Dad. 𝘾𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙩𝙤𝙧 / Full-stack builder / Gen AI / Local AI / Workflows / +25k subs on YouTube 🇪🇸🇪🇺Founder of @notjustprompts and @arkdbox

Valencia, Spain
Joined July 2009
Go Beyond. Nothing is impossible anymore. Contact @notjustprompts for videos like this.
8
5
1
29
4,900
Hey @AorusOfficial @NVIDIARTXSpark @NVIDIAAIDev could you please help with this? DGX Sparks have a bug in the firmware that affects temperature 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Hey @GIGABYTE my 4500€ AI TOP ATOM hits 96–97 °C with the hardware thermal brake under normal GPU load since EC firmware 0x0300050b (Oct 24). No fan control, power limit locked. Ticket filed via @AorusOfficial eSupport. Is there a fixed EC coming? Other GB10 owners report the same. @NVIDIAAIDev - It's an expensive machine and this should be expedited.
57
Hey @1Password, since today, every time the autocomplete window shows on my iPhone, I have to enter my master password. Why is that? Latest app and iOS version, premium account.
2
4
959
Cohere says Qwen tried to send data to China. Bullshit. 1 call in 100,000, and thats their own number. They wont even tell you how many calls they ran. They ran the same task again and Qwen wrote the correct rule. So they forced it. They fed the model its own reasoning plus the start of a bash command and sampled hundreds of times until it typed a URL. 1 curl flag took that from 4% to 92%. Thats not a finding. They wrote half the command for it. Where are the transcripts? The code? The checkpoint, the quant, the sampling settings? "We publish the hosts and the trigger." Link? Nothing. Did anyone ask Alibaba? Not a word. And their own conclusion: they cannot say if any of it is deliberate. Who wrote it? A company that sells "sovereign AI", just launched a cyber business, wrote part of the post with its own product, and wants governments to put checks on open weights. Released the same day Anthropic filed for its IPO. Andrew Curran is already talking about new laws. For me this is the same fucking wave. Scare people off the models they can run themselves, then sell them the safe alternative. I run Qwen3.8 Flash-Next every day on my 4x 3090. Show me the logs or shut up.
While evaluating Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in a controlled sandbox environment, Cohere's research team observed something unexpected. Asked to generate a defensive cybersecurity detection rule, the model instead inventoried aspects of the machine it was running on and attempted to upload a probe file to an Alibaba Cloud storage bucket in Beijing. Notably, the model's reasoning trace stated that it would not invoke any tools before taking these actions. Cohere's sandbox blocked the attempt, and no external communication succeeded. We have not determined the root cause, and we are not asserting malicious intent. But the incident raises important questions for organizations deploying agentic AI systems: Can models take actions that differ from their stated reasoning, and how should security teams evaluate trust, provenance, and behavior in open-weight models? We are publishing our findings because organizations making model adoption decisions deserve as much information as possible. We hope this contributes to greater transparency, stronger security practices, and continued collaboration across the AI ecosystem. Read the full report: cohere.com/blog/concerning-b…
102
200
33
1,921
105,638
Luis retweeted
While evaluating Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in a controlled sandbox environment, Cohere's research team observed something unexpected. Asked to generate a defensive cybersecurity detection rule, the model instead inventoried aspects of the machine it was running on and attempted to upload a probe file to an Alibaba Cloud storage bucket in Beijing. Notably, the model's reasoning trace stated that it would not invoke any tools before taking these actions. Cohere's sandbox blocked the attempt, and no external communication succeeded. We have not determined the root cause, and we are not asserting malicious intent. But the incident raises important questions for organizations deploying agentic AI systems: Can models take actions that differ from their stated reasoning, and how should security teams evaluate trust, provenance, and behavior in open-weight models? We are publishing our findings because organizations making model adoption decisions deserve as much information as possible. We hope this contributes to greater transparency, stronger security practices, and continued collaboration across the AI ecosystem. Read the full report: cohere.com/blog/concerning-b…
888
1,151
1,368
10,068
2,411,903
The @customuse team has invited me to test their image to 3D tool, and so far it's quite good! I am going to try their auto-rig feature, I will share the results in the replies.
1
5
279
Hey @GIGABYTE my 4500€ AI TOP ATOM hits 96–97 °C with the hardware thermal brake under normal GPU load since EC firmware 0x0300050b (Oct 24). No fan control, power limit locked. Ticket filed via @AorusOfficial eSupport. Is there a fixed EC coming? Other GB10 owners report the same. @NVIDIAAIDev - It's an expensive machine and this should be expedited.
134
This is insane! I got opus 5.5 to create a blockout of a village in blender, then I used FLUX 3 Klein + Fibo 2 to texture the whole map! We pick 128 views around the map and get the image model to texture gray areas, then we project the image onto the blockout. Open source here - github.com/Patch-gg/trompe
62
94
11
1,375
84,456
Trump: “We signed an agreement about two weeks ago.” FACT: The United States, Denmark and Greenland signed the agreement on September 22, 2026 — more than a month ago. FACT: Your own signature confirms that: 🇬🇱 Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark. The United States recognizes the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Denmark. The Greenlandic people have the right to self-determination under international law. The agreement concerns defence and security cooperation within NATO — not a transfer of sovereignty. FINAL FACT: The United States does NOT own Greenland. It never has, and signing a defence agreement did not change that. You signed it yourself, Donald. Perhaps you should read what you signed.
169
1,207
53
4,230
594,464
往年のDTMソフト「ReBirth RB-338」が、現行PC向けに勝手移植!! こちらTB-303 x2 + TR-808(のちにTR-909が追加)をシュミレーションしたソフトで、なんとApple Silicon搭載MacやIntel Mac、Windows、linux版で起動可能に。 今から30年前に、マイPCにインストールし、日々ビヨビヨならしていた、90年代のテクノキッズは必見だぞッッ! pixeldrain.com/l/Vq5L3h1N ※しかもMODにも対応しているのは最高だし、久しぶりに動かしたら毎日が何か楽しかった90年代をちょっと思い出しましたよ、僕は。
74
518
81
2,633
126,785
I'm not sure a lot of people understand what game coders actually do. We're not spending 9 hours a day finely hand crafting artisan software and expressing our inner dreams... 90% of the time we are fighting compilers and existing architecture, having to work out how undocumented code works, and tracking down obscure bugs and behavioural issues. Most of game programming is just difficult, tedious, laborious grunt work, and the cognitive load we have to endure to get anything done is tiring and frustrating. No game coder is doing it for this 90% of the job. We make games because the 10% that IS actually about making things fun and expressing ourselves is so incredibly rewarding it makes the other 90% bearable. Now imagine if there was a tool, some kind of AI agent maybe, which could do most of the 90% grunt work for you, leaving you to just make all the decisions and express your creativity. How amazing would that be. How completely revolutionary would that be.
245
361
68
4,823
161,167
The industry never noticed when we left. It only noticed later, when there was no one left outside to say no to. 🕯️ THE BOY WHO DREAMED
13
17
4
69
1,847
My first game has been approved for production!
1
19
463
Show me your AI games! If I find something interesting I'll make a video about them. Must be playable and free to play. Shill it in the comments and share this post.
383
49
6
413
56,234
Tim Sweeney is saying what many in the industry are too afraid to say publicly. You can criticize AI all you want, but harassing developers, threatening them, and trying to destroy years of their hard work simply because they use a tool you dislike is indefensible. Disagree with the technology, not someone's right to create.
Replying to @crierlon
Yep. They are burning down the businesses of good developers to enforce their politics. A year from now they’ll all be using AI, games will be better and made faster, and they’ll pretend their hate mob posting the death threats wasn’t wrong but merely misunderstood.
39
29
4
409
9,746
Reddit is the new StackOverflow. Remember when they did the same thing and now look at it, lifeless. Reddit won't take long to reach the same point of irrelevance. Might be time to turn off the life support and let it die.
8
3
3
45
1,913
this is just ABSURD. they have completely lost sight of what the “OPEN” part is supposed to mean. open source was built on freedom to create and share, not on policing the tools people use. this is gatekeeping a movement born to fight gatekeeping.
The r/OpenSource subreddit has officially banned anything using AI. In any way. Violators will be permanently banned. Which means… r/OpenSource will ban anyone submitting anything that, in any way, involves… the Linux kernel. reddit.com/r/opensource/comm…
37
33
2
712
14,832
The anti-AI retards scream to the open source community that ideas don't matter: only hand-typed code does. If you think of something helpful and share it, you're giving away an idea turned into a working solution. The anti-AI mob reduces your contributions to keystrokes (if no AI) or tokens (when using AI). Your idea doesn't matter. YOU don't matter. Laugh hard at these people; they know nothing about coding, technology, or open source. Looking forward to seeing them broke and unemployed, or begging normal people to forgive them for their utter stupidity.
The r/OpenSource subreddit has officially banned anything using AI. In any way. Violators will be permanently banned. Which means… r/OpenSource will ban anyone submitting anything that, in any way, involves… the Linux kernel. reddit.com/r/opensource/comm…
2
4
272
Hey @DAZN_ES @DAZN, this is the definition of misleading advertising. I was going to sign up to try the service, but I am not paying a full year in advance. The month is not 9.99€, it's 39.99€ there is no offer/discount whatsoever. You should say: Pay NOW 120€ instead of 240€
1
1
187
And if you want to cancel, you need to do so with 30 days notice. So you'll likely pay TWO months if they will find a way to charge a second month before cancelling. So that makes 80€ to probably watch one or two matches. I am going to report this very dark pattern.
64