A Scottish Atheist 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

Before mathematics tells us the truth below, yes #GazaStarving for real journalists and human rights organizations, not for Hamas or Muslim Brotherhood propaganda that trends only when their negotiations fail. And yes #GazaGenocide we have all seen it daily as Hamas executes people simply for accepting humanitarian aid from groups like @GHFUpdates. So let’s agree you didn’t post about famine in Sudan, Somalia, or starvation in Niger because you don’t actually care about humanity. You’re either antisemitic, a hostage of Hamas propaganda, or just plain ignorant. But let’s take you through this journey: Since October 7, 2023, Gaza has received over 1.8 million metric tonnes of humanitarian aid, delivered through more than 22,000 trucks, for a population of just 2.1 million. That equals roughly 857 kilograms of aid per person since the war began. Assuming an average of 3,500 calories per kilogram, this food aid provides over 6.3 trillion calories in total. With Gaza's population needing 4.2 billion calories per day (based on a 2,000-calorie diet), this stockpile alone could feed every person in Gaza for more than 1,500 days with three full meals a day. Even if the daily intake jumped to four full meals a day, Gaza would still be covered for over 1,125 days. Let’s compare this to Europe. The entire city of Paris could eat for over four years on this volume of food. Berlin, with 3.6 million people, would be covered for nearly three years. Rome, population 2.8 million, could be fed for almost three and a half years. Meanwhile, countries with real famine are lucky to receive scraps. In South Sudan, over 6.3 million people face critical food insecurity, yet they receive less than a quarter of Gaza’s per capita aid. Somalia, where over 7 million are in dire need, sees aid valued at less than 30 dollars per person, compared to Gaza’s estimated 133 dollars. In Chad, Niger, Burkina Faso, and Tigray, the numbers are so low they don’t even meet the minimum international food thresholds. If Gaza were a restaurant, it would be one receiving 400 supply trucks per day, with gourmet-level logistics on every street corner. Meanwhile, Africa is starving, with children drinking from disease-infested puddles and mothers boiling tree bark. But the world’s cameras and hashtags remain obsessively zoomed in on Gaza. This is no longer about hunger. It is about overfeeding a narrative. Humanitarian aid must be about need, not politics. Yet resources are being funneled into a terrorist-run enclave with food stocks exceeding nearly every other crisis zone on Earth. Groups like Islamic Relief, headquartered in Birmingham, UK, claim neutrality, yet their shipments conveniently disappear into Hamas tunnels. Meanwhile, real starvation in Tigray, Niger, and Sudan is met with silence. No spotlight. No outrage. Just quiet death while France, the UK, and others pour fuel and food into a conflict they publicly claim to want solved.