I write as a student of history. History will be brutally cruel to Hon'ble CJI Ranjan Gogoi, D.Y. Chandrachud, and Surya Kant et al. Like judges under Hitler who swore personal loyalty to the Führer and turned courts into regime weapons, these men presided over the slow death of judicial independence in India Ranjan Gogoi: Fast-tracked Ayodhya to favour the regime. Sealed covers in Rafale. Ignored Kashmir habeas corpus while prioritising a "land dispute." Sexual harassment allegations handled in a kangaroo court he himself led. Reward? Rajya Sabha seat. Classic post-retirement payoff. D.Y. Chandrachud: Master of the roster who delayed critical cases against power — electoral bonds struck down too late, bail pleas of dissenters buried. Ayodhya bench justified majoritarianism. Prayers before verdicts and public Ganesh Puja with the PM? Optics of captured judiciary. Surya Kant: Part of benches delivering selective justice. Controversial remarks and decisions that echo executive comfort over constitutional duty. When judges start sounding like regime defenders, the institution is in ICU. Under them, Supreme Court became an "Executive Court" — dual system where ordinary cases limp along, but politically sensitive ones deliver predictable outcomes. History judged Nazi-era judges harshly for enabling persecution under the colour of law. Yours won't be kinder. The records are unforgiving.

Reposting !