to Protocol-based Biopsies buff.ly/3Dk68LZ @giga_fra @VStavrinides @mrsprostate #MRI #prostatecancer #biopsies #openscience #openaccess #urology #MedTwitter
15
24
Vasilis Stavrinides retweeted
doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2022… If we are serious about using ML for some clinical tasks, a lot need to be redefined, e.g. what a good quality image is. Without noise or defect? or "good enough" for NNs to work with? @shaheersd has some interesting poitns in his new MedIA paper.
1
8
1
39