Exposing Chainlink Labs and their utterly insidious (paid) shills. Whistleblowers: exposingchainlink (at) proton (dot) me
Nail Salon in San Francisco
Joined May 2024
- Tweets2.7K
- Following152
- Followers1.2K
- Likes1.9K
Chainlink Is A Scam retweeted
"Token needed!"
For what?
"To go to $link's Lab's reserve!"
Watching Sergey continuously shit in his holders mouths and watching them continuously call it delicious will never not be funny to me.
What happens to $LINK if the Democrats take the House and subpoena @worldlibertyfi?
Imagine the findings on the @chainlinklabs deals with @SergeyNazarov & @ChrisBarrett just to buy Trump access and dump tokens on retail.
Here is @SergeyNazarov with @WatcherChase & @zakfolkman of @worldlibertyfi, running a money laundering scheme/crypto scam for Trump & Witkoff.
This is how @chainlink got WH access for their failed Clarity lobbying campaign. @ChrisBarrett, who ran it, should be immediately fired.
"One day they are going to activate the token and make it fundamental to every product" is also speculation and not evidence. The only difference is that them abandoning the token is more plausible as it hasn't been given any utility in almost a decade.
Chainlink Is A Scam retweeted
You are so full of shit, respectfully. The token is WORTHLESS. It’s $11 after being in business a decade. They walked back every promise to stakers, they never paid GMX fees, they never added price feeds or additional services to their staking mechanism. The token just keeps getting dumped quarterly for Sergey’s fat pockets. This has been going on for a decade. You have no idea what you’re talking about.
Institutions have said out loud they prefer fiat payments. Nothing gets sent to token holders. CCIP has been live for years and the fees keep getting smaller and smaller. The token is down 80% from all-time high, while the rest of crypto exploded. All these integrations have added zero to the token’s value.
Stop lying. The truth is “onchain”, so you’re not fooling anyone carrying water for these demons
Vibe researching certainly would make my job easier, yet I still do it the old fashioned way. I’ve been covering crypto professionally since 2020. I have a fundamental framework I use to value cryptocurrencies, which was applied here. It centers on the competitive angles, risks, and tokenomics. Had calls with the team at Chainlink to address areas where i found gaps in process.
I also think we fairly addressed the issue you bring up:
LINK holders do not receive direct cash flows, so revenue growth may not translate directly into LINK appreciation.
This is a common risk of many cryptocurrencies.
Our base case was demand for chainlink grows in-line with the broader crypto market. 2020/2021 will always be an overhang in the short term for many cryptocurrencies because the price rises were based on no fundamentals whatsoever. With institutions starting to use blockchains, fundamentals matter more going forward.
The only way $LINK accrues value is if @chainlinklabs increases the reserve buyback. Problem: no one knows where that reserve's revenue comes from or whether it's even real.
Meanwhile, the $LINK token plays no role in their products.
My bet: Chainlink will abandon their token.
🚨HUGE DAY LOOK AT ME! I AM @RealAllinCrypto TRYING TO BE CRYPTO INFLUENCER PEDDLING LIES AND INFLATING NOTHINGBURGERS TO MY DOUBLE DIGIT IQ FOLLOWERS 🚨