olezigaba

Here's a litmus test for your degree of interpersonal savvy. When you heard about Jensen Huang cheating on his wife, did you think: 1. Gosh, I guess people are outraged now that this has come to light, and I completely understand if no one trusts him now and he has to step down. 2. Hmmm, why is this coming to light right now? Did someone know about it already? Was that someone waiting to release this information? Is there an agenda here?

Nothing that is happening in DC will make any sense unless you first absorb one critical fact. Both political parties have been replaced. There are no Republicans. There are no Democrats. The stationary exists, but the political unity does not. They are pseudoparties. There are not two political parties in America, there are three. They are Nationalist Party, the Globalist Party, and the OogaBooga Party. Nationalists are heritage Americans who want to restore American values, principles and greatness to America by running America as if it were just like every other country on the map.... a blood and soil nation belonging to and representing a people. Example Nationalist politicians would be Pat Buchanan, Barry Goldwater, and Ross Perot. Examples Nationalist X accounts would be @AuronMacintyre, @romanhelmetguy, and myself. Globalists are a loose coalition of those who will stop at nothing to loot the system and enjoy the managed decline for as long as possible. Their plans focus on keeping the cost of labor down and the price of land up by moving industries and people freely across national borders as needed. Example Globalist politicians would be Joe Biden, Bill Clinton, and Ronald Reagan. Example Globalist X accounts would @JoelWBerry, @benshapiro, and @ConceptualJames. OogaBoogas are a collection of tribals wearing suits whose primary goals are self-enrichment, loyalty to their third world tribe of origin, and shared resentment of Western Civilization. They are also supported by dysfunctional bioleninists. Example OogaBooga politicians would be Zohran Mamdani, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Barrack Obama. OogaBoogas don't really have the wit for prominence on X, but they have eleventy-billion small accounts. Right now, the "democrats" are about to begin a power struggle between Globalists and OogaBooga, which OogaBooga will win, because all the things that make them win are unavoidable consequences of Globalists' cheap labor plan. The OogaBoogas are the golem that the Globalists have set loose to rampage in the streets, and they cannot fight it without abandoning their whole agenda. Also right now, the "republicans" are in the early stages of a power struggle between the Globalists and the Nationalists. This is why "republicans" appear to act like they don't want to win. Because the struggle is not between republicans and democrats. It is between Globalists and Nationalists. The need to defeat "democrat" candidates so as to retain elected office is always balanced by the need to weaponize those same "democrats" against others in the "republican" party, and so to prevent Nationalists from having federal representation. The fight for America's future is not between republicans and democrats for control of DC. It is between Nationalists and Globalists for control of the Republican Party. This is why the "republicans" did nothing with a supermajority for 2 years. There was no supermajority. Because there are no republicans. Only Nationalists, Globalists, and OogaBooga. It is meaningless for "republicans" to win elections now. Because there are no republicans. There are Globalists. And there are Nationalists. The Nationalists must win. And the timeframe for the Nationalists to do this is determined by the other civil war... the struggle for control of the Democratic Party. The Globalists in the DNC will eventually lose to the OogaBooga that they brought in to line their pockets. They have no effective defense against OogaBooga because they have been preaching open borders, decolonization, and anti-racism forever. They are analogous to the Jews of Prague in the old story, about to be murdered by their own Golem. The Nationalists must win control of the Republican Party before the Globalists lose control of the Democratic Party. Because Nationalists can beat OogaBooga, and Globalists can't. If the Nationalists win in time, they can curbstomp OogaBooga, Bukele style, and we can have a proper country again. If they don't, the United States will become a third world country, and we'll have to take a couple hundred thousand rednecks and conquer New Zealand or something to create a metaphorical seed bank for Western Civilization. The first step in winning is to understand who the enemy is. Bukele showed us that the power of a unified state, supported by its people, can always clean out domestic enemies with swift and ruthless action. The reason we haven't done that is that we have no unified state. Because of the true enemy. The enemy is Globalists, not OogaBoogas. We must understand that Globalist "republicans" are not fellow conservatives who are mistaken about something. They not conservatives. They conserve nothing. They are the enemy. We must purge ourselves of the enemy within. Then, and only then, can we defeat the enemy without.

I'm a storyteller. I will tell you a story. Not a thinly veiled allegory or analogy. Not a fable. Not a parody or a satire, or some smug little parable featuring characters "Ronald Grump" and "Alan Tusk". No, this is a true story, and it means what it means, with no hidden symbolism whatsoever. It contains only facts, and general principles to derive from them. It is a story about Rome. We all know what Rome was. It was a republic, then an Empire, then nothing. But every time we ask why, historians wish to tell us it is complicated, and that we desperately need historians, such as themselves, to sort it all out. The decline and fall of the Roman Empire was not complicated. The decline and fall of the Roman Empire can be explained in two words. Cheap labor. The Romans, as you know, had two classes, the patricians and the plebeians. The patricians ruled Rome. But the plebeians were Rome. And the patricians forgot this. Around this point in the story, you may be thinking you understand me already. You may think you have anticipated where I am going with this. You may think that this is going to be some general polemic about the importance of remembering the little people. It is not. I have a very specific meaning, and I always choose my words very, very carefully. Two words. Cheap. Labor. The Romans patricians, like the old and the rich of any society, owned land, and sold goods. To do this, they bought labor. The Roman plebeians, most especially the young, sold labor. So that they could buy goods and land. So, it should go without saying, but often doesn't, that it was in the interest of plebeians that goods and land be cheap, and labor be expensive, and in the interest of patricians that land and goods should be expensive, and labor should be cheap. Now, markets have natural cycles. The price of every thing fluctuates up and down, looking for an equilibrium which is only ever temporary. Sometimes goods and land are cheap, and labor is expensive. Then the plebeians become fat and prosperous, and they marry pretty girls and have lots of healthy children. Sometimes goods and land are expensive, and labor is cheap, and patricians amass vast fortunes and build fine estates and eat honeyed dormice. To every thing, there is a season. But the patricians controlled Rome. Not fully or directly, not in theory, but they had money. And money buys power. Just as power buys money. And the temptation, in the long run, became irresistible. To buy political power, and put the finger of that political power on the scales of the market. To make sure the cheap labor stays cheap forever. In Rome, cheap labor meant slaves. Elsewhere, it has meant other things. In Rome, slaves kept labor cheap not only because slaves don't get paid, and can't quit, but also because every plebeian who sells labor must compete with the slave on price. Little by little, this took away from the plebeians, not only because real wages were depressed, but more importantly because there were no seasons of labor scarcity. No cycles in the market where wages went high. No fat seasons for the plebes, just an ever-increasing drought. And, while the patricians controlled Rome, the plebeians were Rome. It was their blood, shed in the legions, that conquered the world. Their sweat that built the shining city of seven hills. And their patriotism that defined what Rome was. The patricians ruled Rome. But the plebeians were Rome, and when they ceased to bear allegiance to Rome, Rome ceased to exist, because the only thing that Rome ever was, the only thing that any city or nation ever is, is its people. A man who has no work, a man who must compete with slaves, a man who is beaten down to want the hungriest beggar will take, is a man who cannot have a home and a family. Not only because he cannot afford such things. But because no woman will have him. No woman will bear his children. The ultimate expression, after all, of female lust and admiration, is "I want to have his babies". Fewer people seem to realize that the reverse is true. I was told once, by a man who should have known better, that Rome fell because the Romans forgot what it meant to be Roman. Nonsense. Rome fell because Romans knew exactly what it meant to be Roman. Which meant they knew that to be Roman meant to be replaced by slaves. The patricians bore no allegiance to Rome, because it was cheaper to replace the Roman workers with slaves, and the Roman legions with mercenaries. The plebeians bore no allegiance to Rome, because Rome bore no allegiance to them. And so Rome simply ceased to be. The outward forms hung around awhile, until the mercenaries, bearing no true allegiance to Rome, realized they didn't have to wait to be paid. They could just... take. The patricians destroyed Rome because they thought like politicians instead of kings. A politician buys a crown by offering the most to those whose support is most in doubt. A king knows that crowns and thrones are only symbols, and power comes from armies of loyal men, whose loyalty must be bought with loyalty in turn. Not table scraps. The Roman plebeians didn't want, and couldn't survive on, free bread and circuses. They needed work and land and incomes to have families and happy lives. But no Caesar emerged in time. Tick tock, Mr. Vance. Tick tock.