Proud Indian, Bipartisan, Objective, Stands for Principles Not persons, Institutions Not Individuals, Believes in Perspective as much as Perception.
Joined June 2020
- Tweets257
- Following9
- Followers2
- Likes13
Pinned Tweet
The stupid American ignoramuses deserve this election verdict. They dined with Pakis in White House, danced with Ukraine, destroying Russia, demeaned India now bedding with snakes in grass.
Fools don’t have an idea what’s coming despite seeing Europe burning. USA today is Emotionally distraught Sick society run by brokers masquerading as consultants on Capitol Hill with collapsed institutions of Family values that made America great.
Morons can’t visualise real threat. Let them face it, Great going , let them suffer as Beyond money, materialism current Americans can’t understand the vision, values of their forefathers. Now most law makers have only permanent interests not values screwing up average good Americans.
We Indians know what these ‘peaceful vermin’ did for centuries; how much America harassed India by petting, grooming funding these snakes in the wars with Pakistan; we know how much blood innocent Indians spilled because of wicked scheming by brainless Senators, Congressmen who sold out to Lobbying firms and enacted self destructing policies letting loose these ‘peaceful snakes’ in the name of deep state statecraft.
Good going! now the assholes will know what is meant by keeping a snake as pet in your backyard and expecting it not to bite.
Karma is revisiting America in the form of these ‘most peaceful cavemen’ called Omars, Abdullahs, Hussains, Mohammeds.
Never it was so good for a civilisational values ridden country like India whom America lectured and sermonised!! Because It’s no more ‘seeing is believing’ now it is ‘experiencing is believing’ for America about harmless Indians vis a vis ‘most peaceful people’.
Now India baiters hecklers @bofrench @LauraLoomer @J_Fischbach @jamiesongreer @SecScottBessent
@RealPNavarro @SenBlumenthal who called India as “HellHole”, “Failed State” “Maharaja of Tariffs”, “Laundromat for Russian Oil” realise what’s in the offing.
Hope India friends @michaelgawaItz_ @RepAndyBarr @RepBera @TulsiGabbard @marcorubio @RepRoKhanna @SuhasforVA @JohnCornyn @PiaforCongress @RepMcCormick see how a strong stable peaceful India is America’s best friend than a #BeggarState
Wish saner wise counsels like @JeffSachsCenter @MiltonFriedmanW @MearsheimerJ guide the destiny
@Heritage @Conservatives @MAGAVoice @TulsiGabbard @VivekGRamaswamy @USAmbIndia @harshvshringla @DrSJaishankar @ShashiTharoor @seanhannity @IngrahamAngle @AnneColter @realDonaldTrump @GeorgiaMeloni
Look at these ‘peaceful followers of ‘peaceful religion’ ‼️😂
Look at them. This is from #Michigan
They look like Ghosts👻 and Evils👿 straight from The Exorcists, The Evil Dead.
Americans paying for their
🤔ignorance about barbaric cultures
🤔Ignorance about good and bad civilisational values
🤔Ignorance about Crusades
🤔Ignorance about history
🤔Importing Chaff & Grain
🤔Equating harmless Hindus with Barbarians
🌹Ignorant how Indian civilisation is thousands of years old, we reached pinnacle when Abrahamic religions are primitive and medieval
Poor Americans 😂‼️
India withstood invasions much more barbaric than what USA witnessing through Abdullahs, Omar’s, Syeds, Mohammeds,
When you are ignorant, you pay for it because
IGNORANCE CAN’T BE BLISS
The stupid American ignoramuses deserve this election verdict. They dined with Pakis in White House, danced with Ukraine, destroying Russia, demeaned India now bedding with snakes in grass.
Fools don’t have an idea what’s coming despite seeing Europe burning. USA today is Emotionally distraught Sick society run by brokers masquerading as consultants on Capitol Hill with collapsed institutions of Family values that made America great.
Morons can’t visualise real threat. Let them face it, Great going , let them suffer as Beyond money, materialism current Americans can’t understand the vision, values of their forefathers. Now most law makers have only permanent interests not values screwing up average good Americans.
We Indians know what these ‘peaceful vermin’ did for centuries; how much America harassed India by petting, grooming funding these snakes in the wars with Pakistan; we know how much blood innocent Indians spilled because of wicked scheming by brainless Senators, Congressmen who sold out to Lobbying firms and enacted self destructing policies letting loose these ‘peaceful snakes’ in the name of deep state statecraft.
Good going! now the assholes will know what is meant by keeping a snake as pet in your backyard and expecting it not to bite.
Karma is revisiting America in the form of these ‘most peaceful cavemen’ called Omars, Abdullahs, Hussains, Mohammeds.
Never it was so good for a civilisational values ridden country like India whom America lectured and sermonised!! Because It’s no more ‘seeing is believing’ now it is ‘experiencing is believing’ for America about harmless Indians vis a vis ‘most peaceful people’.
Now India baiters hecklers @bofrench @LauraLoomer @J_Fischbach @jamiesongreer @SecScottBessent
@RealPNavarro @SenBlumenthal who called India as “HellHole”, “Failed State” “Maharaja of Tariffs”, “Laundromat for Russian Oil” realise what’s in the offing.
Hope India friends @michaelgawaItz_ @RepAndyBarr @RepBera @TulsiGabbard @marcorubio @RepRoKhanna @SuhasforVA @JohnCornyn @PiaforCongress @RepMcCormick see how a strong stable peaceful India is America’s best friend than a #BeggarState
Wish saner wise counsels like @JeffSachsCenter @MiltonFriedmanW @MearsheimerJ guide the destiny
@Heritage @Conservatives @MAGAVoice @TulsiGabbard @VivekGRamaswamy @USAmbIndia @harshvshringla @DrSJaishankar @ShashiTharoor @seanhannity @IngrahamAngle @AnneColter @realDonaldTrump @GeorgiaMeloni
Without Malice retweeted
#news A prominent Democrat has come out saying allegations that Ilhan Omar married her brother are "almost certainly true" and that Democrats need to stop writing it off as a right-wing, Islamophobic, or racist conspiracy.
He also warned his colleagues about how they defend her against financial allegations,
"You should be very, very careful"
Joe Radinovich, represented House District 10B in Minnesota from 2013 to 2015 as a member of the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party.
He also served as Chief of Staff for Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey.
Radinovich said that Omar hasn't been asked any meaningful questions, and that an objective look at the evidence does not look great for Omar.
When criticized by his fellow democrats, Radinovich took shots at President Trump, but noted that a D.C. judge signed off on the warrant and that he is pretty confident this specific allegation is true.
He said it's hard to believe her denials at this point because of the:
🔵Marriage timelines,
🔵Tax filings,
🔵Deleted social media posts,
🔵Withdrawn paperwork,
🔵A default divorce, and
🔵Sourcing from Obama-era prosecutors.
Republicans have pointed out the overlapping timelines for years:
Omar’s faith-based relationship with Hirsi, the M*slim marriage to Elmi (alleged brother) while she continued to have children with Hirsi, the joint tax filings during the legal marriage to Elmi, and Elmi’s withdrawal of his green-card petition when officials asked for more proof.
Some have also pointed to a private DNA analysis of discarded items that reportedly showed a high-probability sibling match, though that testing has not been confirmed.
Critics say the Obama-era investigation and finding of evidence, makes the fraud claim credible rather than political.
What does it mean when Democrats start turning on people in their own party?
#christinaaguayonews
Nice analysis
🇺🇸 “THE PICASSO OF PETTINESS”: A BRITISH WRITER’S SCATHING VERDICT ON TRUMP
A blistering critique attributed to British writer Nate White has been circulating for years, offering an explanation as to why Donald Trump inspires such intense contempt among some British people.
White’s argument goes beyond Trump’s politics. He portrays a man who mistakes insults for humor, aggression for strength, and public humiliation for entertainment.
“He has turned mediocrity into an art form. He is the Picasso of pettiness, the Shakespeare of shit.”
One of the sharpest observations concerns how Trump treats others. White describes someone who delights in attacking those in weaker positions, yet becomes considerably more accommodating when facing powerful figures.
“He always punches down,” the writer asserts.
The critique reflects a distinctively British ideal of leadership: composure, self-deprecating humor, restraint, and the ability to exercise authority without constantly demanding admiration.
American author Stephen King has expressed similarly grave concerns regarding Trump’s politics, warning against authoritarianism and the willingness of Republican leaders to prioritize party loyalty over democratic institutions.
The two critiques approach Trump from different angles: one attacks his character and public behavior, while the other focuses on the political consequences of his leadership.
And White’s most memorable line remains hard to forget:
“His flaws are fractal: even his flaws have flaws.”
Without Malice retweeted
Opinion | Don't Bet On Trump's Mid-Term Humbling To Reset India-US Ties
Blinded by hubris, blinkered by a parochial worldview, buoyed by a toxic MAGA echo chamber, boosted by meretricious camp followers, Donald Trump didn’t see it coming. Not until the American people had to virtually hold the electoral looking glass up to Trump’s face so he could read their verdict. And it is a resounding rebuke.
But what does the result mean for India-US relations? Will a humbled Trump press the reset button as he loses political leverage in DC? Will he read the verdict as a rejection of his policies and rollback on trade-related tariff tyranny? Will he rethink his stand on immigration, H-1B visas, PERM? And, most importantly, will the result force Trump to dilute his transactional approach and invest in a more conventional approach to diplomacy with India?
Many commentators believe that the drubbing will force a recalibration. But that is not a guarantee. In fact, there’s a case to be made that Trump’s loss is not necessarily India’s gain.
AMERICA FIRST IS HERE TO STAY
Protectionism is now bipartisan. Trump isn't the only problem. America’s inward retreat, its lurch towards protectionism is bigger than Trump. Remember that some of the protectionist policies we’re seeing today precede Trump. Clinton, Obama, and Biden, all Democratic Presidents, also toyed with protecting strategic sectors and using tariffs to restore the balance of trade. Also, don’t forget that the vote against Team Trump that entered a costly, unwinnable war was because the Republicans were found guilty of not putting America first.
TRADE FRICTIONS WON'T VANISH
Tariffs, market access, and India's Russian oil purchases remain flashpoints. There will be more pressure to get Russia and Ukraine to sign, and there will be more pressure on countries who are seen as part of the problem. Democratic President Biden was the first one to have mooted energy sanctions against Russia to choke Putin’s war machine.
CHANGE ISN’T NECESSARILY BETTER
The Democratic party is today beating to a more left-liberal drum. It has long moved away from the Centre to the Left. Most Democrat lawmakers that wield influence over the Democratic party view the rise of Hindu nationalism with suspicion. They would much rather work with Opposition political actors in India than the NDA. When Modi visited America under Biden, more than one principal in the Democrat party stood on a soapbox to comment on what they called was the erosion of democratic values in India. The expressions used by the Democrat legislators weren’t well received by Delhi.
CHINA WILL DICTATE THE EQUATION:
With Trump losing political heft in Washington, it is Beijing that gets stronger. But even that won’t make the US reach out to India. Biden was famously soft on China. The Biden administration didn’t even carry forward the QUAD initiative that Trump had enthusiastically nurtured when he was first elected to power in 2016. Today, the QUAD, even under patron Trump, suffers neglect as DC warms up to China. Of course, the US is de-risking from China, and Washington wants India as a counterweight, but not necessarily as an independent geopolitical pole.
WEAKENED TRUMP STILL HAS EXECUTIVE POWER
Congress can constrain Trump, not automatically reverse his tariffs or foreign policy. In interviews after his party’s debacle, Trump has himself threatened to exercise his “veto” power to prevent, as he says, every “Left loony” policy that the Democrats hope to drive through Congress.
A CORNERED TRUMP COULD BE MORE TRANSACTIONAL:
Domestic political setbacks may make him tougher, more unpredictable. He will be under pressure to be tougher and less accommodating. After all, what's he got to lose? It’s not as if he is going to be paying a personal political price for his decision-making.
For all the reasons above, the Modi government would be well-advised against holding its breath.
Without Malice retweeted
The Republicans’ electoral defeat weakens Trump at home but leaves him considerable freedom of action in foreign policy. Towards the end of their second terms, American presidents have often focused on international affairs to demonstrate their ability to deliver results: Bill Clinton sought an Israeli–Palestinian peace agreement, Barack Obama concluded the nuclear deal with Iran and restored relations with Cuba, and George W. Bush increased the US military presence in Iraq after the Republicans’ defeat in the 2006 elections. Trump, too, may step up his foreign policy initiatives in pursuit of quick wins.
Trump has already created a degree of turbulence in US foreign policy. Let us hope it does not turn into a nosedive. His scope for quick diplomatic successes is limited: previous negotiations with Putin and Xi Jinping have produced no significant results, while new agreements would require time and mutual concessions. Decisions on limited military operations, however, can be taken much more quickly.
Iran remains an area where both a negotiated end to the war and renewed escalation are possible. The war and the resulting rise in prices were among the reasons for American voters’ discontent. Trump may try to end the conflict through an agreement, presenting it as the result of US military pressure. However, Tehran sees that he has been weakened politically and may be in no hurry to make concessions. In that case, the president may resort to further strikes in the hope of changing Iran’s position.
On Iran, Trump can count on support from some Democrats, though mainly for specific measures. Senator John Fetterman has consistently supported forceful military action, while Congressman Josh Gottheimer backed the initial strikes but argued for limiting the duration of the operation. Democrats may support sanctions, efforts to curb Iran’s nuclear programme or a diplomatic agreement, but they are unlikely to agree to another prolonged war. Congress will be able to tighten scrutiny of military spending, though its ability to block particular presidential decisions will remain limited.
On Russia, Trump may talk about negotiations, but the Kremlin remains unwilling to end the war. Trump may therefore try to secure a limited agreement, such as a ceasefire or a freeze in hostilities, that he can present as a diplomatic success. However, without reliable security guarantees, such a deal would leave Russia able to resume its aggression. Broader agreements with Putin and Xi Jinping, including on strategic stability, also remain difficult because of differences between the parties.
The new Congress will make it harder to implement agreements involving major concessions to Russia. Democrats Jeanne Shaheen, Chris Coons, Richard Blumenthal, Jacky Rosen and Chuck Schumer have previously supported peace initiatives while insisting on security guarantees for Ukraine, respect for its sovereignty and sanctions pressure on Moscow. They may support further sanctions or negotiations for a lasting peace, but they will oppose unilateral concessions to the Kremlin.
In relations with Europe, Trump has more scope for cooperation with Democrats, particularly on defence spending. Many Democrats, including Jeanne Shaheen, Chris Coons and Dick Durbin, agree that European countries need to contribute more to their own security. However, Trump also sees this as an opportunity to reduce US commitments, whereas most moderate Democrats support maintaining America’s leading role in NATO. At the same time, the view that Europe should take greater responsibility is gaining ground within the Democratic Party. Even a change of president in 2028 would therefore not guarantee a return to the previous model of transatlantic relations. Trump may also continue to use tariffs, threats to reduce the US military presence and other means of putting pressure on allies.
A separate risk is the possibility of a military operation against Cuba. The administration is already imposing severe economic restrictions, and regime change in Cuba remains one of Marco Rubio’s priorities. Trump may see Cuba as a place where he can quickly demonstrate results without complicated negotiations with major powers. However, regime change by force could trigger a humanitarian crisis, a new wave of refugees and growing discontent among Americans.
The electoral defeat is also accelerating the struggle over the future of the Republican Party after Trump. Republican politicians must weigh the fact that his support helps them win primaries, while close ties to an unpopular president can hurt them in general elections. Potential successors, including JD Vance, Marco Rubio and Ron DeSantis, represent different visions for the party’s future. Yet an open break with Trump remains risky because of his influence over Republican voters. The struggle for leadership is therefore likely to involve a gradual distancing from particular presidential decisions, especially on the economy, tariffs and Iran.
Following the elections, Trump is weaker at home, but his foreign policy decisions may become less predictable. In the near term, two developments will be worth watching: whether he tries to compensate for diplomatic difficulties through military escalation, and how quickly Republicans begin distancing themselves from his decisions as they prepare for the 2028 elections.
By preliminary election results, the Republicans are losing in both chambers of the US Congress. The Congress will have its first meeting with the newly elected members on January 3.
According to projections, the Democrats are also winning control of the Senate.
President Trump said that he is "absolutely willing" to accept the election results. This election could become a start for future transformations in the Republican Party.
Now, the world is watching whether the military operation in Iran will continue in the next few days.
Regarding Ukraine: it is unlikely that Putin is now ready for real negotiations. In the next months, Russia will continue escalating and increasing pressure on Ukraine. Since Europe is unlikely to remove sanctions on Russia any time soon, Putin will continue his terror in Ukraine and the hybrid war in Europe.
Without Malice retweeted
What the Muslim Brotherhood Plans for You if It Is Elected
—Mohamed Saad Khairalla
How did a group carrying an ideological project that extended beyond the boundaries of the nation manage to convince all these people that it was merely a natural partner in building a democratic state? How did the smiling face that it chose succeed in concealing the true nature of its political project?
Egypt’s military council did not seem unaware of the Brotherhood’s political vision. Rather, it appeared to see the group as an instrument that could be used to reproduce the very system that the Egyptian people had just brought to an end.
[T]he Muslim Brotherhood... regards loyalty to itself as the most important criterion and views the state as political spoils whose institutions must be brought under its control.
Before long... [t]he smiling face gradually disappeared, and the Brotherhood’s political objectives — which it had avoided mentioning — appeared everywhere. These included “Mastery of the World” and “The Caliphate State.” Signs on the walls of every public office stated, “Islam is the solution.” The question now was no longer whether the Brotherhood would govern the state but how far it would seek to reshape the state in its own image.
What we wanted was a state ruled neither by a military general “protecting the nation” nor by a Supreme Guide “protecting the religion.” We wanted a state in which sovereignty belonged to a constitution, power to the citizens, public positions to those with ability, and rights to everyone — without discrimination on the basis of religious belief or political allegiance.
At the time, however, we did not realize that overthrowing the Brotherhood’s government would pave the way for the restoration of the military regime against which we had originally revolted.
The Egyptian experience [during the 2011-2013 “Arab Spring”] revealed how a revolution against authoritarianism can become another form of authoritarianism and how an organization that raises the banner of democracy can embody the adversaries of democracy.
What happens to democracy when power is entrusted to an organization that does not place democratic values and principles above its ideological project?
The fall of the Ottoman Empire was part of the views at the time in which al-Banna’s project took shape. There was a desire to revive the Islamic nation and restore Islam to a central position in organizing society and the state. Consequently, treating the Brotherhood as an ordinary political party that differs from other parties only in its religion means overlooking the most important question: Is participation in elections the ultimate goal of the project, or is it one of the means that can be employed to achieve objectives that extend beyond the boundaries of the nation-state and liberal democracy?
The real question is not whether the Brotherhood accepts the ballot box as a means of reaching power, but whether it accepts the constraints imposed by the constitution, the peaceful transfer of power, judicial independence, freedom of religion and expression, and full equality in citizenship even when these principles conflict with its ideological convictions — or whether it seeks to set about changing them to promote its vision of how it believes the world ought to be.
The difference between rhetoric that reassures the public of moderation on one side, and an ideology that defines the organization’s ultimate objectives on the other, may not become clear until the demands of democratic governance come into conflict with the requirements of the ideological project.
The Muslim Brotherhood’s emblem features two crossed swords, a Qur’an, and the word “Wa-a’iddu” (“And prepare”), which refers to verse 60 of Surah Al-Anfal: “And prepare against them whatever you are able of power and of steeds of war by which you may terrify the enemy of Allah and your enemy and others besides them whom you do not know [but] whom Allah knows. And whatever you spend in the cause of Allah will be fully repaid to you, and you will not be wronged.” — (Quran, 8:60, Sahih International Translation)
They mean it.
What if the Muslim Brotherhood came to power in this country or that? What would happen to the state and its institutions, to society and its freedoms, and to the democracy that enabled the Brotherhood to reach power?
I lived through the experience — and paid a price. The journey began with the dream of establishing a democratic civil state in Egypt and ended in exile, after confronting two competing projects vying for power that shared a hostility toward the civil state: the project of religious rule and the project of military rule.
Continue Reading Article >>>
gatestoneinstitute.org/22959…
Honestly, I thought Bangladesh won't fail as country, because as a Nation it is founded on cultural rather than bigoted Islamic values. Sadly, the "peaceful followers" of "most peaceful religions" selfdestructing by being pawns of Pak-US-China, who derived vicarious pleasure in demeaning, belittling India who stood by Bangladeshis in their hour of crisis.
Feel sad !😢 its leaders @trahmanbnp @albd1971 @ABPartyBD @bdbnp78 are letting poor people
Now neither @IfficialDGISPR nor @Yunus_Centre will come to rescue. In these Xenophobic times each country is using other as disposable, that’s how Pakistan, USA, China using Bangladesh. Sadly it did not realise.
@ProthomAlo @dailystarnews @bdnews24com @TrendBangla
Without Malice retweeted
Good for you
teapaw.org/ImtiazMadmood/status/2…
Biased reporting on India while your back yard is fire 🔥 ❗️@ThaisEscufon @RadioGenoa @TRobinsonNewEra
Biased reporting on India while your back yard is fire 🔥 ❗️@ThaisEscufon @RadioGenoa @TRobinsonNewEra
Must watch. Vivek @Wadhwa on my show tonight on global toolkit narratives against India & the desperate hypocrisy of the West painting India as a dying democracy:
The shroud has come off !😂😂😂
🚨 INTERVIEWER: Your real name was Salim, but you changed it to Yogendra because children mocked you at school.
YOGENDRA: Salim was my birth name. I faced questions and mockery at school when I was just four years old.
INTERVIEWER 🔥 : Then why not change your name back to Salim?
YOGENDRA ⚡: Why should I? Why don't you change yours?
INTERVIEWER 🔥🔥 : Why should I change my name? It's my real name.
Without Malice retweeted
In 2002, an IIT Kanpur civil engineer working as an IES officer wrote to Prime Minister Vajpayee, exposing corruption in the $10 billion Golden Quadrilateral Corridor - India's biggest highway project.
Designed to construct 14,000 km of 4-lane expressways connecting Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, and Kolkata, it stands as the modern bedrock of Indian infrastructure.
He left his letter to the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) unsigned. Knowing the deadly stakes, Dubey attached his credentials on a separate sheet with an explicit instruction:
"Before moving the file, please remove the attachment containing my particulars to ensure secrecy."
But the PMO did not redact that information. It forwarded his complaint down the ministry chain with his identity attached. His name reached the very people he had exposed.
One year later, on his 31st birthday, Satyendra Dubey was shot dead outside Gaya railway station by the mafia.
They called it armed robbery. His family never believed it. The men who ran the murder racket were never touched, even after a CBI probe.
His death led to the Whistleblowers Protection Act in 2014. It was never brought into force, and it still doesn't protect a whistleblower's identity to this day.
His father, a poor sugar mill clerk with 7 kids, spent his entire life’s savings to raise an honest son who went to
@IITKanpur and then joined the IES to serve the nation.
On November 27, 2003, instead of celebrating Satyendra’s 31st birthday, that old man received his son’s bullet-riddled body in a wooden box, forced to weep over the casket of a hero he spent a lifetime raising for a country that wasn't brave enough to keep him alive.
Without Malice retweeted
Please take this warning to heart because every word is true. The written words of Satin are telling them how to do it in the Quran, and they believe every word of it.
Without Malice retweeted
💡MOSSADIL COMMENTARY:
EUROPE GOT IT BACKWARDS AND IT IS NOW BURNING
Europe thought it was helping people escape failed societies.
Instead, it allowed the ideologies and conflicts they were supposedly escaping to expand into Europe itself.
Now the Palestinian flag has become the rallying cry, not just against Israel, but for movements openly hostile to Western identity and civilization.
That’s the part Europe missed.
They thought they were offering an escape. NO! They were enabling an expansion.
Without Malice retweeted
Shoplifting in the UK is getting out of control. This footage was filmed inside a Sainsbury’s on Whitehorse Lane in London. A pregnant worker bravely confronted a shoplifter, but he just kept stuffing Pringles into his bag without stopping.
That woman needs to step away. Criminals who steal in broad daylight are unpredictable & they can lash out anytime. It ain't worth it confronting him, especially when you're pregnant.
As long as these crimes continue to go unpunished, people will continue to steal blatantly and not give a single atom's worth of a fuck.
Bullet proof safety glass,metal detectors in just about every store ,guards dressed like swat team members ready to tackle anyone .A guy looking at your receipt at walmart and locked makeup cabinets.
And price increase due to more money spent on all these things. And also treats every customer like a potential threat. Its hostile architecture.
I miss the old days when shoplifting is done by kids , they steal one pack of candy and they run, instead of grown man filling up a bag.